@remylevin.bsky.social & @danielavidart.bsky.social combine American panel and survey data to show that labour markets that prime-aged men experienced while growing up shaped their willingness to work decades later. cepr.org/voxeu/column... #EconSky
Remy Levin
@remylevin.bsky.social
Assistant Professor of Economics @UConn. https://sites.google.com/view/remy-levin
The 50-year decline in US male labor force participation is partly driven by men’s beliefs about the returns to work, shaped by lifetime experiences of male labor markets, from @remylevin.bsky.social and Daniela Vidart www.nber.org/papers/w35327
Martin Peterson's creative response to being banned from teaching Plato (shared with his permission).
Enjoy this huskie + basketball french toile wallpaper) from a great visit @uconn.bsky.social including pizza with @davidesimon.bsky.social @danielavidart.bsky.social @remylevin.bsky.social and a visit to the Dairy Bar with @deliafurtado.bsky.social, bonus was seeing @nataliemillar.bsky.social
Nothing like waking up to find out your colleagues have a WP out that makes you rethink the interpretation of one of your papers! We show that weaker work norms increase the likelihood of going on DI when times are tough, but worth thinking about where those norms come from:
delia-furtado.uconn.edu
🦶New version of our WP “Nobody Wants to Work Anymore”🦶w/ @danielavidart.bsky.social Headline: a major contributor to the 50-year decline in U.S. male labor force participation is changes in men's beliefs about returns to work, shaped by lifetime experiences of aggregate male labor markets.
So once they identified today's Nobel prize recipients, they couldn't quite track them down.
Whatever you're doing, STOP RIGHT THIS SECOND and watch a sperm whale gulp down a squid, I promise you will not regret it
I get that the news cycle is packed right now, but I just heard from a colleague at the Smithsonian that this is fully a GIANT SQUID BEING EATEN BY A SPERM WHALE and it’s possibly the first ever confirmed video according to a friend at NOAA 10 YEAR OLD ME IS LOSING HER MIND (a thread 🧵)
Excellent piece by Ezra Klein: if Dems really believe that Trump is creating an authoritarian government they should not continue to fund it. The shutdown is their only leverage right now to draw attention to what is happening and maybe force change. www.nytimes.com/2025/09/07/o...
Opinion | Stop Acting Like This Is Normal
nytimes.com
Many studies claim a steady decline of cognitive ability with age, starting from as earlier as one’s twenties. But this research is flawed, argues Aaron Dymarskiy—more accurate research finds it does not peak until at least age 60: buff.ly/SiVx5ve
The biggest analytical weakness of Americans in trying to understand the current moment is that their powers of analogy begin and end with US history. The idea that something qualitatively different might be arising simply doesn’t occur to them.
We usually rely on GDP, trade, or wages to study the past. This amazing paper flips the script. It analyzes 630,000 paintings (1400-2000) to extract emotions and shows how art tracks living standards, wars, inequality, and even climate shocks. (How is this economics? Everything is economics!)
About this Florida vaccine story: When they were little - 1 yr and 3 1/2 - my two older boys, who’d had all their shots, got whooping cough. We asked their pediatrician what would’ve happened if they hadn’t been vaccinated. “Oh, they’d have died.”
I’ve got a new working paper with @danielavidart.bsky.social, hot off the press. We develop a new method for measuring the risk preferences of agents in the past, and apply it to the U.S. from 1890-1920. Check it out! Feedback is welcome. www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/chcof...
Essay which clearly outlines the scientific and ethical problems with selecting embryos for polygenic traits. Scientists associating themselves with embryo selection companies, and those who’ve previously defended sociogenomics but are staying silent on these companies, come in for criticism here
New blog post: The New Eugenics Companies (Oops, I meant to say generational health and embryo selection)
I think this is naive. Human curiosity isn’t going away, but science requires real resources. The US is the world’s largest economy, and US scientific output dwarfs that of any other country. A major contraction in US science means a major contraction in global science.
"If the U.S. is no longer the world’s technoscientific superpower, it will almost certainly suffer for the change. America’s technology sector might lose its creativity. But science itself, in the global sense, will be fine. The deep human curiosities that drive it do not belong to any nation-state"
Statement from the largest economics association about the BLS firing As context: AEA approximately never makes such public statements This is a big deal
So when are we starting to monitor US GDP with nightlights?
Okay, *now you can start to worry about data being manipulated.
Okay, *now you can start to worry about data being manipulated.
Corrupt. Dangerous. Deeply deeply damaging.
I suspect we won’t see true AGI until we have quantum computing on lock
Everything that’s happened over the past six months has been a response to an imaginary crisis. There is no immigrant invasion. No trade crisis. No scientific or governance crisis. Just people completely high off their own supply trying to fundamentally reorder society. None of this had to happen.
I love this imagery: seeing Buddha meditating under a tree and about to achieve enlightenment Mara's army attacks. But such is the power of peaceful calm around Gautama that as arrows and spears approach they transform into flowers, and fall gently to the ground around Buddha. I reflect on it often.
This is very bad Once they start screwing with the data, that’s the whole ballgame
Trump officials delayed farm trade report over deficit forecast
Administration officials blocked publication of written analysis that normally accompanies the report because they disliked what it said about the deficit.
politico.com
We should redefine the Singularity as the inevitable moment when one banana will in fact cost $10, Michael.