Daniel P. Moriarity

@dpmoriarity.bsky.social

Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology @ UPenn | Quant-curious | Lv. 11 Dwarf paladin Inflammatory phenotyping, physiometrics, precision psychiatry Statistics, Transparency, + Rigor Editor @ Psychological Science

Citing a previous ProPublica investigation, House Democrats pressed VA Secretary Doug Collins for answers in a letter last week about how the agency’s mental healthcare has been increasingly strained under the Trump administration.

House Democrats Demand Answers From Trump’s VA on Vets Struggling to Access Mental Healthcare

A letter from Democratic lawmakers to VA Secretary Doug Collins cites a recent ProPublica investigation that found hundreds of therapists have left the agency and vets often aren’t getting the help…

propublica.org

The challenge is that the blast radius is *very* large. For instance, a colleague scored 1% on an NIH grant that was denied for reasons undisclosed. The research was not controversial; it was fundamental research into basic brain mechanisms. Another e.g., NSF cuts. www.science.org/content/arti...

Exclusive: NSF slashes research programs to support new tech initiative, insiders say

Unexpected shift in funds has meant sharp drop in grants this fiscal year

science.org

I'm curious to hear what others are thinking. We talk a lot about the need to fight for science (yes!) and trainees (yes!) and supporting one another (yes!) and the fear that labs will shut down (tragic and horrible!). But less around the question: How does this change your next-few-years-plans? /5

US scientists: Going into fall 26, how are you thinking about things? Following Fall 24 events and a tumultuous spring 25, I remember a convo with a colleague in which we agreed we just needed to wait things out until fall 25 and we'd have some clarity about the landscape (eg for funding). /1

🚨 SIPS Executive Committee elections are coming up! 🚨 Nominate yourself or someone else for one of the open seats. We value diversity and encourage members from all backgrounds to nominate themselves. Visit the link to learn more and submit your nominations by August 23! 🗳️🔗

SIPS Executive Committee Nominations 2026

We are currently soliciting nominations for the Executive Committee of the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science. Any member may be nominated, and self-nominations are welcome. SIPS…

buff.ly

I will say that, as much as I've tried to grapple with this with respect to my own work and how I optimize/prioritize, starting a lab and having conversations about productivity vs. quality has definitely thickened the existential miasma on this topic...

Aidan Wright@aidangcw.bsky.social · 5d ago

One thing I struggle with is the fact that we seem to publish way too much as a field, and yet there are so many things that are left unexplored. Or things that need to be tested for generalizability and robustness. Not sure entirely sure how to balance these competing demands.

It was pretty recently that I was posting here in defense of Claude, specifically that it wasn't a threat to or an impact on my writing. But I've noticed recently that it *is* affecting my writing, via changes in phraseology. "Load bearing" and "by construction" are the clearest examples.

I'm so happy to announce version 2.0.0 of my #Rstats package WeightIt is out on CRAN! New features: censoring weights, multilevel propensity scores, improved weights for continuous treatments, bias-reduced ordinal and multinomial models, M-estimation in subgroups Check out the website below!

Weighting for Covariate Balance in Observational Studies

Generates balancing weights for causal effect estimation in observational studies with binary, multi-category, or continuous point or longitudinal treatments by easing and extending the functionality ...

ngreifer.github.io