Scott_Boyd_Lab_Stanford

@scottboydlab.bsky.social

Scott Boyd Lab for Human Immunology Research at Stanford University.

Anyone that has been around a lab knows that the trainees really drive the research, while most professors just sort of guide the ship. Most innovation comes from our trainees. Old professors like me will be able to survive these cuts, but our young scientists and our future will be destroyed.

Bild

Researcher Amita Gupta has spent more than a decade planning and running a $70-million trial to study a new tuberculosis drug, enrolling ~6,000 participants in 13 countries. It might all have been for nothing. That's because a new NIH policy has abruptly cut off billions to trials abroad. 🧪

NIH grant cuts will axe clinical trials abroad — and could leave thousands without care

US agency’s new policy could abruptly end studies of infectious diseases and cancer, leaving researchers scrambling for funds.

nature.com

I can’t exaggerate how badly this will affect our field, also internationally since many missions are jointly funded with eg ESA and JAXA. We are basically pinning our hopes on congressfolk to fight for all the regions that will lose jobs, since the science isn’t winning any arguments. 😢🔭🧪

Dr. Jessie Christiansen@aussiastronomer.bsky.social · last yr.

First the rumour was a 20% budget cut. Then, 50%. Now the president's NASA budget is out and it's a 68% cut to astrophysics ($1.5B to $487M). Even if this gets reversed in four years, we will *never* recover the missions, partners, people who will be gone. www.washingtonpost.com/science/2025...

Many outstanding medical researchers at NIH threatened by non-renewal of contracts: www.science.org/content/arti... They give the US new discoveries & the economic benefits of doing the risky first steps toward innovative cures. Harming medical research is a self-inflicted national injury.

NIH ban on renewing senior scientists adds to assaults on its in-house research

Policy follows firings of tenure-track scientists and suspension of training programs

science.org

I am happy to announce our new paper "Univariate-guided sparse regression". It's a new lasso that leverages the signs and magnitude of univariate coefficients . Sparser and more interpretable than the lasso. We're excited! arxiv.org/abs/2501.18360 R: github.com/trevorhastie...

Univariate-Guided Sparse Regression

In this paper, we introduce ``UniLasso'' -- a novel statistical method for sparse regression. This two-stage approach preserves the signs of the univariate coefficients and leverages their magnitude. ...

arxiv.org

This is heartbreaking. But not an unfamiliar feeling for my science colleagues and my own lab who burnt the midnight oil 24/7 studying COVID immunity to understand how to protect American lives during the pandemic. Nonsensical, performative betrayal. No one will actually benefit and people will die.

Senator Patty Murray@murray.senate.gov · last yr.

Gregg is a former Marine and Forest Service ranger. He's saved the lives of hikers dangling off a cliff or going through cardiac arrest, and he's bravely fought forest fires to save small rural towns. 100% of his salary is paid by WA state. Elon fired him. Share his story.

NIH-supported research saves lives: here are two "poster" human beings to prove it. Emily Whitehead: cured of her leukemia by CAR-T developed at Penn. Victoria Gray: major symptoms of her sickle cell disease resolved following CRISPR gene editing - path paved at Boston Childrens, UW, UC Berkeley.

Bild

The 22 state AGs note that in 2017, Trump proposed a similar across-the-board rate cut, but Congress rejected it. In 2018 & every year since, Congress has enacted an appropriations rider forbidding NIH from pursuing an across-the-board rate cut.

Case 1:25-cv-10338 Document 1 Filed 02/10/25 Page 4 of 59
6. In 2017, during his first administration, President Trump made a budget proposal
that would have reduced the indirect cost rate for research institutions to an across-the-board,
categorical rate of 10%. Congress unequivocally responded to ward off such a change to the
calculation of indirect cost rates. In 2018, Congress enacted an appropriations rider prohibiting
HHS or NIH from spending appropriated funds "to develop or implement a modified approach to" the reimbursement of "indirect costs" and "deviations from negotiated rates." Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-141, 132 Stat 348, § 226. That rider has remained
in effect through every appropriations law governing HHS to this day. See Further
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, Pub. L. No. 118-47, § 224.
7. On February 7, 2025, NIH nonetheless issued a guidance document pronouncing
that all indirect cost rates for NIH grants would be reduced to 15%, in Notice Number NOT-
OD-25-068, Supplemental Guidance to the 2024 NIH Grants Policy Statement: Indirect Cost
Rates (the "Rate Change Notice"). This reduction applies not only to new grants but to existing
grants, and becomes effective on February 10, 2025, just one business day after the Rate
Change Notice issued.

Why should the public care about the freeze on the NIH? Aside from the need for scientific pursuits to make our society better… -For every dollar we invest in NIH research, there is a $2.5 return. -Research dollars help fund universities that employ non-academics. (1/)

My replies are perpetually full of anti-vaxxers these days telling me about polio vaccines. Not shockingly, most of what they are saying is wrong. Luckily, I trained with Vincent Racaniello & he taught me a few things about poliovirus. So let’s discuss the king of the Picornaviridae👇🏻

Picture of a plaque assay (purple field with clear holes) showing gorgeous poliovirus plaques