Damien Moule

@damienmoule.bsky.social

Toronto municipal policy wonk, engineer, urbanist, father. Consider donating to effective charities: https://www.givewell.org/

During the Cabbagetown daycare wars, where a daycare didn't "fit the historic character/use" etc (nor did a playground shade structure) I wrote that all cars parked along the street were also not inline with heritage character so parking should be eliminated. No no no...not that. Not that.

Jordyn Marcellus@jordynmarcellus.ca · 4h ago

Heritage conservation policy is a tool homeowners use to extract ever-greater real estate wealth from everyone else. This post has the receipts. Also: how does an inground pool reflect Rosedale's late 1800s/early 1900s suburban character?

I don't think the solution to Toronto's problems is more meetings. I appreciate Moise moving on things like pedestrian Church or daycares. If people turf him over "insufficient consultation" (not getting their way) or 🙄 developer donor claims, Toronto will be cooked in the doing stuff department.

How wildly different ideas on homelessness are shaping the election in this downtown Toronto ward

Concerns about drug use and public safety are the top issue in the race for Toronto Centre, with candidates offering vastly different solutions.

thestar.com

A picture of a ward struggling with the iron political equilibrium of Toronto: we don't build enough housing or shelters because the suburban low rise neighbourhoods refuse to take either. So everything gets concentrated downtown. Also featuring pointless factional fight on the left.

Ben Spurr@benspurr.bsky.social · yesterday

From me today: How homelessness, public safety — and wildly different visions — are shaping the election race in Toronto Centre www.thestar.com/news/gta/in-...

I wasn't an eligible Toronto voter back in the Transit City days so I've always been a little unsure how that plan made it so far. But looking at how the EELRT has become completely accepted across the board despite being awful maybe the answer is right in front of me.

Isaac Callan@isaaccallan.bsky.social · yesterday

Olivia Chow in Scarborough, highlighting campaign promises on transit. Among the promises is a pledge to get shovels in the ground on the Scarborough East LRT before the end of the next council term. "Chow has made it the City’s top transit priority," her team says. #ToPoli

Before (2025) / After (2026) Rue Julien Lacroix in the 20th arrondissement of Paris. Many car parking spots were removed for some greenery. One of the last changes done in the pre-election rush in the first half of 2026, actually completed a few weeks after the election.

Bild

I think an article that is (intentionally? not sure) pointing out the discrepancy between the learned helplessness of senior city staff and the vast powers the city has but doesn't use to create more housing.

Alex Bozikovic@alexbozikovic.bsky.social · 4d ago

TLDR: Toronto can make it easier to build new housing. Not the opposite. Some city people want to frame this as a complicated matter of “collaboration.” It’s not. www.thestar.com/real-estate/...

You can’t constrict a market such that the maximum zoning envelope becomes the market minimum and then disclaim responsibility for the zoning envelope by saying it’s the market’s choice. This is only valid under abundance. Until then, codes are actually responsible for thinking things through!

Airgap Your Mind@austinmusicscene.bsky.social · 5d ago

The beauty of the market is that you can choose whether to live there. No one is sentenced to dwell here. Some folks won't care that much and will be fine. The people who do care can avoid, move, or sell if it's that important to them.

I like the Ringer podcasts, think they're good etc. But laughing my head off at them talking about the Man City scandal and thinking that the UK economy couldn't withstand losing the UAE investment into a soccer team.

They both feel like they were concocted by a small group of residents, who lost an election, in a place called the Crooked Cue but I haven't checked Google Maps in Edmonton to verify the situation there.

I am going to try and maintain consistency: what's wrong about Alberta re-imposing legal suburbanism on Edmonton is that suburbanism is deeply illiberal and economically damaging. Local democracy vs. Provincial democracy is more complicated and I come down ambivalent.

Dan Williams: "we're going to make sure we don't have a Toronto or Vancouver policy in Edmonton". Toronto or Vancouver, WHERE THEY BAN ROWHOMES IN NEIGHBOURHOODS. This brings us down the path of Canada's largest cities with housing crises.

"We don't like tall towers and really big developments. Also, and this is key, we don't like small proposals and gentle density. Oh, almost forgot, we want everything to be affordable, but you better believe we're also against those initiatives too."