We are writing to the Prime Minister, and the Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, calling for an immediate public inquiry into the British press, following the tragic death of Jason Arday. Sign here 👇
Jason Arday Letter | Good Law Project
Commission an immediate public inquiry into how to ensure a responsible press given its contribution to Dr Arday’s tragic death.
goodlaw.social
This is a complete distraction. Ireland cannot build a nuclear power plant fast enough to matter. Making a decision to do so would excuse punting on all the wind and solar things it can and must do. This is a lobby project of the tech industry to have something to say when building data centres.
Ireland considering nuclear power as Government attitude shifts amid fresh energy crisis www.irishtimes.com/environment/...
"Accusations of plagiarism in Arday's work were first voiced by Cofnas - a US researcher whose role at a Cambridge college was terminated after backlash to his view that under a true meritocracy black people would "disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sport & entertainment".
Re Jason Arday, this is the person who started the whole offensive - a racist former academic called Nathan Cofnas www.bbc.com/news/article...
The British media's complicity with Wakefield cannot be understated, they were lockstep championing him
The doctor who claimed that vaccines cause autism lost his medical license for faking for the study. But his lies and the damage he did to public health persist long after his paper was pulled. This is why science communication is so difficult; all it takes is one grifter.
yoshitaka amano's poster art for the 2006 tokyo performance of don giovanni
Forst time I've seen someone cosplay one of Testament's Succubi, which I also voice! Very very cool!!
I met @ghaspey.bsky.social at Animate!
while rebuilding my PC, turns out I still have that video of the phone game with the greatest character lines you've ever heard saved reposting this banger here so people don't think im having a stroke when i quote it
A certain AAA studio told employees that their internal gen AI was trained only on local data, but whenever said employees tried to generate an image of a woman holding a gun, it generated Lara Croft. The studio was not Crystal Dynamics, and had never worked on the Tomb Raider IP in any capacity.
I just want to mention: Even if your AI somehow runs locally and you think it's okay, it's still using trained data from a pre-existing dataset which is still full of stolen work. The sheer amount of data gen AI needs is in the hundreds of thousands, you can only get that by scraping
i can't reply to each QRP critiquing what i wrote but i am genuinely glad it's brought up debate/concern about how we look at art. for those considering it in good faith, thank you. there's no point arguing with willful misinterpretation, but i did want to respond to these common points for now:
thinking about the popularity of so many "redraw trends" and plagiarism of compositions by all sorts of artists (it comes up often for gposing but 2D artists do it too). i have to sum up my discomfort with it as follows: it's artists treating other artists the same way A/I treats art as data