J. Arendt

@uwwoman.bsky.social

RVA librarian working at a local university and riding my bike there; opinions expressed are my own and not those of my employer or anyone else https://my-year-of.ghost.io/ is the home of my blog / newsletter.

Facing federal science budget cuts, biologist Daniel Blumstein resorted to uploading marmot videos to OnlyFans to raise funds for his marmot research. However, when he uploaded his driver’s license for verification, OnlyFans informed him that his appearance didn’t match the marmots in the videos.

‘OnlyMarms’: Marmots Are on OnlyFans to Raise Money for Research (Gift Article)

A team of scientists uploaded videos of the squirrel-like rodents in the wild on the adult-content site OnlyFans to raise money amid government budget cuts.

nytimes.com

The study was selective about the "human written" comparison texts. AI was easy to detect compared to published stories written by folks like "Joyce Carol Oates, Stephen King, Louis L'Amour, Charlotte Perkins, and Harlan Ellison." (Image from the Github page for the study)

Table of the genres of the source stories. The stories were drawn a little more than 2/3 from literary fiction and only 1/3 from genre fiction.
404 Media@404media.co · 4w ago

NEW: Fiction written by AI is easy to detect because it struggles with complex story structure, according to a new study. Researchers found that AI fiction has tells that go beyond the overuse of em-dashes and other obvious AI tropes and have more to do with the formulaic nature of the text itself.

Because that Brown professor is a game theory expert, I hope there's someone -- maybe even him -- who will model the AI cheating situation as a variation on the prisoner's dilemma.

Jane Rosenzweig@janerosenzweig.bsky.social · 4w ago

this piece by @jeffsharlet.bsky.social about what his students have said about AI, why they're using it, and what they think about it. "Nobody used the term “arms race,” but that’s what they described: enormous pressure to use AI or fall behind those who are." /2

This week, I was reading a compendium for professors of AI-limiting assignment and testing methods. One author's job included, ".. encouraging all stakeholders to use AI." After writing a couple books on how to use AI in classes, even he was following faculty requests to write this opposite book.

Ed Zitron@edzitron.com · 4w ago

Cultist shit. A desperate last gasp operation to try and keep people believing, to bully them into acquiescing, to use social pressure to force a technology that will either continue to increase in cost and eventually will simply run out of cash to continue, truly corrosive to company culture.

I agree with this post about the paired reading. AND. I’ve been thinking about this story since I read it last week. The banner issue gets lost in the AI as cheating narrative. Serrano switched to take-home exams in the wake of a fatal campus shooting he attributed in part to excessive stress. 1/n

Jane Rosenzweig@janerosenzweig.bsky.social · 4w ago

Here are two stories worth reading together. In the first one, a Brown University professor found that most of his students used AI on a take-home exam. This is a story about AI use that fits the framework of academic honesty we had before AI: students just...cheated. But worth reading along with/1

About a year ago someone ridiculed AI refusers for being quaint and naive. I jumped in with the idea that we were in a 1920 moment, before the interstate highway system and the other damage created by molding U.S. cities around cars. Bending the path now will be easier than reshaping later.

Sarah Dougherty@sarahdougherty.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Ahh, so trying to say we should change norms to let AI dominate like we let cars dominate now. Dont think that is a convincing argument for letting those norms change. I would like go back to earlier outrage at traffic violence, as discussed in book by @thewaroncars.bsky.social