Nigel Herbig

@nigelherbig.bsky.social

Dad, husband, political dork. Mayor of Kenmore, WA Disc golfer, #TBTL Ten, #Seahawks fan. Passionate about transit, housing, and climate (they're all inextricably connected, folks!)

When I was in grad school, some professors would decide who'd "make it" as writers and who wouldn't. And *somehow* they always picked people who were just like them. Their predictions were almost always wrong. Which is to say, Chuck Schumer reminds me of those professors.

Pam Keith@pamkeithdc.bsky.social · 3d ago

Here’s the reality about Schumer: He sponsored Alex Vindman, Haley Stevens and Janet Mills. White candidates who BADLY underperformed. He ignored and rejected Angie Nixon, Jamie Davis, Scott Colom and Everett Ness, all of whom GREATLY OVER PERFORMED and got within a hair’s breadth of winning with

"If Donald Trump wants to be Mr. Veto, let's test that out," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren. "The new Democratic majority in Congress should pass bills to make life more affordable and our government less corrupt."

If 'Trump Wants to Be Mr. Veto, Let's Test That Out,' Warren Says of New Red Hat

Sen. Elizabeth Warren urged Democrats' new majorities in Congress to test Trump’s “veto” pledge with bills on affordability, healthcare, and corruption.

commondreams.org

Note to politicos: Oversight and Accountability are not “retribution” or “revenge.” They are necessary for democratic governance - to protect our constitutional order. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

Put up everything you've ever wanted and make him veto it. Tell everyone you'll get all this and more with a Dem prez/Congress in 2028. But also, It think there is at least a 40% chance he signs Trumpcare for All. He wants love and his name on stuff and has no real fixed policy positions.

Kevin M. Kruse@kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 4d ago

The last time Democrats had something like this margin was in the first two years of the Obama administration (257-178), but that majority was soon crushed by the Tea Party wave in 2010. Political power doesn't last forever. Use it or lose it.

I mean y’all if you were wavering on whether the Dems’ first priority should be pitchforks and torches (investigations and hearings), Miller as CoS oughtta do it.

That’s the thing. DOGE didn’t dot any i’s or cross any t’s. They ransacked the govt illegally, destroyed careers, got many people killed, then burned all the documents on the way out the door. Demanding criminal investigations — including of libertarian-god-king Elon — is the moderate position.

Bild

This was an ICE election and a corruption election too, among other things. But this wasn't a “we don't like the economy” midterm. It was “we don't like the economy, and the president *chose* to make it worse.” The former is a midterm like 2022. The latter is almost unheard of modern US history.

Dr. Samantha Hancox-Li@sjshancoxli.liberalcurrents.com · 4d ago

i find it troubling the extent to which the progressive commentariat has settled on "this was an economy election." "this was about inflation." yes, people express extreme anger about the economy. but they are voting like trump just re-started the great depression. this should strike you as odd!

We want hearings. We want subpoenas. We want investigations. We want whistleblowers. We want journalistic exposés. We want key defendants flipping. We want indictments and convictions. We want JUSTICE — and 100% actual accountability for ALL the corruption and crimes.

If Congressional Dems ignore this mandate from the American people to address the rampant corruption by the Trump administration, they'll lose again in two years and deserve it. They MUST send the message that this level of corruption is not acceptable, and will not be tolerated in the future.

Adam Bonica@adambonica.bsky.social · 5d ago

Voters have been telling us for a while that corruption would be the issue of the midterms. The question now is what Democrats are going to do about it, and why most voters still don't trust the Democratic Party to fix it. I’ve got some ideas.

Exit poll results for the question "Regardless of who you support, which party would you say is better able to handle government corruption?" 37% said the Democratic Party, and they voted 95% Democratic and 4% Republican. 30% said the Republican Party, and they voted 95% Republican and 5% Democratic. 32% said neither, and they voted 56% Democratic and 40% Republican.

Voters have been telling us for a while that corruption would be the issue of the midterms. The question now is what Democrats are going to do about it, and why most voters still don't trust the Democratic Party to fix it. I’ve got some ideas.

Exit poll results for the question "Regardless of who you support, which party would you say is better able to handle government corruption?" 37% said the Democratic Party, and they voted 95% Democratic and 4% Republican. 30% said the Republican Party, and they voted 95% Republican and 5% Democratic. 32% said neither, and they voted 56% Democratic and 40% Republican.

Last night was a vindication for the American people - a clear statement that corruption and illegal wars will not stand! Now we must press our newly empowered Dem House and Senate members to do the hard work needed to hold Trump and his cronies accountable, address the needs of regular Americans.

If she loses to Scott Colom, Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith will have helped set her own defeat in motion. He'd likely be a federal judge right now—not her opponent—if not for the fact that she blocked Biden's nomination of him over his support for trans rights. www.mississippifreepress.org/sen-cindy-hy...

Sen. Hyde-Smith Blocks Biden Judge Pick for Mississippi Over Trans Rights, Soros

U.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith is blocking Scott Colom’s nomination to serve as a federal judge, citing trans rights and George Soros.

mississippifreepress.org

THIS. Gerrymandering blocked Dems from gaining unified control over state government in GA, NC, TX, and maybe OH. Nearly 1 in 5 Americans live in those states. Many House races remain uncalled, but my very prelimiary estimate is gerrymandering cost Dems 2 dozen seats—only NC’s map fully fell apart

ElieNYC@elienyc.bsky.social · 5d ago

I said this on @nativelandpod.bsky.social but I'll repeat it here: A dangerous narrative is going to be "the GOP gerrymandering didn't work." NO. It worked GREAT. We just OVERCAME it. But we'd have even MORE seats, and different candidates could have won those seats, without the gerryamndering.

I said this on @nativelandpod.bsky.social but I'll repeat it here: A dangerous narrative is going to be "the GOP gerrymandering didn't work." NO. It worked GREAT. We just OVERCAME it. But we'd have even MORE seats, and different candidates could have won those seats, without the gerryamndering.