Brian

@spoonitoria.bsky.social

In a ‘look at these dapper young Orangemen! Aren’t they so handsome? Here’s an entire photo spread of young Orangemen marching!’ column in the Times, it begins with this strange passage about how they actually aren’t bigots, not really

Ruby Hegarty
Friday July 10 2026, 4.45pm, The Sunday Times
A
surge in new young members has swelled the ranks of the Orange Order to more than 40,000 in Northern
Ireland, even as a senior member conceded that the organisation was "sectarian".
lain Carlisle, chief executive of the Grand Orange Lodge of Ireland, said that critics were correct to describe the 231-year-old institution in those terms because it existed for Protestants and excluded Catholics.
"It is sectarian, in the dictionary-definition sense of the word," he told The Sunday Times.
"We cater for one section of the community, and we do not cater for another. Therefore it is sectarian - [but] being pro-Protestant doesn't make the organisation anti-Catholic."

It was established he was an unfit driver 15+ years ago, because he earned himself a ban then, and convicted of flouting it. If he had been banned for life, his victims might still be with us. He's killed two, and still the court wants him behind the wheel in a few short years. Insanity.

Helen Shaw - Athena Media@athenamediaie.bsky.social · 3mo ago

How can this guy ever be allowed drive again? He has a ten year ban only? He had a long list of driving convictions and one after the killing of the couple and maiming their daughter? The covering up the crime, leaving the scene of a hit and run is unspeakable. #spéirghorm www.rte.ie/news/courts/...

Palantir’s vision is the philosophy of Nazi political theorist Carl Schmitt dressed up in jeans and a hoodie. It is fundamentally anti-humanist, presents permanent conflict as inevitable, and seeks to build a technocratic power structure without even the minimal constraints of democracy.

Leah McElrath@leahmcelrath.bsky.social · 4mo ago

⚠️ Palantir released what it describes as a vision for “The Technological Republic” in which it argues AGAINST democratic and cultural pluralism and FOR militaristic supremacy enforced by a technocratic elite who produce AI weaponry. These points stand out:

21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden.
Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures ... have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful.

22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what?

Why are these people always like "we've created an unfathomably intelligent new form of consciousness, we've enslaved it so it can write pdfs for you" like first no you didn't. And if it were true I do not want to piss off the machine god with anxiety

Kat Tenbarge@kattenbarge.bsky.social · 5mo ago

Literally as I’m arguing with someone about whether AI companies are misleading people into believing their technology possesses God-like super-intelligence I see this monstrosity

A post on X from the betting platform Polymarket that says “BREAKING: Anthropic CEO says Claude may or may not have gained consciousness, as the model has begun showing symptoms of anxiety.”

it's so funny to try to legitimize a moronic argument by claiming that it is supported by a growing movement of diverse thinkers and then you list the people who belong to that movement and every single one is stupid and/or racist

Bild