Zoë McLaren, PhD

@zoemclaren.bsky.social

Visiting Scholar @NYUniversity. Associate Prof. @UMBCPubPolicy. Formerly @UMichSPH. Econ PhD @UMich. Health and economic policy to fight HIV, TB & COVID19.

Also the window between infection and "Too late, all we can do now is keep you from spreading the virus further while you die horribly and painfully" is *very small*. So go and go NOW.

To echo this: if you were at this petting zoo, go to your local ER and explain you had a possible rabies exposure. Untreated, a rabies exposure is 100% fatal. Like, not "maybe you'll die", it's "you will die in weeks & it will awful the whole time you're dying." Do not mess around. GO TO THE ER!

Holy shiiiiiiit if you know anyone in North Carolina who may even know anyone who knows anyone who's been to an event by these people, get them to go get the rabies post-exposure prophylaxis shots RIGHT THE FUCK NOW, DO NOT WAIT, YOU CANNOT TREAT IT AFTER SYMPTOMS START

Kelly@broadwaybabyto.bsky.social · 16h ago

Rabies is 100% fatal if untreated. Please help spread the word about the exposure at the Farm Adventures mobile petting zoo in North Carolina. The vaccine is incredibly effective and will save your life. Also…. Rabies at a petting zoo!?!? www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...

Here are more captive Democratic fundraising spam donors. Again, there are thousands of cases like these. 82yo from OK: $300K across 22K donations 87yo from RI: $286K across 19.5K donations 84yo from NM: $24K across 2.5K donations 73yo from CA: $521K across 28K donations

A data graphic detailing recurring political donations by an 87-year-old Rhode Island resident charged 19,528 times since 2018 for a total of $286,595. The top timeline chart tracks daily donation frequency during the donor's busiest stretch from January 2020 through March 2021, showing sustained giving throughout late 2020 and early 2021 that peaked at 153 charges in a single day. The bottom horizontal bar chart displays the 12 largest recipients out of 552 total committees and campaigns—led by End Citizens United ($9,730 across 1,809 charges), the DCCC ($21,155 across 1,540 charges), and Progressive Turnout Project ($7,759 across 900 charges)—noting that the top 10 recipients account for 36% of all donations, with the remainder scattered across 542 other entities.A data graphic detailing recurring political donations by an 82-year-old Oklahoma resident charged 22,251 times since 2018 for a total of $298,967. The top timeline chart tracks daily donation frequency during the donor's busiest stretch from August 2023 through October 2024, showing persistent daily activity that spiked to 74 charges in a single day in April 2024. The bottom horizontal bar chart displays the 12 largest recipients out of 411 total committees and campaigns—led by Let America Vote PAC ($7,337 across 1,036 charges), End Citizens United ($3,984 across 723 charges), and Stop Republicans ($6,017 across 646 charges)—noting that the top 10 recipients represent just 26% of all donations, with the rest distributed across 401 other entities.A data graphic detailing recurring political donations by an 84-year-old New Mexico resident charged 2,484 times since 2018 for a total of $24,487. The top timeline chart tracks daily donation frequency during the donor's busiest stretch from April 2025 through June 2026, showing steady, repeated charges that peaked at 17 in a single day in November 2025. The bottom horizontal bar chart displays the 12 largest recipients out of 224 total committees and campaigns—led by candidates Hakeem Jeffries ($2,155 across 329 charges) and Adam Schiff ($1,393 across 196 charges), followed by the Democratic Party of New Mexico ($1,457 across 138 charges)—noting that the top 10 recipients account for 55% of all donations, with the remainder spread across 214 other entities.A data graphic detailing recurring political donations by a 73-year-old California resident charged 28,374 times since 2019 for a total of $521,876. The top timeline chart tracks daily donation frequency during the donor's busiest stretch from December 2023 through February 2025, displaying heavy, continuous activity throughout 2024 that peaked at 80 charges in a single day in June 2024. The bottom horizontal bar chart shows the 12 largest recipients out of 524 total committees and campaigns—led by Progressive Turnout Project ($21,042 across 1,079 charges), the DCCC ($25,782 across 871 charges), and March On PAC ($17,656 across 821 charges)—noting that the top 10 recipients account for just 23% of all donations, with the rest distributed across 514 other entities.

I appreciate that Dolly Parton refused to participate in "dress respectability" and, by her own account, modeled her aesthetic after a town "tramp," who she thought was beautiful. She separated aesthetics from character and understood "classiness" to be about how you treat people, not how you dress.

her very existence was an indisputable reminder of how many things framed as inevitabilities were actually just someone’s choice. there actually is enough money for everything. the wealthy could fully fund literacy and public health and the arts and child welfare. they just won’t

Luke O'Neil@lukeoneil47.bsky.social · 5d ago

By almost any measure Dolly embodied "the American Dream." Some people will come from nothing and make it big and consider the problem now solved. Others will remember that there are still others with nothing and use what they have to help.

I'm putting in my tenure application on Oct. 1 and need to demonstrate my work's reach and impact. If you happen to have assigned any of my works to your students would you mind emailing me the syllabus? ajbauer2 [at] ua [dot] edu

the other thing is that most of the DSA program would be net money positive up to like the top decile. my federal taxes would probably go up 50% under Medicare for all but zeroing out healthcare costs would more than compensate

the abbot of unreason (a returned archaeologist)@merovingians.bsky.social · last wk.

the average well-off DSA organizer is basically organizing to pay higher taxes the rest of their life and in a society where that level of selflessness is pretty rare I don't think anyone should be giving them shit for it

here is the thing. if you tell me that you believe that race is a biological category and that it is a guide to the objective superiority and inferiority of groups of people, i am not calling you a racist to *insult* you, i am calling you a racist because it best describes your beliefs.

Aparna Nair@disabilitystor1.bsky.social · last wk.

not only that, they are demanding that they not be called racist when they are observed to be signing up to support the racist

Watching Prime Minister Carney discussing the breakdown of the Canada-US trade deal at a press conference and just really appreciating living in a country where the leader can speak coherently and knowledgeably about what is actually happening.

I once worked at a university that gutted an entire (very popular and useful) learning center and replaced it with two guys who would teach you how to host blogs. every student had to have a blog. Every single one. Our syllabus had to mention blogs. We had to teach WITH blogs.

Rachel Ernst @rachelernst.myatproto.social · last wk.

I cannot begin to count the amount of technology tools I have been told in the last 20 years that I need to teach my students how to use because they were the future. 95% of them are gone. A tool is a tool.

Can I also add that we actually work during the summer? I've had at least two different people ask me what I'm doing with my time this summer since I'm not teaching. (And I'm an associate dean.) 🙄

The thing about Polio wasn't the deaths it was the disabilities. Polio took healthy young men and permanently disabled them often in very visible ways and that scared the fuck out of people in a very ableist society. My friend's dad had polio, and it left him with one leg shorter than the other.

Hoodlum 🇺🇸@nothoodlum.bsky.social · 2w ago

This is a very dangerous lunatic. RFK Jr: “The polio vaccine "killed many, many more people" than polio ever did.”

I'm sure it is bad when cyclists intentionally do things that make themselves or others less safe but that is a completely unrelated conversation unless you're pointing out that good bike infrastructure makes it significantly less likely that cyclist behavior will impact other people in any way!