@ew6389.bsky.social

Here for UK immigration news and solidarity

There’s no two ways about it: people who are kicked out of hotels DO end up on the streets. Any homelessness charity will tell you that. The Home Office, as ever, working at cross-purposes with the rest of government including Burnham's pledge to end rough sleeping. share.google/FKI5MxyRARSc...

Mahmood infuriates fellow ministers by failing to reveal impact of UK migration shake-up

Home secretary’s colleagues fear homelessness will rise as a result of changes to the asylum system

share.google

As Home Secretary, Mahmood is imposing such massively inhumane policies they go further than Braverman/Patel. That these are pushed by a Labour government doesn't make them better than the hideous policies of the last government. Labour is now the most anti-immigration government in living memory.

Not a single news outlet has reviewed its coverage of Jason Arday, for accuracy or proportionality. Zero attempt to conduct any inquiry into the media’s role in his death. Instead, the industry has moved into self-congratulatory mode. This isn’t just tone deaf, it betrays a systemic failure

Bild

Last week I called on the UK Government to mark Black History Month by acknowledging the inhumane crimes that Britain inflicted on African people for centuries, the ongoing impact of those crimes on the Global South, and the need for slavery reparations.

Depressed by the xenophobia around us? 🧚 Escape to the 17th century where theories compete to answer the question HOW TO ATTRACT IMMIGRANTS ? - my new article in International #Migration & Integration (2026). doi.org/10.1007/s121...

How to Attract Immigrants? Pull Factors in Past Theories - Journal of International Migration and Integration

The push-pull theory is regarded as a modern framework in migration studies. This article challenges this view by tracing debates on attracting and retaining foreigners back to the seventeenth century. It compares four major economic theories and their policy prescriptions concerning immigration. Mercantilism held that to be wealthy, a sovereign state should possess gold and a large population. The article explores three other theories: cameralism, physiocracy, and classical economics. While cameralists held similar views to mercantilists, physiocrats and classical economists fundamentally disagreed. But did their theoretical disputes translate into divergent immigration prescriptions? This article shows that despite disagreements on wealth, money, and population, the four theories converged on an “overlapping consensus” regarding migration. After reviewing the major authors of each school, I reconstruct their arguments around three dilemmas. First, should migrants receive equal rights with natives or be privileged over them? Second, what is the nature of pull factors: are they political (rights, tolerance, freedom, participation), economic (fiscal relief, subventions), or social (cultural ethos, language, respect), geographical (climate, distance, mobility infrastructures)? Thirdly, what are the limits of attracting immigrants: are there numerical limits or socio-professional requirements, like skills selection? Although answers were similar across theories, these debates remain understudied in contemporary migration theory.

doi.org

This drives me bonkers cause UK Citizenship isn’t easy, or free, or automatic. It is a process, an expensive one, and many people who are eligible for years still don’t get it. Burnham and his gang are lying in a way no different to Farage on EU migration. A lie to achieve xenophobic policy.

Sir Almaviva@ilcontealmaviva.bsky.social · 4d ago

Isn't it amazing how the government can keep repeating the false claim (one could say the lie) that settlement is automatic, and no one in the media will ever challenge it?

since when did settlement get granted automatically because I’m pretty sure I had to pay £4k and also fill out a pretty long application and provide about a dozen pieces of paper evidence and also live here for a fucking decade and pay visa fees and health surcharges the whole fucking time

Sir Almaviva@ilcontealmaviva.bsky.social · 4d ago

"The home secretary is right, ​in my ​view, ⁠to bring forward changes that are based on ​the principle that settlement ​is ⁠a right to be earned, not just something that is granted ⁠automatically," ​he said. "And she'll ​set out the final conclusion soon."

It's really important to pay attention to the fact that Lula beat the fascist candidate not by compromising and trying to meet fascist voters in the middle, but by sticking to his guns, promising prosecutions for election interference, and mobilising his own voters to turn out in greater numbers.

Mahmood’s immigration minister, Jo White: “I don’t want us to get into that spiral where people move out of the care sector because they’ve got leave to remain.” In other words, keep them on insecure visas as bonded labourers. I think she just doesn't like them.

Jonathan Portes@jdportes.bsky.social · 7d ago

"The Home Office has identified a new problem with migrant care workers. The people presented as a burden on Britain because they earn too little have become so indispensable that they must be prevented from finding a better or higher-paid job." ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...

"The Home Office has identified a new problem with migrant care workers. The people presented as a burden on Britain because they earn too little have become so indispensable that they must be prevented from finding a better or higher-paid job." ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...

Unaffordable? No, indispensable. The government tries to move the goalposts for care workers - UK in a changing Europe

Jonathan Portes argues that the government has flipped from treating migrant care workers as a problem to presenting them as a necessity,...

ukandeu.ac.uk

First she seemed to oppose the reforms, now she fully supports them, she mentions citizenship when the reforms are about indefinite leave to remain, she appears to suggest that currently people do not contribute (when they have to pay a lot of money on visas, IHS and ILR application fees). Awful.

Zack Polanski@zackpolanski.bsky.social · last wk.

Miatta can clearly see right from wrong but she's rowed into line twice with a Labour government siding with Shell and Donald Trump on climate vandalism, and into line now on cruel immigration reforms. What is the point of Labour if they can't even do the basics to protect people and the planet?

Today I made what was meant to be a self deprecating remark. I fully support our home secretary and the governments positon on migration reform. As I said earlier this week, its absolutely right that people should have to make a contribution to this country in order to earn citizenship

It's important to be able to separate legitimate concerns about genuine problems that people (often incorrectly) associate with immigration from pure gutter racism like this, which we should call out instead of lionising as vox populi.

On Legitimate Concerns

Problems, Policies and How To Parse Them

dmitryopines.substack.com

Jonathan Portes@jdportes.bsky.social · last wk.

Enoch Powell level bile and lies from the Times www.thetimes.com/comment/the-...

While Ms Rayner and some of her more credulous colleagues on Labour’s back benches buy this “moral debt” argument, the British people, who are cannier about such things, do not. For decades, they have watched on helplessly as the complacency and incompetence of successive governments have allowed the number of foreign-born people in this country to soar to 13 million, a ­staggering one fifth of the population. In London, some 40 per cent of people were born abroad. An estimated 900,000 people live here illegally.