Dr Christina J. Colclough

@thewhynotlab.com

Advocate for reshaping the digitalisation of work & workers | Founder of The Why Not Lab Ethics of AI, workplace data & AI governance, data rights. FRSA, member of OECD & UNESCO expert groups on A.I. Trade unionist. Live in 🇩🇰, work 🌏 www.thewhynotlab.com

🤑 We pay. You pay. Palantir doesn’t. A new report finds that #Palantir is paying little to no corporate tax in Europe while expanding its influence over public services, policing, defence and national security. 💲 Public money in. Almost no tax out. Read the report: www.epsu.org/article/pala...

Palantir pays almost no corporate tax in Europe while benefitting from public contracts: new report

A new report reveals that Palantir is paying little to no corporate taxes in Europe while building massive profits and share value off the back of public contracts.

epsu.org

🤑 Public money should serve the public good - not Big Tech. A new briefing from @thewhynotlab.com and Hannah Johnston sets out six principles for public procurement that protects digital sovereignty, workers’ rights and democratic control. Check it out 👇 www.epsu.org/article/publ...

Public procurement must support digital sovereignty, not corporate control

Billions of euros are spent every year on digital and AI systems - yet EU procurement rules still provide too few clear principles for how these systems should be bought with public money.

epsu.org

@thewhynotlab.com urges unions not to wait for regulation - act now. Map where AI and digital systems are used, hold management accountable, and draw clear red lines. Collective bargaining is our strongest tool to shape a fair digital future. 💪🤖

Bild

Trade union ideas for realising AI opportunities: 🤝🏽 collective bargaining 💡worker led innovation 👷🏽 AI to enhance work ⚖️ equal outcomes ❤️ protect human values and creativity 🌎 sustainable growth 🪑 seat at the table for worker reps 📃 update laws 🔥empower people

This -- once again, people aren't against *technology writ large*. they're against technology that is at best stupid, at worst evil, made by the same set of billionaire men whose track record of prior tech has decimated whole industries and made people worse off

Faine Greenwood@faineg.com · 2y ago

What angers people about AI? They don’t want to be forced out of their jobs. They don’t want to feel like their public interactions are being used to impoverish them while making some asshole rich. I believe we can find a way to work backwards from there on regulating and controlling AI.

most people want a quick and simple answer to why AI systems encode/exacerbate societal and historical bias/injustice and due to the reductive but common thinking of "bias in, bias out," the obvious culprit often is training data but this is not entirely true 1/

Curious about how the 40-hour workweek became standard? 🕒 In a Social Science History paper I investigate which political parties pushed for—or resisted—working-time regulations from the late 19th to the 20th century.

Bild

We are automating jobs that many present and future workers rely on for an income. We must ask what the long term social consequences of this will be. Great article here from @nytimes.com Robots Struggle to Match Warehouse Workers on ‘Really Hard’ Jobs www.nytimes.com/2024/11/19/b...

Robots Struggle to Match Warehouse Workers on ‘Really Hard’ Jobs

The machines can load and unload trucks, move goods and do other repetitive tasks but are stymied by some, like picking items from a pile.

nytimes.com

Take a wild guess who appointed that judge. That’s right — Donald Trump. Thanks to him, 4 million people will no longer get a raise. It’s far from the first time he’s cheated working class people out of their money, and it certainly won’t be the last.

Post nicht verfügbar.