Waking up to a very bright and beautiful bluesky! Big Optimism vibes coming from the US 🤩 Congratualtions and thank you!!
I don’t know the yes-or-no, but how all of this pans out, if AI is a software or infrastructure or other business and if there is anything close to the multi trillion dollar market it demands and who is going to pay that … is SO massively missed in the polarisation around a single vocal journalist
But that’s… not the key question. “Is this internecine squabble about something Ed said once?” isn’t the question. The question is “is any of this sustainable, why have we folded the entire economy into this gambit, and is this how we should be spending our money?” Ed is right that the answer is no.
No matter where you shop, you're getting screwed by Amazon. Amazon has found a way to make everything you buy - at Target, at a mom-and-pop shop, even direct from the manufacturer - more expensive. And they're not the only one: Expedia's done the same thing, but for hotel rooms.
Mildly infuriating state of vendor wrappers and harnesses - how can this not run the most basic operations? They need to be better in their domain than the model provider
This is right. The issue is that LLMs are at best a $50 billion/year revenue type business and they've invested in it like it's going to be $500 billion/year in revenue or more. The mismatch is potentially trillions in capex overspend which is enough to cause a deep recession when the bubble pops.
I think it's closer to the truth that LLMs *can* save time on *some tasks* which can be valuable *if* you monitor them and check their output. But that doesn't get you a trillion dollars so they have to squint into the middle distance and say stupid sci fi bullshit instead
Took me 10 minutes to understand something using pen and paper when I could have spent an hour with AI to get it into my head 🎉
We need to rephrase the whole discussion in terms of hazardous products, instead of "minds". And then we need to make sure that there's liability. A model hacks someone? Put a C-suite guy in jail. A model produces sexual harassment material? Put a C-suite guy in jail. Watch how fast things get safe
New just now in The Atlantic: David Robinson resigned this week. He was among the longest-tenured employees at OpenAI—and oversaw safety reports on 12 frontier launches. He is very worried: “The time for trial and error is over.” You can read his essay here: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
This is a *really* good summary of the problem of the perceived authority of AI. The next-level problem is shills like RFK Jr who don't understand why this is a problem.
Eugenics 🤝 ai www.nytimes.com/2026/09/29/h...
If an individual did this, we'd treat it as a crime. We should treat this as a crime too, and hold OpenAI liable for what its models, under its supervision, did. www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09...
OpenAI agent hacked Medicare portal, PM says
Anthony Albanese says he has spoken to the Open AI chief executive to express his concern about the incident and the length of time it took the tech company to inform the government of the breach.
abc.net.au
I may still have more hours in this than any other video game - my parents were the “no violent video games” type and so I had no consoles or shooters but between this and Master of Orion 2 I played the absolute shit out of 4x
What's your "origin" video game? Most gamers have a lot of favorite games, sure, but there's always one that basically 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 you. I'm talking about the game that flipped that little switch in your brain and made into a life-long gamer. So, which game is 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨?
Man who supported Brexit then fucked off to Monaco to avoid contributing a penny of his £15 billion fortune to public services makes the mistake of thinking anyone gives a shit what he thinks.
It's very clear that companies are generating racist and sexist controversy as a brand strategy, e.g., Sydney Sweeney, Converse.
@aoc.bsky.social just put out a great statement on AI. Refreshing to see a major politician on the left nail this. "Silicon Valley billionaires want us to believe that Al robots will destroy humanity. But the biggest threat to humanity are the tech oligarchs themselves." 🎯
This is such a great thread because it tells you instantly how to answer the supposedly intractable regulation problem: liability, potentially joint liability, for the person who set up the AI system.
If I was just a little more condescending, I'd start a web series where I sit down with someone who thinks LLMs are inherently harmful, help them install one on their laptop, and then we sit and wait for it to do something harmful on it's own. 30 minutes of uncomfortable silence. "Any moment now..."
Fucking bullshit that this guy is not only doing the press rounds but is the guy politicians on the "left" are taking their cues from.
The real existential risk from AI is LLMs will soon write and release Monty Pythons “Funniest Joke in the World” archive.org/details/mont...
Monty Python - Funniest Joke in the World
'Funniest Joke in the World' sketch from Monty Python. Rights belongs to the BBC.
archive.org
Evidence keeps accumulating that LLMs are a powerfully useful technology for people who already know what they're talking about, and a dangerous outsourcing of cognitive function for people who don't. This can occur within a single individual, who knows a lot about some things and not about others.
Students who get good grades on homework tend to get good grades on tests. But a recent study out of China shows a divergence. The old correlation holds for students who didn't use AI on homework, but it's the opposite for those who did. Using AI = best homework grades, worst test grades
Reading Code Considered Helpful. The mainstream view among software engineers is basically: - We read some of the code, that's important. - Agents are cool, they aren't everything. - Needs vary. The weird pressures that attack this view are discussed for 6K words. raymyers.org/post/reading...
Reading Code Considered Helpful
More is not better. Faster is not better. Better is better.
raymyers.org
I didn’t discuss Jason Arday on my show for this exact reason. If he had been white and behaved unprofessionally it would have been handled internally by his employers. As it is, it became clear that certain commentators wouldn’t be satisfied until he was dead www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Jason Arday: Former Cambridge university professor found dead
Jason Arday was found "unresponsive" at an address in Battersea, south London, on Friday afternoon, officials said.
bbc.co.uk
Just discovered and really enjoy reading substack.com/@aisnakeoil/... as well as the latest “What will be left for us to work on?” substack.com/@aisnakeoil/...
Up the Stack: How AI’s Escape From the Commodity Trap Risks Enterprise Lock-in
Critics and boosters are both looking in the wrong place
substack.com
What in the chicken fried fuck did I just read They’re doing turd eugenics now?
Oh my god the dietician who is telling everyone in the White House to only eat steak and sauerkraut doesn't wipe his ass.
Enjoyed this. As a layperson it was really educational on technical mechanisms of economic fallout, things I wouldn’t think about if not for this intersection. I feel it nicely says “these bits are wrong” without extrapolating to “your diagnosis is off - AI funding is secure - and EZ is an idiot”
NEW @crisesnotes.bsky.social PIECE: In this piece I critique a recent piece from @edzitron.com comparing the AI(LLM) boom to the "Subprime" Mortgage Crisis (and implicitly the GFC of 2007-2009). The ? is:"How big of a macrofinancial threat is the AI(LLM) Boom?" www.crisesnotes.com/sigh-no-ed-z...
You use AI to write more code. I use it to make my code more correct. We are not the same.
It's safe to assume that all major LLMs are scraping Bluesky data to train future models. As an open protocol, Bluesky is one of the few sources of fresh human-generated content that anybody can gobble up. So all this is probably going in the models. There are submarines in the Great Lakes.