Charity Majors

@charity.wtf

cofounder/CTO @honeycombio, co-author of Observability Engineering and Database Reliability Engineering. I test in production and so do you. 🐝🏳️‍🌈🦄

Years ago, I predicted columnar storage would remake the landscape of observability. I thought a wave of new columnar-backed tools would displace the creaky old three pillars model with tech that is faster, easier, cheaper, better in every way. Well, I was half right. charity.wtf/p/have-you-h...

Have you heard? Clickhouse is winning the observability wars!

Years ago I predicted that columnar storage would remake observability. What I didn't see coming: vendors would build it, nerf it, and sell a worse version back to you as "Datadog, but cheaper"

charity.wtf

Honeycomb put an LLM into their dashboard and it's actually really helpful. I can ask it a question about prod and it looks up all the data, answers my question, gives me links to the deterministic evidence that proves its theory.

Performance engineering isn't just about changing code in place, it's also about offering customers options that align better with their needs. In the chapter, I discuss how the SWITCH() operator in Honeycomb Calculated Fields came to be, after I noticed customers doing IF(EQUALS(), IF(EQUALS()...

Charity Majors@charity.wtf · 2mo ago

parts 4 and 5 feature a list of guest contributors i'm particularly proud of, from the Clickhouse chapter to a Fin case study, a @lizthegrey.com chapter on performance engineering, a Hansen Ho chapter, a chapter on telemetry pipelines from our friends at Bindplane, etc

I get asked to read and blurb a lot of books. It's always an honor to be asked -- writing a book is a TON of work -- but I almost never do. If I wouldn't chase you down on the street and urge you to read a book, it feels wrong to blurb it. I would chase you down to read this. My blurb is true.

Dr. Cat Hicks

Leading the science of software success

drcathicks.com

Cat Hicks@grimalkina.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Today's book post is going to be short and joyful, because we've been learning a lot of science but it's time to ride into the weekend with some celebration. I'd like to share some of the early reviews of The Psychology of Software Teams!! 🥹🥹🥹

i love this. 😭 * Truth is what it is (ideally something we can potentially measure) * Faith is what we believe is true (measurement is always inexact, or delayed, or…) * Beauty is what we’d like Truth to be or become — John Wilkes
(Borg/Omega talks on distributed systems, 2021)

BildBildBildBild
@teqnomad.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Let me squeeze it into here... "Truth is what is - ideally something we can potentially measure. Faith is what we believe is true. (Measurement is always inexact, and delayed, and ...) Beauty is what we'd like Truth to be or become."

writing my second response on AI, this one on ethics. here's my list, what am I missing? come on bsky, you were built for this day 😉 * datacenters that are too loud and use fresh water * data labeling work that is extractive & exploitative, chasing low pay * models trained on data without consent

this last line is brilliant, and exactly the right way to think about it. curiosity, communication, instrumentation, ownership.. these things do not guarantee great engineering, but they get you the best engineering this team can deliver. 🥂

Fabien Niñoles@ninoles.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I think the relation between them is related to a few shared attitudes: - curiosity - wide knowledge - good and open communication - good instrumentation - share ownership Get this, and although it doesn't guarantee great engineering, it gets you the best engineering the team can deliver.