Morgan Mouchka

@morgan-mouchka.bsky.social

PhD scientist, educator, mom, and ocean enthusiast. 🌊 Passionate about training the next generation of scientists. 🧬 Education Coordinator for SD IRACDA at UC San Diego. 🔱 Tap dancer and lifter of medium weights. 💪🏼

Last year I looked at NIH grants for which the the titles had changed in the course of administrative renewal. These title changes were part of the negotiations required between program officers and applicants (a process referred to as "remediation" by Deputy Director Jon Lorsch). 1/5

HHS just published an update to its Scientific Integrity Policy. Notably, it has removed the concept of political interference, and no longer calls it out as something specifically to be prevented. www.hhs.gov/sites/defaul... (deletions in red, insertions in green)

Highlighted in red: "Political interference is inappropriately shaping or interfering in the conduct, management, communication, or use of science for political advantage or such that it undermines impartiality, nonpartisanship, or professional judgement""HHS works to promote a culture of scientific integrity by creating an empowering environment for innovation and protecting scientists and the process of science from inappropriate interference. Scientific findings and products must not be suppressed, delayed, or altered for political purposes and must not be subjected to political interference or inappropriate influence. The responsible and ethical conduct of research and other scientific activities requires an environment that is safe and free from harassment and discrimination" Highlighted in red are "suppressed, delayed, or altered for political purposes", "subjected to political interference", and "inappropriate influence.""HHS works to promote a culture of scientific integrity by creating an empowering environment for innovation and protecting scientists and the process of science from inappropriate interference. Scientific findings and products must not be subjected to interference or inappropriate influence and must not be inappropriately suppressed, delayed, or altered. The responsible and ethical conduct of research and other scientific activities requires an environment that is safe and free from harassment and discrimination." Highlighted in green are "subjected to interference or inappropriate influence" and "inappropriately suppressed, delayed, or altered."Text, with "political" highlighted in red to indicate removal:

I. Protecting Scientific Processes
Scientific integrity fosters "honest scientific investigation, open discussion, refined understanding, and a firm commitment to evidence" (OSTP 2010). It also enables consideration and documentation of differing scientific opinions. Practices that support scientific integrity may include peer review and open science.
Science, and public trust in science, thrives in an environment that prevents political interference and inappropriate influence from impacting scientific data and analyses and their use in decision making.
It is the policy of HHS to:
1. Prohibit political interference or other inappropriate influence in the design, proposal, conduct, review, management, evaluation, communication about, and use of scientific activities and scientific information.
Prohibit inappropriate restrictions on resources and capacity that limit and reduce the availability of science and scientific products (e.g., manuscripts for scientific journals, presentations for workshops, conferences, and symposia) outside of normal budgetary or priority-setting processes or without scientific, legal, or security justification.
3. Require that leadership and management ensure that covered individuals engaged in scientific activities can conduct their work objectively, free from political interference or other inappropriate influence, and free from retaliation.

Looking for a way to celebrate Earth Day while fighting for our planet? Join us on Wednesday, April 22 at 8 PM ET for the Virtual & Accessible Earth Day 2026 Rally hosted by Stand Up for Science. (ASL interpretation, live captioning, and Spanish audio translation) Visit zurl.co/6za7Z to register!

The graphic contains an image of the Earth and a laptop. The graphic reads: "Virtual & Accessible Earth Day 2026 Rally, Organized By Stand Up For Science, Wednesday, April 22, 2026 - 8PM ET. Defend Our Planet, Save Our Science. LINK IN BIO." The graphic also contains the Stand Up for Science and EARTHDAY.ORG logo.

I would greatly appreciate anyone amplifying this or contributing. The Alex Pretti nursing scholarship is being created. An endowed scholarship awarded to a student with financial need. Preference will be given to students with an interest in supporting America's veterans. Link below. Thank you.

I'm supporting the University of Minnesota Foundation!

Help support academics and scholarships at the University of Minnesota.

crowdfund.umn.edu

If you're headed to the San Diego Festival of Science & Engineering tomorrow, stop by our #StandUpForScience booth! We'll be making string out of algae polymers & encouraging folks to support SB 895. On this national day of action, we're sharing our love for science & the urgent need to defend it!

Bild
Stand Up for Science!@standupforscience.net · 7mo ago

It's up to us to save science, protect health and defend this democracy! Stand up! Speak out! Hit the streets on March 7th! Join us on the streets at rallies nationwide on March 7th.zurl.co/Rcwcl #ItsUpToUs #standupforscience #rally #March7

NO ONE IS COMING TO SAVE US

Other are bringing this up but we always have to ask: WHO are we talking about when we say “Science is doing okay?” Science is NOT just about how much funding gets allocate, it is about WHO is getting funded. The staffing issues and changing policies are STILL affecting THOSE decisions

Colette Delawalla, PhD@cdelawalla.bsky.social · 8mo ago

This is a HUGE win…and one that happened because we ~collectively~ said “NO!” But AAAS coming in and saying on record to the NYT “Science is doing ok. Things are not bad at all…” is baffling. If things are hard for you as a scientist, please share in the comments. www.nytimes.com/2026/01/10/s...

If you are submitting an NIH grant in February, you will be required to use SciENcv to prepare you biosketch. IT IS MUCH WORSE THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE. Set aside *at least* 4 hours just to transfer an existing an biosketch into SciENcv.

"If scientific research, especially biomedical research, is meant to serve everyone, then it requires that everyone has an opportunity to participate." 🧪 Powerful commentary that outlines the history of broadening participation in US science & what we stand to lose as these efforts are rolled back.

Scaling back DEI programmes and the loss of scientific talent - Nature Cell Biology

Programmes that support diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in science are under attack in the USA. Data indicate that diversity in the scientific workforce increases creativity and success in tackl...

nature.com