Steve Ammidown

@stegan.bsky.social

Vivant (sans bon). Archivist-for-hire, romance novel historian, freelance writer about romance history. Every story deserves to be heard. He/Him. Blog: romancehistory.com Podcast: blackromancehistory.com

Why would you believe the thief who stole all the inner components of the car and then frankensteined it together when they tell you that the car is sturdy or safe to drive? “ai” “detectors” aren’t real. Stop legitimizing them.

Gentle reminder for all that if you have books that are water damaged, crawling with bugs, physically broken, or giving you travel advice for a country that hasn’t existed since the 90s, you can safely throw them away, you don’t need to make them your local thrift store’s problem.

Using lists of three is not an "AI tell." It's a common trait in human writing because our brains biologically want to make sure there's always one thing to marry, one thing to fuck, and one thing to murder.

That sudden realization that the guy who was arguing with me yesterday probably knows my cousin who’s connected to the same department. It is a small world, after all.

I work at a public library. People who want to use AI seem to have no trouble doing so. People who don't want to use AI have a harder time. I crowdsourced and then finalized this document "How to disable or avoid intrusive AI" and then gave it a short URL: notoai.org Please pass along if it's useful

An aircraft passenger oxygen mask: a drop down passenger mask with air bag and yellow plastic mouth and nose cover, oxygen tube has been cut; Demonstration model used by flight attendant crew for passenger instruction. Has text on the side indicating that it's non-functional.

I still get hung up on “people using AI to write are bad, but using AI to analyze people’s writing for supposed AI usage isn’t.” It feels like we’re so obsessed with the gotcha we don’t care who’s doing the gotchaing? Am I weird for finding this paradoxical?