John Wadham

@john-wadham.bsky.social

Human rights lawyer

For the first time ever in our country's history, a barrister is facing contempt proceedings over the content of their closing speech. It is seriously concerning and entirely disproportionate. Rajiv Menon KC is facing up to two years in prison for the way he defended his client.

Photo of Rajiv Menon KC which says: Prosecution of Palestine Action lawyer, Rajiv Menon KC, IS a serious threat to fair trial rights and the right to protest

A barrister represents his clients in court. Clients who are political dissidents. He now faces criminal prosecution for doing so. Not Turkey. Not Egypt. Not Russia. England. Astonishing, deeply disturbing, and part of a long slide towards authoritarianism. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...

Palestine Action barrister’s prosecution criticised as ‘chilling’

CBA chair says contempt charge over closing speech by Rajiv Menon KC has left lawyers fearful of doing their job

theguardian.com

This is distinctly dangerous. Labour is officially stating that human rights are dependant upon which group you belong to, and I am not ignoring how they already do that for trans individuals. This absolutely undermines the very principle of human rights. That is one dangerous precedent to set. 4/

Restoring public confidence in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) Article 8 by legislating to make it fit for modern migration challenges and aligning application in the UK with the European Court in Strasbourg, after a period when UK courts had expanded domestic interpretation of ECHR Article 8.

The ECHR acts as a vital safety net and chipping away at the protection it offers jeopardises the legal framework that protects us all. Any potential incoming Prime Minister needs to think carefully about whether this is the foundation that they want to build on in Government.

Article 8 (the right to a family life) is something that we all deserve – but also a right that is widely misunderstood. Restricting a judge's ability to consider the needs of a child won’t protect vulnerable children and will weaken human rights frameworks that protect us all.

The proposed Immigration and Asylum Bill will change how our courts apply the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in deportation and immigration cases. This is concerning & could open the door to weakening human rights protections in the years to come. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...

Most asylum seekers rejected under tightened laws will remain in UK

Critics call proposed limits on asylum claims a ‘quick fix that will create long-term chaos’

theguardian.com

Both the government and the Court of Appeal now treat protesters as terrorists and terrorists as protesters. It's hard to accept that a "Labour" government is imposing rightwing authoritarianism on the UK, but please read this column to see what's happening.+🧵 www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

The Belfast riots, Palestine Action protests. What is terrorism now – and why the hypocrisy? | George Monbiot

The right is obsessed with ‘two-tier policing’. This is indeed a two-tier government – but the real victims are progressives, says Guardian columnist George Monbiot

theguardian.com

Love the Q's but disappointed their only inclusion of trans men is "cis women will be confronted by the presence of trans men in their spaces." 1. It isn't true. Trans men are being barred from both spaces. 2. Trans men are ALSO at risk of violence/SA when ppl realise we're trans (links in comments)

Quakers in Britain@quaker.org.uk · 2mo ago

Quakers in Britain has released the following statement on the EHRC's draft code of practice around the UK Supreme Court's ruling on the meaning of sex in the Equality Act . 👇🕯️❤️ https://www.quaker.org.uk/news-and-events/news/quaker-response-to-draft-guidance-around-definition-of-sex

If Muslims or members of the Asian and Black community had set fire to white people’s homes with children running for their lives, do you think we would be discussing legitimate concerns or focussing on who radicalised them and ideological and contributing cultural factors?

The Public Sector Equality Duty is a vital part of the Equality Act. It compels public bodies to respect our rights and enables us to seek justice when they get things wrong. Those calling to scrap it are not being honest with the public about what they stand to lose. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

Kemi Badenoch calls for scrapping of legal equality duty

The Conservative leader says the rules have led to public bodies becoming "institutionally incompetent".

bbc.co.uk

I'm sorry, but this level of stupidity is off the charts. Badenoch could have brought the socio-economic inequalities duty in the Act into force *when she was literally the equalities minister*. How do people like this get dressed in the morning? How do they remember to drink coffee, not bleach?

Steve Peers@stevepeers.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Badenoch is not only confused, but profoundly ignorant. The Equality Act *does* have provisions on class - section 1 of the Act! www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/1... However govts - including the govt she was literally the *equalities minister* in!!! - have not applied this provision in England.

Badenoch: "As it happens, the Equality Act does not protect class, so you would not be able to use it to for white working-class boys" Interviewer: "Labour [the govt] want to extend it so that it does cover class: Badenoch: "This is just going to complicate things further"

“In effort to fend off Reform” As a reason for public policy, this has to be the absolute worst. How much damage will politicians do to compete with Farage? Brexit, immigration, scrapping NetZero..the ECHR..the Equality Act… Stupid reasons to do stupid things. www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

Badenoch to vow to scrap public sector equality duty in effort to fend off Reform

In speech on Tuesday, Tory leader will claim obligation to consider equality being used to advance ‘divisive agendas’

theguardian.com

Kemi Badenoch on R4 is discussing the public sector equality duty almost entirely on the basis of race. But that’s just one of the elements it covers - also gender, disability, age etc etc. These seem to be getting forgotten.

If white working class boys are discriminated against and being white is any material part of the reason for it, the Equality Act will be engaged.