Alex J-W

@alexjw.bsky.social

Maths educator. Often confused by the world. Follow me if you are interested in maths and stats education or professional development in general.

Simple fact. Right populists are not held to the same standards as others. Whether in the UK or other countries. You wish it different. But it isn't. And it probably won't be, because that's where most of the big money is heading these days.

With all respect to the BBC, the reason this story "matters" is not about whether it distracts from Reform's conference. It "matters" because it is important our leaders are not conspiring to break the law.

"[A] democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism—ownership of Government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power." - FDR (1938)

a man stands at a podium with microphones that say wor on them

ALT: a man stands at a podium with microphones that say wor on them

media.tenor.com

All of this scrambling to be ahead of the queue on AI readiness is of course downstream of tech giants launching something without ethics or safety research (and often ignoring or firing ethicists who pushed back within their companies) meaning it landed wholesale on an unready scrambling market

This is an important point and also holds true (with somewhat different political and structural context) for Europe, too. Nowhere is looking to soak up lots more academics, there's no demand (at an institutional level) for a larger pool of faculty / staff — any movement from the US displaces others

Ted McCormick@tedmccormick.bsky.social · last wk.

missing context for stories like these is that Canadian universities are in a crisis of their own -- including McGill, which recently laid dozens of staff and faculty off this isn't about Canada's enthusiasm for bettering the human condition; it's about poaching stars while casualizing the rest

RE: freedom of speech, academic freedom, and race science. In this (long) thread, I’m going to 1) establish my bona fides on academic freedom and race science, 2) show why academic freedom and freedom of speech are different and… 1/34

Teach to the test was already understood to be a massive problem in national education systems in, like, the 80s. That's forty years ago. Making those tests nationally standardised and having admission to every structure after them determined by them is not, in fact, the solution.

Meta paid its lowest effective federal tax rate in company history last year while raking in record profits. Earlier this year, Meta began laying off 8,000 workers as it ramps up AI investment. Zuckerberg is now worth $190 billion. The irony of a Big Tech King buying a castle is not lost on me.

Meta’s Zuckerberg buys 19th-century castle in southeast of Ireland

Strancally Castle was built around 1830 on land overlooking the River Blackwater and underwent extensive renovation in 2

nbcnews.com

This is part of a pattern where a new, transparent thing is set up because of a terrible, opaque thing, and there’s a media response of “we found something suboptimal in the new thing [thanks to the transparency], therefore it should be shut down.” The thing is worse in the terrible, opaque thing!

jon ben-menachem@jbenmenachem.com · 2w ago

there is a repeated media cycle across cities where concerned citizens hand-wring about the costs of alternatives-to-police programs (be careful not to compare those sums to the historical police budget tally!) www.startribune.com/minneapolis-...

On BBC Radio 4's Moral Maze tonight: “Slavery - Right or Wrong?” Some people say it’s morally wrong. On the other hand, it makes a tonne of money. On the panel: Edward Colston, King Leopold II, Tommy Robinson and Matt Goodwin. Join us as we discuss one of the great moral dilemmas of the day.

I compared The Great ADHD Myth? to an earlier Channel 4 documentary — The Great Global Warming Swindle (2007) — in my newsletter today. It looks like they have even more in common. That one also featured contributors being wildly misrepresented.

Robin Ince@robinince.bsky.social · 3w ago

We wondered on @cosmicshambles.com podcast whether Professor Katya Rubin knew how her interview was going to be used , well, surprise surprise (remember this was the documentary that Channel 4 boasted was “science led”)

Expert reaction to the TV show 'The Great ADHD
Myth?'
*NEW COMMENT* Prof Katya Rubia, Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, said:
"My own contribution to this programme has been largely misrepresented as my comments were cherry-picked, truncated and presented out of context to make them fit into the programme's narrative that ADHD does not exist and there is no brain basis to the social construct.
The claim that ADHD is not a disorder of the brain
"It is true that with current technology (which might well change in the future) we cannot diagnose ADHD children based on a brain

Only just found out about this For the record, you don't get multiple genetic markers and one of the most effective medications known to science with 'social constructs' Channel 4, this is, in scientific parlance, an absolute fu*king disgrace that will genuinely endanger lives #c4 #ADHD

New Channel 4 documentary, The Great ADHD Myth?, seeks to determine whether ADHD is a genuine neurodevelopmental disorder, or a social construct