Dr. Heather Leslie

@heatherleslie.bsky.social

Learning Designer. Purveyor of pedagogy. Educator. Lifelong learner/forever student. #ungrading Humanity not AI

> There was no outbreak of oligarch support when Timnit Gebru […] was fired from Google in 2020 for refusing to take down a research paper she had co-authored. […] Her findings were buttressed by another researcher, Abeba Birhane, who co-authored a paper called “On Hate Scaling Laws for Data-Swamps”

Dr Abeba Birhane@abeba.blacksky.app · 2w ago

Artificial intelligence is capitalism’s final destination -- Arundhati Roy www.equator.org/articles/aru... 🧵

Anthropic is out with new nonsense about Claude (or the collection of models called Claude) deserving moral consideration and/or be able to feel distress, so my inbox is filling up with journos asking me to comment. I've also got a day job, so here is a brief set of public comments on this: >>

we have a policy for the use of genAI at the @aial.ie. we reflect on values key to scientific integrity, such as replicability, and err on the side of not using it blogpost: aial.ie/blog/gen-ai-... pdf: zenodo.org/records/2322...

A flowchart that guides reflective thinking around generative AI in the context of research. It highlights key, interconnected values underpinning scientific integrity, alongside practical and wider socio-political considerations when deciding whether to use generative AI for research.
AI Accountability Lab @aial.ie · 3w ago

At the @aial.ie, we collectively reflected and deliberated on the merits of the use of generative AI in research. Our collective statement and Lab Policy can be read here: aial.ie/blog/gen-ai-... zenodo.org/records/2322...

you don’t hold "AI" accountable; you hold AI developers, vendors, and corporations that profit off it accountable holding "AI accountable" is like holding a toaster accountable. it's an inanimate object. it doesn't have wishes, feelings, or desires

> Why should I use this technology? Does this tech­nology help me solve a real problem in my work? Are there external factors (e.g., financial incentives) pressuring me to use this technology?

Charles Logan@charleswlogan.bsky.social · 3w ago

In today's @civicsoftech.bsky.social post, David Stroupe, Niral Shah, and Aman Yadav reflect on our recent co-authored article and the problem of "A critical optimist position [that's] clear-eyed about the harm technology can cause while maintaining the belief that technology can improve education."

“Students want to be involved in climate action, in environmental literacy, in green careers…They’re often doing the work already but don’t have the recognition. They didn’t see a sort of pathway to continue that work and embark on that as a potential career.” www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...

More than 1,200 Colorado students have earned a climate ‘seal’: ‘We’re the ones growing up in this world’

A statewide initiative pairs climate-focused coursework with community service – and is spreading to other states

theguardian.com

"If you set up a machine such that any question you put in will lead to an answer coming back out…you are setting up a view of the world and of knowledge that says, 'All questions have a discrete, knowable, objective answer,' and that's just not true and has no place in education." ❤️😍💯

Emily M. Bender@emilymbender.bsky.social · 4w ago

I really enjoyed recording this one, having met Maggie and Shahir at a workshop in August about teaching critical thinking in STEM in the current environment. www.rustbeltscience.com/episodes/pis...

This is your reminder not to let those joyless fucks convince you that human experience, knowledge, intellect, and art can be reduced to a pre-chewed paste of stolen labor.

Just because you/I don't understand AI doesn't mean that no one does. So many people buy into this 'poorly understood' line that lets commercially-motivated tech companies off the hook for harms & near-catastrophes. Kudos to @emilymbender.bsky.social & @timnitgebru.blacksky.app for this.

Bild
Tamara Kneese@tamigraph.bsky.social · 4w ago

Once again it’s @timnitgebru.blacksky.app and @emilymbender.bsky.social bringing AI panic back down to earth. For the love of god people please listen to them

This is such an important point: > AI boomers vs. doomers: A false dichotomy It's exhausting within academia too with people who claim that the technology has good purposes we're ignoring, when everybody sensible knows so-called desirable properties are a function of the labour and days theft.

AI boomers vs. doomers: A false dichotomy

The AI cult’s adherents are no more monolithic in their beliefs than followers of any religion are: there are many subgroups who vigorously debate and contest each other’s beliefs. Yet these subgroups share enough common beliefs that we can usefully group them into a single category, even as it is helpful to understand the main theological disputes between the different currents. Indeed, Gebru and Torres describe the disparate strands behind each letter of “TESCREAL” as a “bundle” of “interconnected and overlapping ideologies” with roots in 20th-century eugenics. Émile Torres’s newsletter helpfully summarizes the bundle’s commonalities and differences:
Nathalie Maréchal, PhD@nathaliemarechal.net · last mo.

May I interest you in an explainer written just for this circumstance? www.techpolicy.press/what-policym...

I’m seeing a lot of posts about talking to your sons in light of the Cornell article. And yes. Talk to your sons. Here are some things you should say, based on anti-violence research about what they need to hear:

Happy Autumn Equinox 🍂🍁✨ I’ve been doing some research on regenerative schools and programs and thought I would share some examples that stood out to me, and that I have personally had the opportunity to collaborate on. medium.com/@heatherlesl...

Regenerative Education Schools and Programs

I have been researching regenerative schools and programs, that is, schools and programs designed using regenerative principles, immersive…

medium.com