Bungo Akiyoshi

@bungoakiyoshi.bsky.social

Studying kinetochores in African trypanosome (kinetoplastid) and marine plankton (diplonemid) in Edinburgh https://www.ed.ac.uk/biology/groups/akiyoshi

Finally back to Edinburgh (is summer gone?). In this trip, I had a chance to talk to various people (scientists and non-scientists). A highlight was to visit a rice farmer. Reminded me of the importance of meeting new people and communications in general

Congratulations to Tom Deegan who receives the Colworth Medal in 2027! Pioneering work from the Deegan Lab has redefined our understanding of eukaryotic DNA replication and provided conceptual and technical frameworks that continue to drive new discoveries across molecular biology.

Dr Tom Deegan from University of Edinburgh awarded The Colworth Medal by The Biochemical Society 2027 Awards.

🆕T. brucei Kozak sequences are unusual, hard to detect, but important for translation regulation - Check out the work conceived💡, carried out🔬and written up ✍️ by Philip Stettler, with only a minor contributions from me and the Polacek group - CONGRATULATIONS🎉👏 academic.oup.com/nar/article-...

Kozak sequences regulate gene expression in Trypanosoma brucei

Abstract. The Kozak consensus sequence around the AUG start codon of mRNAs allows efficient cytosolic translation initiation in eukaryotes. It has not yet

academic.oup.com

I have officially started my new position as a Senior Research Scientist at the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) 🇯🇵. My new research group will focus on the cell/molecular biology of parasitic Excavata & amoebae (incl. Trypanosoma, Naegleria, Acanthamoeba, & more) (1/3)

Bild

Do we grow wiser as we age? I spent 15+ years chasing glam journals, wasting time and energy (and frustrating my team and co-authors). I don’t want to wake up at 70 and realize my life went into convincing a few editors my work was trendy enough. Enough. I’ll try to be smarter.

I am learning a lot from this debate about the last eukaryotic common ancestor. It's thought-provoking to have competing hypotheses and perspectives argued out there in the open. Here, the two arguments are internally consistent, yet different conclusions... so where's the wrong assumption?

Bungo Akiyoshi@bungoakiyoshi.bsky.social · 6mo ago

I appreciate the comments by Max Raas, Eelco Tromer and others on my paper published last year "Hypothesis that ancestral eukaryotes sexually proliferated without kinetochores or mitosis". However, I do not think their critiques can reject my hypothesis. For details, please read the paper. 1/n

If I claimed this liquid-to-solid phase transition assay on a pure protein in vitro predicts the same transition to happen in cells, what counterarguments would you raise? Would the same counterarguments apply to a liquid-to-liquid phase transition assay on the same pure protein in vitro?

Bild

I am fully aware of that. Yet, I do not consider it problematic because (with respect) I do not feel that the current protein-sequence-based phylogenetic approaches can solve the root position. In my paper, I wrote my reasonings including my criticism on your Williamson 2025 Nature paper.

Andrew Roger@andrewjroger.bsky.social · 6mo ago

I would point out that no rooted phylogenomic analysis supports a root within the Euglenozoa. So regardless of the alternative results published, this is a point of agreement in all of them.

Our views are totally different. I think my approach is more valid, and you think your approach is better. A critical issue I have with those phylogenetic papers is that they all say their root is fully supported by their statistical analysis, yet reaching different conclusions. What can I trust?

Max Raas@maxraas.bsky.social · 6mo ago

That is what I meant to convey in my skeet. This is why robust and statistical sequence-based analyses are in our view much more informative. And these consistently group Euglenozoa together as a single, monophyletic group.

I appreciate the comments by Max Raas, Eelco Tromer and others on my paper published last year "Hypothesis that ancestral eukaryotes sexually proliferated without kinetochores or mitosis". However, I do not think their critiques can reject my hypothesis. For details, please read the paper. 1/n

Max Raas@maxraas.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Recently, a Hypothesis was posed in @jcellsci.bsky.social in which the root of eukaryotes was placed between kinetoplastids and all other eukaryotes. From this, it was implied that LECA did not have a kinetochore. We argue this is highly unlikely. A 🧵(1/12) Read our reply here: tinyurl.com/n87myhpr