Agent Broflake

@abroflake.bsky.social

Friendship over with politics posting, opus is my best friend now

The recent popularity of the move to blame AI firms for ineffective *marketing* is mostly: a) a lot of people now realize they were wrong to spend 3 yrs insisting the tech was useless + b) “I was wrong” is a sentence most humans can’t write. = c) “they explained it badly.”

if you look at that behavior, even if you didn’t partake yourself, and go “yea that is warranted”, “what’s wrong with that”, or whatever else, you’re just as complicit as the folks doing the bullying.

if youre in the group of people where folks are saying things like “keep bullying them it’s working”, “yea run them the fuck out of here no one wants them”, “even your cat thinks you’re a pathetic human”, or similar, it doesn’t matter how right you are about the thing you’re talking about.

10,000 starship launches annually. By 2030. In 3 years there is going to be a market for this? There will be capability? Who is going on these launches? Where are they going? WHY are they going? At what price? Who's paying? Answer: Musk has no idea. He's just saying shit. There is no consequence.

there is so much harm caused by AI right now that is going to proliferate exactly because a large portion of the left in politics cannot actually interact with AI-related topics without devolving into madness. its a real problem!!

I think we need to kill the sentiment that people lose their right to personhood and you know, due process once they do something bad enough

i love bluesky because you can be arguing with someone named like “Big Titty Sleestak Girlfriend” and then you look up their domain name and it turns out they have 12 patents from intel

There's a problem here- the inflection point of the code quality sky rocketing was last November, so anything before then just is too dated to be meaningful. Now the problem is a very different one- complacency from high quality plus a volume far too great to meaningfully review by hand.

By Cory Doctorow (GPG 0xBF3D9110957E5F4C)@doctorow.pluralistic.net · 4w ago

As many skilled programmers can attest, chatbots can produce very useful output - but as even the most ardent AI-assisted coder will admit, chatbot-written code is also full of baffling, obvious errors (and subtle, hard-to-spot ones): pluralistic.net/2025/08/04/b... 7/

This is also AI derangement. If we wish to appeal to authority, I'm going to take a prize-winning mathematician's opinion about mathematics over a blatant non-sequitur at best that tries to restore a narrative by appealing to the author's own ignorance as proof.

By Cory Doctorow (GPG 0xBF3D9110957E5F4C)@doctorow.pluralistic.net · 4w ago

In other words, I lack the discernment to evaluate the output of the chatbot that Tao exchanged theories with. Show me an equally opaque transcript of a "conversation" between a chatbot and a crank with AI psychosis whose math made no sense whatsoever. 5/

on the third day of claudemas my agent sent to me, three smoking guns two honest caveats and a load-bearing critical seam