Bear Wilner-Nugent

@saltlick.bsky.social

Lawyer (criminal defense, appeals, civil and administrative litigation), festival operations volunteer, musician, outdoorsbear, cook, lover, dad. You can find my professional contact information at https://bwnlaw.com.

It's funny that no one can name a single so-called Nazi in Ukraine's government, or a far right party in parliament (because there aren't any) Yes, there are some shitty Ukrainians. They have so little support they can't get elected to office.

i don’t want to criminalize speech, people have the freedom to say what they want, but speculating about your own product ending all human life in public should, at the very least, be the kind of thing that you should worry about being fired for

the orange man is bad and he does bad things and you should not have elected him and you should not elect people who support him

the midterms are just one grand exercise in the american electorate finally coming around to the single most accurate political axiom of the past decade: orange man bad

People — including highly respected and accomplished writers — are not being sufficiently critical of the information environment on this site. A lot of smart folks are getting brain worms here, via the familiar mechanism of circular validation of ideas that feel intuitively or emotionally true.

No. This Cory Doctorow post is awful and borders on actual misinformation. The fact that a widely respected voice like him is spreading this kind of false narrative is, again, a giant blaring alarm about the effect the Bluesky info environment is having on people’s brains.

Chip Bayers@chipbayers.bsky.social · 2d ago

This Cory Doctorow post (which started life as a Blue Sky thread) does an excellent job explaining what the bullshit is in the Hugging Face incident, and that the real poisoned information environment is inside the AI community: https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/12/god-in-the-box/#llms-are-fake

the sum total of Sam Alito’s jurisprudence on voting adds up to “You have the right to vote for a Republican and if you aren’t likely to vote for a Republican, then Republicans are allowed to disenfranchise you.”

the truly crazy making part of all of this is that voter fraud EFFECTIVELY DOES NOT EXIST. you have a better chance of finding an actual leprechaun at the end of the rainbow than of finding evidence of voter fraud that influences an election

Jay Willis@jaywillis.net · 4d ago

Genuinely an insane paragraph from Sam Alito. “Voter fraud is real and scary and we have to stop it, so the fact that implementing Trump’s mail ballot rule will disenfranchise millions is legally irrelevant.” Brain melted. A right-wing podcaster in a robe. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

___, (slip op., at 9) (internal quotation marks omitted).
As for the equities, the Government has a strong interest
in enforcing the rule, and implementing it will also “en-
hance the visibility of Federal Ballot Mail” in order to better
detect election fraud. 91 Fed. Reg. 54972. On the other side
of the balance, the plaintiff States invoke the practical ef-
fects of implementing the rule close to the midterm elec-
tions. I take that problem very seriously, but it is not
enough to convince me to deny the application.
First, as the District Court acknowledged, the States dis-

If you think having to vote for someone advocating for the NCAA’s 2015 athlete eligibility policies is intolerable, wait until you find out what FDR and LBJ voters had to live with

We saw it this weekend with Nader dead-enders -- nobody is willing to defend the intention or impact of his actual campaign, it's all "he was a smol bean who ran for no reason and could not have mattered." Completely unserious -- own what he actually did or shut up! bsky.app/profile/lemi...

Scott Lemieux@lemieuxlgm.bsky.social · 6d ago

The most common defense of Nader's transparently indefensible campaign is essentially "if multiple factors are responsible for a contingent outcome then none of them [or only the ones I don't like for other reasons] are responsible." This is really stupid

I think the argument that it would be better for anyone on any time horizon for Paxton to win is ludicrous, but if that's what you believe then at least stand up for it. Don't do this "I'm just saying don't vote for the Democratic candidate, what heppens is out of my hands" chickenshit nonsense

One of James Telerico or Ken Paxton will be the next senator from Texas. If you're telling people not to support Telerico, you're saying you want Paxton to win. That's it. You cannot select a different, third bespoke person to be senator like buying a tailored suit.

I can't stand this kind of "I'm not saying I want the Republican to win, I'm just saying I want the Democrat to lose" evasive non-sequitur, but it's also a dispositive tell that the person making the argument knows perfectly well that they're advocating an indefensible position

Bild
AdotSad@adotsad.bsky.social · 5d ago

This site is legitimately unhinged and unserious. Trump really isn't perceived as being that bad based on what I'm seeming from this site cause there is still absolutely no urgency to stop his party from staying in power. Maybe we need 20 years like Orban got for people to get serious