Rhys Morgan

@rhysm.wales

Bug fixes and performance improvements.

This disingenuous commentary doesn’t help anyone. Frauds start unravelling pretty quickly. That you apparently cannot afford to put your oven or treat yourself is quickly undermined by the question “so why are you spending £50 per week on petrol?” Then, it turns out, she has an agent and /1

Ash@queerash.bsky.social · 2w ago

Elaine in this article "can't remember the last time she used her oven" but also spends £200 a month on petrol (so driving probably ~50 miles a day?) (she's also a professional old person; she was on Good Morning Britain last year, and then also at the Nov budget, and the year before lmao)

I am so sick of this. Reach locally run 20 scare stories a day on benefit cuts on Black Country Live, cos they know fearful people will click This is based on Blunkett musing on possible benefit changes for Neets Not local news, not in fact news just speculation, headlined to scare. For shame.

Black Country alive screen shot with pic of Andy Burnham 

Text: 

The new Labour Party government Prime Minister, Mr Burnham, succeeded Sir Keir Starmer in Number 10 Downing Street on Monday.

Andy Burnham to 'limit'
DWP benefit payments in crackdown for thousands

I’m liking this “one nice policy a day” thing we’ve got going on right now! A marked change from literally just a week ago. If these sorts of things had been woven into Starmer’s time as PM earlier, even if they cost, he might still be PM lol

One reason why back in 2020 I thought Starmer should bring in a PLP social media code of conduct is to minimise the amount of, frankly, pointless hassle, that microblogging causes parties.

(1) this is quite obviously correct. People notice visible homelessness! (2) also - and I want to make this very very blunt and direct here - this is a Labour PM and if you think action to end homelessness won’t play well, well, tough? Maybe you need to go vote Tory instead?

Luke Tryl@luketryl.bsky.social · 2w ago

Seen a few people saying rough sleeping policy isn’t aimed at median public concern. Quite apart from any policy/moral imperative it really is - rough sleeping comes up time again in focus groups as one of the most visible signs of Broken Britain and community decline!

It should have been a point of principle not to give her a job. Aside from the economic stupidity and immorality of the crusade she led at the Home Office, she symbolises the political failure that landed Labour in its current predicament, without which Burnham would not have had his opportunity.

Post nicht verfügbar.

I just feel like constantly, endlessly moving ministers around – especially the handful who are clearly on top of their brief and delivering – is one of the reasons that our country suffers. Nobody gets the chance to learn their trade.

Mel Stride can fuck off. I’m no Rachel Reeves fan, but blaming her for “wholesale mismanagement of our economy” and “leaving us with more challenges than opportunities going forward” is brazen coming from a fucking Tory, whose party are why we’re in this state in the first place.

Did we expect Lammy to go? Also, “I would have been proud to continue serving in Cabinet.” Ooft. I feel like he probably would have been good back as Foreign Sec???

Me normally: It makes me feel squeamish when the government does heavy-handed, authoritarian things. Me when I hear Steve Bray: Send in the SAS and rendition him to a black site on a Pacific island.

Fascinating seeing someone claim that the public has rejected AI slop, when if anything “the public” is its most ardent and passionate creator

OK but genuinely tho, Labour should immediately start legislating against what Farage has done. If you resign, you don’t get to stand in the following by-election.

The tactic is clear: Bulldoze the various investigations into his finances. Recapture the limelight just as Burnham becomes Prime Minister. Win a likely victory to try and regain momentum for Reform UK after a rocky two months.