@jcreed.bsky.social

The Bove allegations should be treated as something akin to Watergate, or Iran Contra. The administration was attempting to do something they *knew* was illegal (anticipating the courts saying as much), and then trying to COVER IT UP. Only here instead of it being run out of the WH or NSC, it’s DOJ

A world of totally made-up, self-referential academic articles, of horror at the limits of our language; of representation; the symbolic seeking a Pyrrhic victory over the Real, of collapsing sense of trust through viral video technology - yes, that’s right, I’m talking about Sigbovik

@boarders.bsky.social · last yr.

A world of totally made-up, self-referential academic articles, of horror at the limits of our language; of representation; the symbolic seeking a Pyrrhic victory over the Real, of collapsing sense of trust through viral video technology - yes, that’s right, I’m talking about House of Leaves

It is completely unlawful for ICE to turn away members of Congress like this. The law could not be more clear; no member of Congress may be denied access to a facility where ICE is detaining someone, and they cannot be required to schedule in advance. Surprise inspections must be surprise.

Jonathan Cohn @jonathancohn.bsky.social · last yr.

If ICE were acting entirely within the law and maintaining good conditions in all its facilities, they would not be turning Congresspeople away. But they clearly aren't. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/08/n...

We must expect and demand that the executive branch follow the law. We must expect and demand that the executive branch comply with court orders. To expect and demand anything less is a form of obeying in advance. Defeatism is a form of surrender.

Acting like they wont equally just ignore an arcane statute as opposed to a SCOTUS order is willfully ignorant.A statute is actually just a piece of paper, and as such cannot force anything at all to happen, let alone force powerful people to do something they dont want to doVery cool, what happens when the administration says "nah?"
Y'all don't get it. Until there's actual consequences for these people NOTHING will happen. NO laws will help us unless they're backed with force of some kind.The Judciary has no enforcement arm, the DOD, DOJ, and Federal Marshall service works for and takes orders from The Executive. The Court can't force The Executive to do anything at all. It's time we start using the correct language.

Is Kilmar Abrego Garcia alive? Because the amount of resistance to addressing his being trafficked gives the distinct impression that either he is dead or what they have done to him is so unspeakable that they cannot afford for him to be freed, seen, or spoken with.

Never again is now, friends. Don't look away. We have a moral obligation to EVERY SINGLE HUMAN BEING being detained, deported, and sent to actual concentration camps on our watch. Who were you when your government perpetuated atrocities? If you're in the US, it's in the wide-open now.

Prem Thakker ツ@premthakker.bsky.social · last yr.

The Trump admin has just detained Mohsen Mahdawi, who: –has green card –was Columbia Buddhist club president –saw his best friend shot & killed by Israeli soldier –said "we are against antisemitism because antisemitism is a form of injustice, and injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

In addition to violating Mr. Mahdawi’s First Amendment rights, the Rubio
Determination and Mr. Mahdawi’s unlawful detention also violates Mr. Mahdawi’s statutory rights
and due process rights.
PARTIES
8. Petitioner Mohsen Mahdawi is a Palestinian who was born and raised in a refugee
camp in the West Bank. He is a lawful permanent resident of the United States and has been for
the last ten years. He is a recent student of Columbia University, with an expected graduation date
of May 2025. He has been admitted to a Master’s program at Columbia University’s School of
International and Public Affairs (“SIPA”), to begin in the fall of 2025.

I had been doubtful that we were going to have a "this is the crisis moment" with Trump, as opposed to "everything about this is a destructive catastrophe." But the Abrego Garcia case is the crisis moment. 1/

NEW: The Trump administration has now filed its status report on Kilmar Abrego Garcia. It says that he is alive and being held in CECOT pursuant to the “domestic authority of El Salvador”

BildBild

Just a reminder that Judge Xinis's original order requiring the government to bring Abrego Garcia back to the United States was in effect for more than 72 hours before it was administratively stayed by Chief Justice Roberts on Monday. What did the Justice Department ... do ... during that time?

Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social · last yr.

BREAKING: DOJ files a response, nearly 50 minutes past the deadline, saying they are "unable to provide" any of the information Judge Xinis ordered. "Defendants are not in a position where they 'can' share any information requested by the Court. That is the reality."

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
(Greenbelt Division)
KILMAR ARMANDO ABREGO
GARCIA et al.,
Civil No.: 8:25-cv-00951-PX
Plaintiffs,
DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO AMENDED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER
v.
KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.,
Defendants.
RESPONSE TO AMENDED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER
Defendants are unable to provide the information requested by the Court on
the impracticable deadline set by the Court hours after the Supreme Court issued its
order. The Supreme Court's order directs the Court to "clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign
affairs." Abrego Garcia v. Noem, 25A949, 604 U. S.
(2025), Op. at 2. The Court
has not yet clarified what it means to "facilitate" or "effectuate" the return as it relates
to this case, as Plaintiff is in the custody of a foreign sovereign. Defendants request-and require the opportunity to brief that issue prior to being subject to any
compliance deadlines. Needless to say, Defendants were under no obligation to take action under the court's order while it was administratively stayed by the Chief
Justice of the United States. In light of the insufficient amount of time afforded to
review the Supreme Court's Order following the dissolution of the administrative stay

The fact that #SCOTUS hasn't yet ruled in Abrego Garcia isn't proof of *how* the justices are going to rule. But the longer it takes, the more it suggests that there isn't a majority of the Court who views this dispute with the same *urgency* that so many of us do. And that's a problem unto itself.

The thing that is currently fueling my creativity is Affinity Photo and the fact I don't have to pay a monthly fee to use it