Arjun Raj

@arjunraj.bsky.social

Just another LLM. Tweets do not necessarily reflect the views of people in my lab or even my own views last week. http://rajlab.seas.upenn.edu https://rajlaboratory.blogspot.com

Thank you. My colleagues and I are pleased that we developed a system that works and that 11 years and over 100 papers #gastruloid papers later, what we felt in the final paragraph of the paper is coming along. There is now a community improving and learning from the system.

Bild
Kevin Mitchell@wiringthebrain.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Symmetry breaking, germ layer specification and axial organisation in aggregates of mouse embryonic stem cells journals.biologists.com/dev/article/... - what a gorgeous paper this is! (2014 from @amartinezarias.bsky.social and colleagues - introducing 'gastruloids'!)

I had two undergrads in my office today working on a computational project. My normal advice in research is to use tools to their fullest to get to the cutting edge. For the first time, I was reluctant. I worry that using coding agents would rob them of something. And I’m fully AI-pilled.

napari 0.7.0 is available now! 🚀🎉 It's a BIG release so read the full release notes, with highlights: napari.org/stable/relea... We want to thank everyone who has worked incredibly hard on this release including our 11 new brilliant contributors 🤩 and the community for their support and feedback!

napari 0.7.0

Mon, Mar 23, 2026 We’re happy to announce the release of napari 0.7.0! napari is a fast, interactive, multi-dimensional image viewer for Python. It’s designed for browsing, annotating, and analyzing…

napari.org

A question for biologists: we often talk about evolutionary novelty. What does “novelty” mean for you? What’s your favorite definition if any? Or just a rule of thumb for what is and isn’t novel.

Scientific publishing: Rethinking how research is reviewed and published Review of how the loss of impact factor affected submissions at eLife - uneven drop across countries, but generally holding up remarkably well and shows a new model is possible elifesciences.org/articles/110...

Scientific Publishing: Rethinking how research is reviewed and published

Taking a radical new approach to the publication process resulted in eLife losing its impact factor, but authors, reviewers, editors and funders support the journal and its efforts to reform scientifi...

elifesciences.org

A moment of introspection on how much the world has changed during the time between the initial submission and this (hopefully final) revision: "This paper seems so quaint now" "Let's think of it as having contributed an important bit of high-quality training data to Opus 4.7"

Ran an AI coding workshop with the lab. There was a palpable sense of sadness realizing that skills some of us have spent our lives developing (myself included) are a lot less important now. I see the future 100%, but I do think it's important to acknowledge this sense of loss.

Reffsin, Miller, Cherry & Raj et al. discover that intrinsic cell states determine which cells become infected with SARS-CoV-2. Using single-cell clone tracing, they identified a TIG1-high state marking highly susceptible cells. What makes these cells vulnerable? 👇🏻 1/3

I am happy to share that I’ve been awarded tenure here at Columbia University. Alhamdulillah. I thank my wife, parents, mentors, colleagues, friends, and family. I thank my lab members, present and past, for entrusting their careers in my hands and making this a thrilling journey.

Bild

To me, the mean loud position here ranges between ignoring the ai and wishing to fully ban it. The latter won't happen (I don't think even regulation is technically feasible), the former is massively unproductive. If scientists refuse to participate in the discussion,it will just be driven by others