Emma

@this-is-emma.bsky.social

Archaeologist, historian, archival and collections researcher. Specializing in 19th American medicine and permafrost thaw in Alaska.

#histmed folks I have a question: what type of medical tradition (ie heroic, biomedical, etc) is medicine in America from 1850-1900? The strongest consensus I can find is “scientific medicine” to reflect the new connection to biology and experimentation but that feels very… Western.

We’re officially winding down/putting a lot of our Alaska work on ice while we focus on Minnesota projects (due to lack of funding/collaboration availability) and I’m suddenly having to remember how to CRM style work in the lower 48

A new paper shows that less than 2 months of exposure to Twitter’s algorithmic feed significantly shifts people’s political views to the right. Moving from chronological feed to the algorithmic feed also increases engagement. This is one of the most concerning papers I’ve read in awhile.

The political effects of X's feed algorithm
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2
Received: 16 December 2024
Accepted: 4 January 2026
Published online: 18 February 2026
Open access
• Check for updates
Germain Gauthier,5, Roland Hodler?5, Philine Widmer35 & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya3,4,5 m
Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects'. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk's platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects.
Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users' feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X's algorithm has persistent effects on users' current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.

Me: this masculinity chapter is going to be so hard to write, just as difficult as the poverty chapter Also me: 2500 words in after 3 days of writing and we haven’t even hit the Civil War yet.

I just found out about this from @resourcefulsqrl.bsky.social and I cannot properly convey my excitement because one of the map sets I need for my book are georeferenced and ready to go and that makes it so much easier as a postdoc who doesn’t have protected research time to make figures.

Adam Cox@mradamcox.bsky.social · 11mo ago

If you are in the New Orleans area, come to one of our upcoming Georeference-a-thons at Second Line Brewing! Tuesday evenings, the 16th and 23rd. RSVP form here: tiny.cc/georef-2025. We'll be focusing on 1895 Duncan Plaza area and hearing from archaeologists who did work there over the summer.

Flyer for two community georeferencing events: Sept 16th & 23rd, at Second Line Brewing in New Orleans, LA.

Anyone around today or tomorrow who is willing to answer a few questions about their academic book contract? I just got a draft of mine and I don’t have many benchmarks for if it’s okay or not tbh.

This is just National Institutes of Health grant funding. Similar refusal to spend funds appropriated by Congress has been happening all across the government— and Republicans in Congress, every one of them doormats for Musk and Trump, have sat around and watched. This via @pamherd.bsky.social

Pam Herd@pamherd.bsky.social · last yr.

Trump has cut the NIH budget by more than half in defiance of Congressionally mandated appropriations for the agency. No comparison historically, not even the Great Recession. This is clearly not legal and Congress needs to address it.

Graph from the Washington Post showing declines in spending at NIH. New grants cut from 1 billion to around 400 million. Overall grants down from 4.5 billion to 2.4 billion.