Splatsune Blue Edition

@neurario.com

I make things no one will see. I am cringe, but I am free. 12/1991 | Pan | Genderfluid AMAB | Australia #ActuallyAutistic I will repost adult art I enjoy. Use your filters people. Fediverse alt: @fedi.neurario.com Chip in: https://coindrop.to/splatsune

I guess then, a "reasonable consumer" would decide against owning a Playstation (any modern one). It is "not plausible" to suggest anyone buy a digital game from a company that holds their customer base in such contempt. Emulation then is the only "reasonable" reaction. #Gaming #SonySucks

VGC@videogameschronicle.com · 3d ago

Sony says "reasonable consumers" know they don’t own the digital PlayStation games they buy. It argues that it's "not plausible" to suggest that when they buy a digital game they actually believe they're "obtaining ownership" of it. www.videogameschronicle.com/news/sony-sa...

Some guy I was carpooling today lamented that he couldn’t say the word ‘faggot’ anymore… because the guy he didn’t like was gay and it ‘wouldn’t hurt as much for an insult.’ Ugh.

SMBC panel: “WHAT INSIDE YOU DIED AND WHY DIDN'T IT TAKE THE REST OF YOU WITH IT?”

Woke up to this news and I’m beyond disgusted. It’s a US *constitutional right* now to create and own ‘CSAM,’ as long as it was made with AI?? AI gen images are built from real images, of real children. This directly re-exploits every single CSAM survivor. (More in 🧵) #abolition #trafficking

A federal judge has ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual's right to privately possess child sexual abuse content created using Al if it does not depict a real person and remains in the home.
On Tuesday, Judge John Z. Lee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th District ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual's right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using artificial intelligence if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home. In his ruling, Judge Lee urged the Supreme Court to reconsider the issue of virtual abuse material of children in the age of Al, suggesting that technological advances complicate existing legal precedent.
The case Lee ruled on came about in 2024 when the Department of Justice brought charges against Steven Anderegg, alleging that he used Al to create thousands of explicit images of children. He was accused of breaking federal obscenity laws by producing, distributing and possessing obscene visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Anderegg sought to have the possession and production charges dismissed under the First Amendment. Last year, a judge in the Western District of Wisconsin agreed to dismiss the possession charge, prompting the federal prosecutors to appeal.
Lee, in his ruling upholding the lower court's decision, cited the precedent set by Supreme Court rulings from 1969 and 2002. One held that individuals have a right to possess obscenity in the privacy of their home. The other found that "virtual" child sexual abuse material, not depicting a real person is not child pornography.

Hey guys! Due to the trend of "what's your undertale soul color" reels I've seen recently, I decided to make something hopefully more accurate and fun than the other tests out there. I wanted it to be very Undertale themed and to have a bunch of Easter eggs. Try it at undertale.jadenthejaded.uk!

Stock image of the results from the test mentioned in the post. All values are at 50%.