Vladimir Volkov 🇺🇦

@vladimirvolkov.bsky.social

Reader in Biochemistry @QMUL. Interested in #biophysics #cryoET #multivalency. I post preprints. he/him volkovlab.com

Almost exactly 6 months ago, RPN was leaked a document presented to STFC staff that said the council had to reduce spending by £162m by 2029-30 That kicked off months of debate on how cuts would be made But only now has it become clear the total cost savings needed over 4 years is in fact £684m 🧵

A fully funded PhD position is now open in my lab at the University of Iceland. We are looking for an ambitious researcher to join us in Reykjavik, Iceland to work on targeted protein degradation. Interested? You are welcome to contact me or check out: 🔗https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/jobs/452601

Composing a decision letter and deciding on reviewer comments to be addressed/overruled is THE single most important task for which we have editors, IMO. If you get a decision from a journal with zero guidance and a laundry list of unreasonable reviewer demands, the journal editor has FAILED.

I'm old enough to remember QED's authors said it's just providing an author with internal feedback, and emphatically isn't trying to mimic human review. Now it's compared to human review or journal selectivity and used to rank (other people's) work. The authors seem to ignore the black box aspect1/3

QED Science@qedscience.bsky.social · last mo.

🎉 Meet The 1%. Out of 57,455 bioRxiv life science preprints, QED Science selected 574 exceptional manuscripts through blind evaluation. The 1%: the-one-percent.qedscience.com Good science deserves to be seen. @biorxivpreprint.bsky.social @openrxiv.bsky.social @richardsever.bsky.social

I know it seems like a heretical idea, but one way to figure out if a preprint is really interesting (to you) is... to read the preprint. Then, in the spirit of sharing, send a note to authors: a simple kudos or a more detailed question. I do this a dozen times a year. It's awesome. Try it.

“Glam journals are awful! We shouldn’t care about journal names or IF.” hey, here’s a new metric that we should all use to judge science @qedscience.bsky.social metrics 😒

Pedro Beltrao@pedrobeltrao.bsky.social · last mo.

@qedscience.bsky.social has come up with a really controversial idea - an AI score for scientific impact. This trained score correlates with the impact factor of published preprints and the binning of papers into discrete quality bins accessed by independent scientists. Backlash in 3, 2, 1... (more)

I am looking to recruit 2 postdoctoral fellows to the lab to work on a recently funded project focused on class switch recombination in B cells. If you are interested in immunology, gene expression, and RNA and protein single molecule imaging, please reach out (schmi706@msu.edu). Please share!

I’ve officially resigned as Associate Editor for Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. It used to be a reputable journal, but became a case study in how forced automation destroys academic integrity. 👇

📢🚨 We're hiring! Join my new computational biophysics team at @BirkbeckUoL to study the biomechanics of the kinetochore-microtubule complex using all-atom and coarse-grained MD. 24-month postdoc, London-based. Apply by 7th July: www.jobs.ac.uk/job/DRV016/p...

Postdoctoral Researcher at Birkbeck, University of London

Discover an exciting academic career path as a Postdoctoral Researcher at jobs.ac.uk. Don't miss out on this job opportunity - apply today!

jobs.ac.uk

1/🧵 Can transcription factor condensate formation be explained without phase separation? Our new preprint introduces SPARK, a simulation tool that reproduces condensate behavior (clustering, fusion, FRAP) from diffusion & binding kinetics alone. Movie: 60 sec FRAP sim www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

The Thermo Fisher situation keeps getting worse. We've now collected 450+ problematic images presented as verification data in TF's antibody catalog. This includes: 🖌️ Dozens more images with duplications or painting 🖨️ Hundreds of blots that all share the same background (behold slideshow below)