cameron tonkinwise

@camerontw.bsky.social

transition design, service design, design philosophy, finitude - most of my occasional thinking these days takes advantage of the slightly longer form afforded by the truly awful linkedin, sorry: https://au.linkedin.com/in/cameron-tonkinwise-80a5987

might have to return to a thought I had a couple of years ago--- about the prospect of deacademicization, a process as unexpected and sudden, and tagged with as cruelly unpronouncable a neologism, as the deindustrialization that set in in the 1970s.

"ai psychosis" is better understood as "automated cult dynamics" which is why I've decided to start calling them auto-cults Your cousin who got real into chatgpt and said he transcended physics didn't "get ai psychosis" he joined an auto cult

Teenage mutant ninja turtles logo, except it says automated cult dynamic
Anthony Moser@anthonymoser.com · 3mo ago

this is a good look at how what people call "ai psychosis" is more usefully understood as a kind of automated reproduction of cult behavior (endless affirmation like love bombing, maximizing for engagement & isolating from others, mirroring & amplifying delusions, encouraging harmful behavior)

Trump II has profound consequences that will last a century: -destruction of administrative state & civil service -extreme wealth concentration, tech oligarchy -climate rollbacks -end of rule of law w/o pushback incentivizes future backsliding -Iran Pundits hate this because it sounds shrill

Peter@notalawyer.bsky.social · 4d ago

also, describing a lack of legislative capacity as a point against authoritarian consolidation misses the point: the defining feature of Trump’s second term is consolidation of power in the *executive* - the lack of legislative authorization makes him more authoritarian, not less

At the moment, Trump 2.0 has no great popularity, no legislative capacity, no policy legacy that a Democratic successor can't easily roll back.

So many scams succeed because someone knew how to design a website or a graphic in a way that made people believe it was legitimate and now you can do that at scale, as many times as you want, with AI generated slop, it’s so dangerous.

What if instead of starting substacks in twenty-fucking-twenty-six people learned to give one iota of a fuck about whether they want to associate themselves with nazis.

So, ok, a thing about telling yr audience "i use AI for my info gathering/research but then I look over it and fix any errors" is that you unfortunately told me youve outsourced your knowledge base on this subject to the machine, and therefore I have no reason to believe you CAN catch those errors

It's always funny to me how people equate LLMs to other, less understood things. We don't know how neurons make consciousness, but we absolutely know how LLMs work. They are not a black box. They are intricately designed, often public white boxes. There's no consciousness because we can look at it.

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ@olivia.science · 3w ago

Many, and especially he, love to do that. So glad others see it too. More here from me on this including many more collected examples in the appendix: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

Marco Rubio: "You fellas don’t want ta listen to these goddamn reds. Troublemakers—they’ll get you in trouble... Might be a good idear to go... we got to clean out this camp. An’ if it gets around that you got reds out here—why, somebody might git hurt." [Grapes of Wrath, Penguin, p264]

“There’s nothing you can do about it. That’s progress, it’s the future.” No, that's *power*. This stuff is being rammed down our throats by people with a financial interest in us swallowing the slurry. Don't pretend this is providence or the hand of god.

Listening to story about LLM-assisted math problem-solving and thinking about how LLMs work best with restricted (smaller vocab, specified meanings) languages – e.g., coding, but also powerpointing, uni admissions essaying, etc), suggesting mathematics are just types of restricted languages.

But the U.S. is nowhere close to setting the global research agenda anymore, and it’s starting to show. People in other countries don’t take it for granted that American scholarship matters anymore. English as a lingua franca at global conferences is on seriously shaky ground.