Ruth Aylett

@ruthaylett.bsky.social

(she/her) Author, poet, socialist, feminist, Heriot-Watt emeritus professor with research in AI, social robotics/agents, affective computing All views personal; likes/shares are not support

@nature.com the anthropomorpizing language of this article as well as the equating of agentic loops with actual employees/scientists without any evidence of that conjecture is deeply insulting to scientists and scientific rigor, respectively. 🧪🧬🖥️

Nature@nature.com · yesterday

"We want to see how far these agent teams of AI scientists can help us to really accelerate drug discovery and development” go.nature.com/3VmT0CF

The fact that interest on illegal donations doesn't need to be returned creates a perverse incentive to receive impermissible donations in the first place. Why wouldn't you, if you can pocket quite significant interest, and there's no sanction if you return it within the legal time frame?

Reform UK Could Pocket Nearly £500,000 in Interest if They Are Forced to Return £72 Million Crypto Billionaire Donations

EXCLUSIVE: Electoral Commission confirms interest earned on impermissible gifts can be kept, prompting calls for Nigel Farage to hand any proceeds to charity

bylinetimes.com

really stressful day at roget’s. you know how they’ve got me in the thesaurus department? this morning my supervisor almost added too many words to the big list of words and nearly hit the sentience threshold that turns our simple book into a fully-thinking (evil) human brain

So how about this for a "pause AI" proposal: "pause credulous AI reporting". No more media about "breakthroughs" or "rogue agent swarms" or ... UNLESS and UNTIL that media demands the actual empirical evidence and/or focuses on the motivations of & harms by these companies.

So then ordinary people, who all have plenty to worry about now tyvm, pick up some generalized anxiety about "AI" and meanwhile policymakers are introducing nonsense bills regulating unicorns (I mean "AGI"). >>