p. sampson

@psampson.net

cs phd @ penn, nsf-grfp fellow, spelman alum. 💭 people, platforms, power. they/she. 🧋 🍑 🧑🏾‍💻 https://psampson.net

The logic is that a rising tide lifts all ships. And regardless of all social advances, once again, won through Black liberation movements, we have remained in at the bottom rung of the social ladder. Black women, the backbone of our movements, the most educated demo in USA, remain in a double bind.

I had such a great time co-organizing the CHI workshop on Standards for LLM Use in Human Subjects Research! We had a fantastic turnout and discussion, and we're looking forward to continuing this conversation to produce concrete standards.

image of workshop participants

I don’t think people quite understand that the occupation by ICE in the Twin Cities has more or less erased non-white people from public life. They cannot safely exist in any space accessible to the public and moving between private places leaves folks vulnerable to kidnapping by armed masked goons.

AI companies should be extremely careful not to repeat the many mistakes that have been made — and harms that have resulted from — the adoption of personalized ads on social media and around the web. (4/5)

(2) Give authors of papers the ability to edit the AI-generated summary. Ideally directly, but if that's not possible, to easily request a change. (3) Give authors the ability to opt out of having an AI summary on their paper entirely. (Or require an opt in.)

As someone who has ::checks notes:: 117 publications in the ACM Digital Library, can confirm I was not asked nor told about this. It doesn't appear on ALL papers, and I can't intuit a rhyme or reason to which ones. Maybe I shouldn't be, but I'm legitimately surprised there's not an opt out option.

Artificial Intelligence Tools on the ACM Digital Library
ACM uses Artificial Intelligence tools to enhance your research experience.

Currently, we offer written summaries of individual articles as well as podcast-style audio summaries of conference sessions. We will soon add chat-style interactivity to our content and search functionality. All summaries on the Digital Library are clearly labeled as AI-generated. When citing ACM content, authors should always cite the original article, not an AI-generated summary.

AI can make mistakes, and it cannot replace the experience of reading an article in full. But we do believe it will help you find, understand and use ACM content both more quickly and more deeply.

These tools were designed in consultation with a diverse group of Digital Library stakeholders and will continue to evolve as Artificial Intelligence advances. We are continuously tuning our Foundational Model to optimize readability and we conduct regular audits for hallucinations and other errors. We are very interested in your thoughts and suggestions- please leave them by clicking the "Feedback" button on the far right of this page. If you find a problem with a specific AI-generated summary, please return to that summary and click the Feedback there.

the non-ironic, casual deployment of the white usage of "woke" in news articles and opinion pieces makes me want to scream

I've always felt somewhat uncomfortable with the framing of AI risk around the actions of "malicious actors". Because sometimes the malicious actor is the company that built the thing. And the model is causing harm because it was successfully steered into doing what it's creators wanted it to do.

my hottest educational take is that schools should actively, non-punitively teach students how to admit when they don't know something, aren't sure or have made a mistake, with various teaching frameworks adapted to support this ideal, because people who can't admit fault are breaking the world

the mainstream media has been steadily buying into the idea that science and academia are somehow "captured" by left and liberal ideologues, rather than the more obvious explanation that measured analysis leads people away from reactionary thought

anyway, if your problem with technology was those inconvenient people who do technical work, and how they ask questions, have opinions, take ethical stances, etc. then it might be especially tempting to just replace them with ai. fewer tedious coffees, for one thing.

I catch blocks if I talk about C19 but: There’s a new, more contagious strain spreading—“razor blade throat” is one symptom. But, most spread is SYMPTOMLESS. You DON’T KNOW you’re spreading it. More spread, more mutations & variants—>more disabled & dead. Put a mask on in public. We keep us safe.

Close up of a person wearing glasses and a colorful mask from the brand masklab.

There are 2 previous historical cases of countries destroying their science and universities, crippling them for decades: Lysenkoism in the USSR and Nazi Germany. The Trump administration will be the 3rd. It's not just budgets but research, institutions, expertise, and training the next generation.

Graphs showing 25 years of budgets for the National Institute of Health, NASA, and the NSF. In all cases, the proposed budget for next year is far, far below any year of the previous quarter century.

Few tech critiques have aged as well as Phil Agre saying "Oh come on. Face recognition will work well enough to be dangerous, and poorly enough to be dangerous as well." Obviously lands well beyond face rec.