フラジークHLADÍK・ラジムRadim

@hlageek.bsky.social

Sociologist at @flu-cas.bsky.social / @czechacademy.bsky.social interested in computational approaches to science, culture, knowledge, and communication. #rstats @requal.bsky.social developer

I suffered through Kratsios' answer to Science: the Endless Frontier. The NYT summary is good, but there's more to it. And I should say that I welcome improvements to the scientific enterprise (which is why I'm participating in @alondra.bsky.social and Jenny Reardon's Public's Science project). 🧵

Trump’s Plan for Science: More Money for A.I., Less for Universities (Gift Article)

Michael Kratsios, President Trump’s science adviser, proposed overhauling how the government funds research. Democrats said Mr. Trump’s actions had weakened science.

nytimes.com

1. A short thread on the Trump / Kratsios "Golden Age of Science" report, the claim that scientific research has become less disruptive over time, and a paper about NIH's inadequate funding of novel science written by none other than the current director of the NIH, Jay Bhattacharya.

I was struck when I corrected data for inflation and population growth. In no way is Trump policy a correction of some overreach. The Biden years were middling for science funding in the 21st century. This is retrenchment to a time before most Americans were born. grant-witness.us/posts/2026-0... 🧪

A line graph titled "Cumulative NSF Funds Awarded Per Capita (2024 dollars) by Day of Fiscal Year" shows inflation-adjusted per-capita NSF funding from October to September. A color-coded legend groups lines by decade from the 1960s through the 2020s. A thick bright red line labeled "2026" runs far below all other years, reaching only about $3–4 per person by mid-June. Year-end labels on the right show FY2024 in teal at the top (around $23 per capita), FY2025 in dark red (around $17), and "1987" in green (around $15). A red dot marks the FY2027 President\'s Budget Request at roughly $11 per capita, with "1973" in gold labeled as the closest historical year-end value. "1969" in brown at the very bottom (around $5) marks the historical year most closely matching FY2026's current pace.

This was a fun challenge to participate in. It is disappointing, however, that the evaluation dataset, built with the expertise of over 40,000 academics, hasn't been made available to participants, let alone released openly. Once it is, we might expect some long-overdue progress in novelty research.

Sarah Otner@sarahotner.bsky.social · 2mo ago

The #Metascience Novelty Indicators Challenge has a winner! Congrats to LENS and to all of the innovators who joined the competition: the field is better because of you all. www.science.org/content/arti... & www.linkedin.com/posts/saraho...

This is a great opportunity to work with a wonderful international team on topics related with Science and Technology Indicators! #scientometrics #bibliometrics

Multi-Observatory of Science, Technology and Innovation Dynamics@multiobs.bsky.social · 3mo ago

The IG-UNICAMP announces a call for eight post-doctoral positions funded by FAPESP in the context of the project MultiObs (multiobs.org) led by researcher Rodrigo Costas (CWTS - Leiden University). Access the link for information and application: www.multiobs.org/opportunitie...