patchamgreenguy.bsky.social

@patchamgreenguy.bsky.social

Campaigning for the Greens in Patcham and Hollingbury.

My memory of Bravo Two Zero is hazy but did they not land in Iraq, immediately get spotted, retreat, lose all their gear, get spotted again and broken up, and then get captured? I feel like human rights law may not have been the key problem, there.

The Telegraph
@Telegraph •3h
Former SAS soldier @The_Real_McNab says fears of prosecution under human rights law are driving fighters away from the special forces and making fewer willing to join.
X
Read his full take below
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/09/O...
Telegraph

I’ve said for years now that the Gaza genocide was a useful catalyst and pretext for govts in the Sainted West to quell dissent at home and rewrite the laws of war abroad. It’s also coincided with re-feudalisation, and that's why the serfs are increasingly being castigated for acts of lèse-majesté

'Terrorist connection' over Trump Turnberry vandalism charges

Seven people accused of causing damage at Trump's resort could receive longer sentences if convicted.

bbc.co.uk

Nice government you got here. But you hear nasty things, stuff just goes on fire all of a sudden. You know, one carelessly dropped match and (hands together, exploding outward fingers) woof

Connor Stringer C @connorstringer
X.com
***EXCLUSIVE***
The United States may reconsider its position on Britain's claim to the Falkland Islands if it does not increase its defence spending,
@Telegraph can reveal.
The extraordinary proposal is among a series of creative measures drawn up by senior
Pentagon officials to incentivise Nato allies that fall short of the alliance's 5pc spending pledge.
Britain will receive "special attention" in Washington's review of whether allies have credible plans to hit the target, a senior US official told The Telegraph.
Officials believe that while Britain has the potential to be a leading defence partner, the Defence Investment Plan is not enough of a
"step in the right direction"
The measure is part of a wider effort by Donald Trump's administration to push Nato into what

Trans people, since forever, have said that bigotry and discrimination wouldn’t just stop with them. That GCs don’t just hate trans people: we were their wedge issue to normalise it wider. But, oh no, we were told we were just being hyperbolic and paranoid. Guess what, cis people, it’s here.

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️@geekonaleash.co.uk · 6d ago

Well, this was inevitable. Forstater is now using her own case to argue that racism should/is protected as a philosophical belief 🤮

"Even comments which are “serious, severely hurtful and 
prejudicial”are covered by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human rights (freedom of expression) which doesn't mean absolute freedom of expression in a situations, but employers should treat beliefs equally.

As the judge said in my case even beliefs that are profoundly distressing and offensive to many others are beliefs that must be tolerated in a pluralist society."

It's funny that one of the most inefficient technologies of all time (LLMs) is being used to help people write papers in software engineering that, as Jeff wrote, "has a very explicit goal of improving the way we develop software--better, cheaper, or faster"

Linkedin post by  Jeff Offutt (Professor and Chair at University at Albany)

Solve problems, don't count beans.

My research community is scared about a recent extreme increase in paper submissions to conferences. Many of them are low quality with little or no research contribution. And the most alarming trend is the number of paper submitted by the same author ... 10, 20, 50!

If we allow our names to be put on a paper, we should have read it and made a MEANINGFUL research contribution to the research. And being the money-bringer is not a research contribution. Even at my best, I couldn’t make a real contribution to more than 6 papers. Anyone who sends 15 or 20 or 40 papers to the same conference isn’t doing research. At best it’s fraud. 

What is our goal as a researcher? Are we truly only playing a numbers game, where more bullets on our CVs is a measure of our worth? How about refocusing away from numbers, and try to make contributions. New knowledge, better solutions to actual problems, increased understanding.

Most of my research is in software engineering, which has a very explicit goal of improving the way we develop software--better, cheaper, or faster. We write science fiction (it could work in the future), not fantasy (assumes magic or different fundamental laws of the universe). If the contributions in a paper have no chance to eventually help real software engineers, then why publish? Why do the work?

I don't remember seeing this support for far more serious scholars who were targeted for their pro-Palestine views. Instead, this gutter racist is showered with support.

what ppl forget about LLMs is that if you start every prompt with “i am an academic so a very special and smart person“ then anything that follows has no carbon or water cost, no refugees have to clean the data of violent child abuse imagry, and everyone is fairly compensated for their stolen work

“The Snag” is: you can’t sanction goods from the illegal settlements in the West Bank because they aren’t marked “from illegal settlements in the West Bank”, so this risks being a de facto sanctions regime against Israel itself. To which we might say: that sounds like Israel’s problem to sort out

Bild

Centrists and the media are doing a full court press against the data center backlash, further proof they only exist to enrich billionaire pedophiles and not inform or build a better world. Naked greed and contempt for people and the planet.

I don’t think it could be any more clear what’s happening here, and I don’t think anyone pushing this stuff deserves a second’s worth of intellectual charity. They all know exactly what they’re doing, and why.

Do folks realize that it is not 2020 anymore and that you can't just call people you don't know or understand but seem to disagree with "racist"?
It's just not how adults are supposed to resolve their disagreements.
Cambridge is already an embarrassment. No need to add to it.
Priyamvada Gopal © @PriyamvadaGopal • 11h
It is kind of charming that all the racists are outing themselves. By racists here I mean people who appear to thing 'race science' and 'race realism' are actual disciplines because human beings are fundamentally biologically different from each other. x.com/prossertj/stat...
2
33
ıll 789

I think if an academic is only now in 2026 signing a letter about free speech then it's reasonable to ask whether they signed any in support of pro Palestine academics who were fired

i have never paid any attention to the arday allegations/countercaims/etc because it was obvious on day 2 that the story wasn't about what it was alleged to be about, and everyone involved was pretending not to see that.

Even if we charitably assume the Guardian keeps catching strays intended for their more overtly horrible colleagues, I would say the priority here is to point fingers at the guilty men and shout j’accuse, rather than curling into a ball and whining because the public are mean to you on BlueSky.

theguardian.com

Note here how the terfs, the newspaper columnists, rabid Trumpers and the hyper-online race science Nazis are all on the same page, repeating exactly the same drivel. Their actual numbers are few, by the way. Even together, they are badly outnumbered by the rest of us.

Bild