Pippa Sterk

@pippasterk.bsky.social

Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Bristol. Interested in queer/LGBT+ pedagogies 🌈 Occasional creative writer, podcaster, film curator, and events producer.

not now kitten, Daddy has to lock in and come up with a joke about Wes Streeting that will get 5 likes on a third-tier social media app

academic group chats are so funny because there'll be someone on there whose monograph completely changed the way you look at life, and once in a while you'll get a text from them like 'there's extra sandwiches in the staff fridge for whoever wants them :)'

Proud to share my article for the inaugural issue of re:wave! In it, I discuss how tempting it is to present 'marginalised' knowledge as a solution to the flaws of the academic status quo, but how we nevertheless should resist this temptation towards simplicity 📚 rewave.press/eating-epist...

Eating epistemologies and tending to tension: against the romance of intellectual ease - Pippa Sterk — re:wave press

re:wave press' main website.

rewave.press

Agree. This is the rub. Students want to skip work with AI but hate when profs use AI to skip work (and vice versa). People want to sell LLM art but don't want to pay money to read other people's LLM art. You want to use AI to write boring work emails, but not receive AI work emails. Etc.

Isabel J. Kim@isabel.kim · 4mo ago

[throws my hat in the AI discourse ring] i think fundamentally the psychological meta girding AI use is that people LOVE to fool others but HATE to be fooled, and people LOVE to not pay for things but HATE to be the one not paid, and people LOVE to steal and HATE to be stolen from.

Same tactics all the way down: -complain that there's no evidence base to prescribe young people puberty blockers. -get puberty blockers banned until evidence is available. -argue that any puberty blocker study would be inherently unethical. It's not about 'evidence' and it never was.

Pippa Sterk@pippasterk.bsky.social · 9mo ago

It put the burden of proving innocence onto the person who is deemed aberrant, while also making any 'proof' impossible or highly degrading to obtain. It's criminalisation by the back door, for the crime of simply existing in a public space as a member of a marginalised group. Truly ASBOs for terfs.

Gonna need the general public + journos to properly reckon with how much of the social/legal policing of space is done purely on vibes. Invoking a 'common sense' approach to who deserves to be in a space, only serves to reinforce who is thought of as the 'common' body and who is seen as aberrant.

Rose Schmits@roseschmits.bsky.social · 9mo ago

She then claims cis people who get “wrongly” challenged “will knkw how to deal with that” and i think the obvious immediate question back to this should be “well how would you prove you are not a trans woman?”

KCL AI policy defines AI as "any technology or system that can reason and/or adapt, sometimes on its own" which is kind of like saying that airplanes can fly 'on their own' because the pilots are not physically pushing the vehicle forward flintstones-style.

This ESEA History Month, let's all do a fun little thing where we're honest and realistic about who events / scholarship / communities are actually for! I know calling something ESEA looks nice on funding applications but some of you are absolutely kidding yourselves

When people talk about the 'sentience' of AI, it just sounds to me like they're admitting that they think of other people as controllable entities that they can feed an input in order to gain a predictable output. Real pickup artist mentality, very gross!

📢 NEW PODCAST EPISODE 📢 We talk to Dr Tania de St Croix and Louise Doherty about their collaborative research project that sought to address the impact of rising evaluation of youth work and how policy threatens the spirit of youth work. www.kcl.ac.uk/its-just-res...

It's Just Research, Season 2 Ep 6: Defending the spirit of youth work

In this episode, hosts Sara and Pippa interview Dr Tania de St Croix and Louise Doherty about their research on measuring the impact of youth work.

kcl.ac.uk

Had a great time presenting at the UCU LGBT+ research conference last Friday, catching up with colleagues I hadn't seen in-person for a long time, and meeting new scholars doing LGBT+ related research 🌈 📚

absolutely wiiiild how often pro-genAI positions within pedagogy are framed as just being 'realistic'. It speaks to such a lack of imagination, trust, and accountability, when it seems a foregone conclusion that students WILL use genAI and there is no way we can put up even the slightest boundary.

The worry that now cis male police officers are going to use the new regulations to strip search cis women (and then claim he thought she was trans) overlooks the fact that strip searching is and has ALWAYS been a way of legalising and legitimising sexual violence.

But, one thing: almost everyone I know is trans, I only know two people with GRCs. It's a barbaric, bureaucratic system with no room for anything that makes life worth living. Once again, we are forced to defend the absolute worst version of what anyone would want. Another world is fucking possible.

having read it, my fellow cis readers, i can tell you that it is 400 pages of "maybe" and "if/then" statements that rely on inference from the maybes. when it does cite data, it's old studies or ones with tiny sample sizes. it uses terms of art in a colloquial sense to obscure meaning. it's trash.

jenny tightpants@jtp.bsky.social · last yr.

i don't even think anyone who cites the cass report as an authority actually read it. it could have just been 12,239 pages of lorem ipsum and its proponents would talk about it exactly the same as they do now

Also it’s extremely non-inevitable if: - it doesn’t work - it pollutes its own dataset - action is taken against illegal data theft - the VC money runs out and it turns out to be prohibitively expensive to use without subsidy - we don’t use it for stuff it can’t do - it’s too environmentally costly

Sebas@ohlookbirdies.bsky.social · 2y ago

Genuinely depressing how many people I see using AI because "it's inevitable so we better get used to it now" It's only inevitable because you're listening to the fuckheads pushing this! You can just not! If no one uses it, it is extremely evitable!

Pls fund me to create a training course where I go round with a buzzer making a loud noise whenever USAmerican scholars fail to declare where their research takes place. The US is not the global baseline, actually! Research done in the US is just as culturally specific as research anywhere else!