Mariana Colín

@themorbidzoo.bsky.social

Ambivalent YouTuber and PhD Candidate in Communications/Media Anthropology at UIUC. Cohost of Once More With Feeling, a podcast about movies and their remakes.

It cannot be stated strongly enough that both mainstream political parties and the center that exists between them think of you not as an equal contributor to society, but instead as a whiny peasant who has to be mollified by occasional acts of charity.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 7d ago

Gallego: "This whole DSA, progressive stuff -- that is the field of nerds. The everyday voter doesn't think that deeply about the interplay of our politics. They care about the cost of school supplies going up."

RIP Dolly Parton ❤️ Here's a lovely Dolly story: We worked together on "Transamerica." She told me that the bible passage that used to puzzle her the most was, "the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men." She said, "How the heck do you sin against the Holy Ghost, and-

i promise there are tenured conservative humanities and social sciences profs at -- *checks notes* -- johns hopkins. but also, yeah: you either believe in peer review or you want unqualified conservative scholars for diversity(!) purposes. i hate using "DEI" ironically, but here we are.

Asheesh Kapur Siddique@asheeshks.org · last wk.

Viewpoint diversity is the opposite of peer review. You should not be leading a university if you don’t believe in peer review asheeshksi.substack.com/p/producing-...

The fact that conservative scholarship is underrepresented in our institutions ultimately means that the left gets flabbier because it’s not being tested and challenged in the way it ought to be. At the same time, the right, to the extent that it moves outside the university and finds itself in think tanks and is not subject to challenges or critiques from the center and the left, becomes more radicalized. This is not just a problem for our institutions. It’s a problem for America. So I do feel urgency in trying to remedy this issue. It was my colleague Steve Teles, who wrote in The Chronicle about this, who said he was hard pressed to identify a single tenured conservative scholar in the social sciences and humanities at Hopkins. I took that as a very serious critique

Reality is more of a negotiation than a result of individual observation. We co-construct it, there is no making sense of anything without other people. If this weren’t true social media wouldn’t be so successful, btw. It hijacks and exploits our epistemological reliance on others

Hagen Blix@hagenblix.bsky.social · 2w ago

The better AI gets, the more (and more subtle) AI psychoses we're gonna see, especially among intellectually inclined people. Not because the machines make you insane, but because it's becoming painfully obvious that sanity isn't just an individual-level property, but something social, ...

One of the most telling things about this whole Cofnas situation is that the people signing the letter aren’t framing this issue in terms of defending his right to say *wrong* things in academia, but instead to say *bad* things in academia. There are only two ways to interpret this: 1/2

If your position is that we have to let the racists in because, who knows, racism might be true, then what you are saying is you think it’s possible that academia has been in a unified conspiracy to suppress the truth of racism for the past 3 generations. This is a flatly racist position to have.

Ted McCormick@tedmccormick.bsky.social · last wk.

refuting every claim anybody makes is not in fact how science, or any discipline, works discarding approaches that have proven fruitless or wrongheaded, not stopping to re-litigate them every time someone digs up a junk data set or a retracted article they wish were true, is how disciplines move

So about that wild horse slaughter thing: it shouldn’t happen, it violates the spirit of the law, but BLM has been sending horses to slaughter for decades, because, get this, the use of a good horse has plummeted in the past 100 years and they are underfunded and drowning in horses, 1/2

If you want people to engage with a technology you care about, you have to find ways to frame it around providing them with some agency. You also have to be ready for people to just say "fuck you, no" and be OK with that. You have to learn to center people and not the technology itself.

“unlike those woke virtue signalers protesting genocide cause its popular im doing the hard thing by defending a racist on principle”

I place a lot of value on viewpoint diversity (the real one) and on free speech (the real one). It sucks how both concepts have been hijacked to mean “everyone is under a moral obligation to elevate and disseminate discredited claims if today’s political right is into them.”

Nicholas Grossman@nicholasgrossman.bsky.social · 2w ago

I don’t think a good definition of “viewpoint diversity” is “you must lower your standards specifically for anti-science, anti-truth, bigots, and fascists — a healthy intellectual community needs those voices and they can’t clear the bar otherwise.”

doc vivi hits the nail on the head here. im not a dummy. i know how computers work. i watched LLMs with interest as they emerged, i know enough about the math to get what's going on, and quickly became disillusioned with how oversold this garbage is. sorry kids, it IS "spicy autocomplete"

Doc Vivi's Personal Account@personalvivi.bsky.social · 2w ago

I literally worked on IBM's Watson and have zero interest in using LLMs for my work. Stop assuming we're all just ignorant. I know more about them than you do. I know more about them than 99% of people on this site do.