Luke VanderHart

@vanderhart.net

Trying to build good things. he/him. Sic semper tyrannis

It’s worth noting that Taco Bell identified the source before the FDA did, and promptly pulled it from their stores. The FDA didn’t even name the source until Taylor Farms outed themselves, and hasn’t issued a recall. Basically, Taco Bell is now a more reliable authority than the FDA.

Forbes@forbes.com · 3w ago

Taylor Farms, which supplies major fast food and grocery chains, was identified as the possible source of the cyclosporiasis outbreak Thursday.

Even if you believed AI could do this, why would your default takeaway be "30% unemployment" vs "3-day workweeks for all"? Capitalists so brain-wormed they can sooner envision the end of society as we know it than sharing some of the benefits of new tech with their employees.

Downtown Josh Brown@downtownjoshbrown.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Dan Schulman is the new CEO of Verizon and he is predicting 20 to 30% unemployment within the next 2 to 5 years due to AI. Not a typo. He thinks 1/3 of people currently employed will lose their jobs by 2030.

This is a must-read series of articles, and I think Kyle is very much correct. The comparison to the adoption of automobiles is apt, and something I've thought about before as well. Just because a technology can be useful doesn't mean it will have positive effects on society.

École des Bro-Arts@aphyr.woof.group.ap.brid.gy · 4mo ago

I’ve thought about this a lot over the last few years, and I think the best response is to stop. https://aphyr.com/posts/420-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-where-do-we-go-from-here

Seeing a fascist get democratically defeated after 16 years (despite doing their best to consolidate power) is immensely hopeful. All is not lost. All is never lost.

It's really important to keep in mind that for any output, a LLM would just as happily say exactly the opposite given different inputs. To me, this is pretty strong evidence that while they are capable language machines, they are not "intelligent."

Luke VanderHart@vanderhart.net · 4mo ago

So that's good (because sycophancy is cognitively hazardous) but it doesn't ultimately solve the problem. My ideal "thought partner" agrees or disagrees because it has opinions and ideas of its own, not varying levels of RHLF for different styles of response.

🚨New preprint and our results are rather concerning.. We find the "boiling frog" equivalent of AI use. Using large-scale RCTs, we provide *casual* evidence that AI assistance reduces persistence and hurts independent performance. And these effects emerge after just 10–15 minutes of AI use! 1/

Bild

I hope that more techies start getting into philosophy and not just for a random quote to use at conferences by some writer you’ve never read any work from, but to start thinking more broadly about the social impact of new technologies.

Sentence. Carriage return, carriage return. Sentence. Carriage return, carriage return. Sentence. Carriage return, carriage return. These people think their writing style is so badass and emphatic, when even their cadence is a cliche. I'm so sick and tired of this tired format.