shambibble

@shambibble.com

"i'm the same boy i used to be"

for a banal example, the fact that anthropic will simultaneously publish long diatribes about the risks of AI surveillance and then contract out Claude for Palantir to resell to CBP is psychotic, and there is no reason why i should take any of their moral protests seriously while they do that.

you missed the part where this meant 1) This problem was unsolvable, because this had to be a method of solving it, so 2) His power level just wasn't high enough yet, so you needed to 3) Do genetic engineering to raise people's power level, which mostly meant making them more like him

Bild

bernie sanders is writing a bill that will, in effect, turn over AI governance to the judicial branch, as it currently exists. this strikes me as... not a good idea. certainly not unless a democratic admin can forcefully resurrect humphrey's executor

• Banning Artificial Superintelligence so no person or entity may develop or deploy Superintelligent AI systems. “Artificial Superintelligence” means:
o An artificial intelligence system that exhibits or can easily be modified to exhibitcapabilities that match or exceed human cognitive performance and capabilities across a broad range of domains or tasks.
o Or AI systems that have sufficient capabilities to plan and execute the disempowerment of humanity, including by overthrowing or undermining the U.S. government.
• Pausing advanced AI development until a new, federal AI regulatory body is up and running and has established clear rules and model review processes to ensure safe and secure development and deployment of AI.

i'm gonna be sad once every other lab follows dalle/mj/flux in sunsetting negative prompts, its one of the quickest ways to orient yourself in a new latent space and you can push around goopy booby anime models a lot more with them without violating no-name bushido

four goopy AI anime imagesfour less goopy AI anime images in a sketchy marker-like style

crockett endorsed talarico via tweet so at this point she's done as much as haley has; the real question is whether haley, in october, is still giving national interviews where she declines even to reiterate that and speculates loudly about WWC enthusiasm for el-sayed

Post nicht verfügbar.

reposting @keytryer.net here because i feel like for visual AI the "do it, pussy" hurdle still seems near-insurmountable (i have various personal experiments that i've held back due to my own standards, unlike the average "MARVEL IS OVER" slop poster)

@KeyTryer
I think people who are into AI video just need to prove that AI video is better by making good AI video, if they really are in this asymmetrical power position, rather than whining every time one of these dudes says something like this. That's all they have to do.
[quoting]
@taherdhanera
Guillermo del Toro DECLARES WAR on AI - Says Users Are Erasing Generations of Real Artists..

I literally dislike this chap.

Guillermo del Toro is acting like the biggest gatekeeper in Hollywood. He just fears the competition. He knows that newcomers will outperform him and tell better stories. The people who didn't get a chance before are now finally going to shine like stars.

this is a weird form of status quo bias. currently inference works in some way which is arbitrary with respect to quality or truth, and they change it to a slightly different arbitrary way. Gruber insists the first arbitrary way must be the right one. buddy, calm down

the biomedical section of dario's manifesto is both incoherent (lol @ thinking "telling grad students" is any kind of bottleneck) and doesn't match anthropic's actions; as far as i know they haven't invested much in the physical robotics side of things. reads as cope for the in silico attrition rate

But I think that pessimistic perspective is thinking about AI in the wrong way. If our core hypothesis about AI progress is correct, then the right way to think of AI is not as a method of data analysis, but as a virtual biologist who performs all the tasks biologists do, including designing and running experiments in the real world (by controlling lab robots or simply telling humans which experiments to run – as a Principal Investigator would to their graduate students), inventing new biological methods or measurement techniques, and so on. It is by speeding up the whole research process that AI can truly accelerate biology. I want to repeat this because it’s the most common misconception that comes up when I talk about AI’s ability to transform biology: I am not talking about AI as merely a tool to analyze data. In line with the definition of powerful AI at the beginning of this essay, I’m talking about using AI to perform, direct, and improve upon nearly everything biologists do.

One way to make somebody start to question your reporting: Illustrate the story with obvious AI slop. As you can see at the link below, F/A-18s are not nearly that big relative to a U.S. aircraft carrier, and Boeing does not make a half-size version you can squeeze on one side of the flight deck.

airpac.navy.mil

MeidasTouch@meidastouch.com · 4w ago

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Military families and service members are now describing horrific conditions across MULTIPLE ships: human waste flooding bathrooms, virtually no food, water or soap, months without port calls, exhausted crews, and no end in sight. This crisis is far bigger than just the Lincoln.

kinda funny that the things that happen to "bother" me about these images, and thus correct in post, also seem to be what bother the pangram detector. i'm doing my part for the RLHF tho

three AI slimegirls with submachine guns being passed as "No AI", with a pop-over "Submit your comments" box describing them as "3 superimposed gens + stamp outline + surface blur + some color levelizing + bicubic smooth reduction"

i can split the difference here: AI can be creative, and the story since 2022 or so is labs making them less so, for Business reasons. turns out intelligence is jagged and sharpening the helpful assistant/cracked coder jags gives you Elara Voss novels and ghost kitchen menus

Ethan Mollick@emollick.bsky.social · last mo.

I find arguments that AI can't do judgement or creativity or taste to be especially obviously false in the time of agents. Any long task requires lots of taste, judgement & creativity. I am much more sympathetic to arguments about the quality or diversity of the AI's taste, judgement, or creativity