te kootahekore ranapiri

@ired0mi.bsky.social

essa may ranapiri / they/ia / Ngaati Wehi Wehi / Ngaati Puukeko / Ngaati Rangiwewehi / Torere / Clan Gunn / kootuku maa / author of ransack & ECHIDNA

Like these two statements are so contradictory that I think the first one is misleading. My point is if we want officials to read submissions - & we should - we need to be very clear that AI analysis is not and cannot be a proxy for that. At least in terms of dignifying submitters with attention.

What people told the committee

We read every published submission and grouped each one by whether it supports or opposes the bill, and by the reasons people give. The numbers below cover all 12,030 submissions we were able to read.The submissions analysed here are the public submissions on the Legislation (Definitions of Woman and Man) Amendment Bill, as published by the New Zealand Parliament. We downloaded each published submission and extracted its text. This covers all 12,030 submissions we were able to read. A small number were image-only scans that could not be machine-read and are not included.

Each submission was then read by an artificial-intelligence language model, which carried out a sentiment and stance analysis: classifying the submission as opposing, supporting, or taking no clear position on the bill, tagging the reasons it raised, and noting any way the submitter described themselves. The model used was Anthropic’s Claude (Haiku 4.5). Borderline cases were re-checked by a second automated pass, and the results were spot-checked by a person.

it's beyond the pale at this point the way that NZ media and journos promote and amplify the more palatable ACT and NZF propaganda to increase their vote share, while both parties have become absolutely rabid when talking directly to their own supporters - particularly on race and gender

PSA because I see this mistake a lot. If person A quote posts person B, and then person B blocks person A (or vice versa), it will then say "Blocked" for every single other person on Bluesky. It DOES NOT necessarily mean that the person being quoted has blocked you, or that you block them.

‘You give it that brutal treatment yet the work ends up being quite chic and shiny. You’re holding the glam but also the gory.’ Terrific conversation between Amber Esau and Coco Solid about Amber’s poetry collection Hungus: great to be a fly on the wall! Nice shoutout to editor Ashleigh Young too.

‘She’s out there vibing’: Amber Esau and Coco Solid in conversation

'We’re just Venn Diagramming our ways to where the parts of our wakas overlap.'

thespinoff.co.nz

Just once, for a treat, I'd like someone to say "government spending is good actually. It has social *and* economic benefits and we should do more of it." #nzpol

Ganesh Rajaram Ahirao@ganeshahirao.bsky.social · 2mo ago

#nzpol Sigh😢💔 Here we go again - monotonous regularity every election period - claims & counter-claims of spending gaps of $bns on 'promises'. *All* parties perpetuating the same insidious narrative ... "we can't 'afford' to feed or house our people" ... but our 'books' are our priority ... 😠😡

Legit the NZ press gallery constantly whining about this last election gave cover to this government to very likely disenfranchise tens of thousands of voters (via making it harder to register late). But I'm sure being able to make a call on the night (you still won't be able to) is more important.

Post nicht verfügbar.