Tjibbe Donker

@tjibbed.bsky.social

Infectious Diseases Modeller at University Hospital Freiburg, working on antibiotic resistance, hospital-acquired pathogens, and patient referral networks. www.tjibbedonker.nl

Very interesting preprint on how badly LLMs do peer review "All tested LLMs lacked both sensitivity to errors and specificity, recommending major revision or rejection for papers [...] published in top journals" The tendency to reject is influenced by the prompt, with "revisions" judged favorably

Philip N Cohen@philipncohen.com · 2w ago

LLMs, asked to "peer" review 200 papers published this year in top science and medicine journals, either rejected or recommended major revisions 76% of the time. Telling the LLMs the paper was a revision paper made them much more generous. arxiv.org/abs/2610.31414

A serious weakness in this paper by King and Worthington: The judges for the AI peer reviews are *not* experts in the field. They are former journal editors but no claim is made to substantive expertise in the reviewed papers. AI-generated reviews sound good *if you don't know the substance well.*

description of human judgespaper text

The world is literally burning. All because the oil industry got us all addicted to burning their product. In other news: Airbus and Qantas flex about how they are able to fit an additional 20.000 liter of fossil fuel into an airplane: www.theguardian.com/business/202...

Qantas plane flies for more than 24 hours in record-breaking flight

The A350 landed in Toulouse 24 hours and 24 minutes after leaving Melbourne as airline plans direct London service

theguardian.com

We're on a long trip in our EV, and more than ever before, non-EV drivers are (literally) lining up to ask questions about charging speed and costs. Not a lot of questions about range this time... I guess it's a matter of priorities.

Nouvelle publication, avec la participation de Laura Temime, directrice du laboratoire MESuRS, sur les réseaux de soins et la prévention de la propagation des bactéries multirésistantes (RAM).

I don't think I've ever talked on Bluesky about why I hate the Foo Fighters and Dave Grohl. Don't read any further unless you're prepared for uncomfortable truths about the "Nicest Guy in Rock", and his very substantial body count & subsequent cover-up.

Dave Grohl, throughout the years.

This motherfracker wants us to prove a negative. In science, you can prove a negative about causation by showing the causal pathway does not exist. “Vaccines do not cause autism” has been proven in every scientifically meaningful sense. Read on. Thread [1/9]

Bild

The CDC updated its vaccine page to claim "vaccines do not cause autism" is "not evidence-based" and studies were "ignored." This is an outrage. Decades of research have found no link. This isn't science, it's RFK Jr. using the CDC as propaganda. Children will die because of this.

CDC disinformation about the link between autism and vaccines

Exciting news from the Future Forests Cluster of Excellence at the University of Freiburg (@uni-freiburg.de)! 🌲🌳 Applications are invited for two (7-year) positions in the Socio-Ecological Systems Modeling Lab of the Cluster: 1️⃣ Modeling Coordinator 2️⃣ Scientific Programmer Find details below 👇

“Basically, no matter what anyone tells you, a plug in hybrid is just a more complex petrol car. You are always either hauling a useless engine around or hauling a useless battery around. It will require the same amount of servicing as any petrol or diesel vehicle, it has 1000s more components…

Robert Llewellyn@bobbyllew.bsky.social · last yr.

I have scrawled a measured critique of petrol hybrid vehicle promotion. I think I might have opinions llewellyn.substack.com/p/hybrid-sch...