Flavio Lehner

@climateflavors.bsky.social

Climate Scientist Assistant Professor @ Cornell University Chief Climate Scientist @ Polar Bears International https://flaviolehner.eas.cornell.edu/

The UK summer of 1976 was an extraordinary heatwave for its time. On the 50th anniversary, we look back to learn about what that event can tell us today. For those who experienced the heatwave it is engrained in the memory, but it gives us a stark warning about future extreme heat for the UK.

Heatwave 1976-2026. Our memory. Their future.

As Hudson Bay sea ice melts, the bears are moving onshore. This is a bit early than optimal but depends on the condition of the bears & how long until freeze-up in autumn. Bears were lean in April-May when I was out sampling in the spring but a lot can change later in spring (most critical time).

Bild

What is the probability (and physical mechanisms) of having your local record temperature occur earlier or later than the climatologically hottest time of year? E.g., the 2021 PNW heatwave occurred >1 month before the hottest time of year. Anyone know a study? Figure based on ERA5 1940-2025.

Bild

El Niño is here, which means it's time for me to dust off and refine my old collection of ENSO-related climate visualizations. Check out how much sea surface temperatures have already warmed this year across the equatorial tropical Pacific. Wow! Data from psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded...

Context: in 2018, FB labeled clean energy & climate as “political” topics. I was told I had to “register as a political entity.” I’m a scientist, I said. Over my dead body. So my previously thriving page was shadowbanned-til Dec when the algo was altered to deliberately promote divisive content 😳

Tim Bale@timbale.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Absolutely crucial piece of research on misinformation in local news on Facebook, X and Nextdoor by @smfthinktank.bsky.social Full report is here (www.smf.co.uk/publications...) but these are some key findings:

2 in 5 local Facebook groups and over four-fifths of X searches featured at least one piece of misinformation in their last 1,000 posts. Of 19 Nextdoor locations studied, 3 were found to contain misinformation.
Nearly 1 in 26 (4%) of news related posts on Facebook were misinformation; on X the ratio is over 1 in 4 (28%)
Places in local authorities with no or limited local news outlets (e.g. ‘news deserts’) had nearly 3 times as much fake news as a share of all posts as average on Facebook groups, albeit based upon 12 groups worth of data.
Conversely, places with a relatively high number of local news outlets (‘news oases’) have half as much misinformation as average, again based upon a limited sample (13 groups).
Places with local elections, on average, saw more misinformation in the run up to polling day than they did earlier in the year. Misinformation as a share of all posts increased from 0.12% to 0.15% (26% increase) and as a share of news grew from 8.2% to 12.9% (56%).
The rate of misinformation seen across four Gorton and Denton local Facebook groups was 26 times higher than in the wider Facebook analysis – 3% of 1,000 posts were identified as fake news, compared to 0.1% nationally. This is driven by far more news related posts on these groups, and a near doubling of the share of them being classified as misinformation.
Three in five misinformation posts (61%) in places with local elections in the week of the vote related to national politics or council issues, compared to 28% in the wider national analysis earlier in the year.
1 in 5 ‘fake news’ (19%) posts analysed on Facebook groups related to local issues, including planning, transport, local services and council politics. Our case studies revealed how planning applications could be misinterpreted into the “council selling off the beach”, or how local authority communications can be faked.
A third (32%) of misinformation found on X was anti-immigration or Islamophobic, far ahead of the next most common, h…

May 2026 had the second-worst May drought conditions in contiguous U.S. history, with a Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) of -6.93. The only worse May: the Dust Bowl year of 1934 (a PDSI of -7.03). Three of the top-10 months for worst U.S. drought since 1895 have been in 2026:

Bild

Ein problem für ganz Europa, und wo die USA ausnahmsweise auch voraus liegt (durch ua die flächendeckende Klimaanlagenaustattung ist die Anzahl der Hitzetote generell viel niedriger, auch bei ähnlichen und teils viel schlimmeren Hitzeperioden!) (zB hannahritchie.substack.com/p/heat-guns-... )

Do more Europeans die of summer heat than Americans die of guns?

An attempt to improve a viral chart.

hannahritchie.substack.com

Marcus Wadsak@marcuswadsak.bsky.social · 2mo ago

101 Hitzetote in Spanien. Im Mai. www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft...

That's a wrap! - 50 hours of science + calling Congress - 300 letters given to Congress after a 250-mile walk We provided the templates and our viewers and supporters injected their voices. And like last year, we feel so uplifted by our community. Thank you for spending your time with us

Haley Crim@haleycrim.bsky.social · 2mo ago

The @wclivestream.bsky.social is on hour 49 of livestreaming 100+ talks on climate and weather science! Tune in for the last hour to hear from @kimcobb.bsky.social and the group of scientists who walked from NYC to DC to hand off letters from around the country to Congresspeople!

Thanks Jeff! Emphasis on "may". Lots of competing (and complementary) theories out there on which forcing will win out. I did make a bet with another professor re snow drought occurrence this decade. The looser will have to give a guest lecture explaining why they lost. :)

Dr. Jeff Masters@drjeffmasters.bsky.social · 2mo ago

@climateflavors.bsky.social gave a great talk at wclivestream.com on worsening drought in the SW U.S. from less precip and warming. Part of the precip deficit may be from air pollution in Asia affecting jet stream position. If significant pollution reduction are made there, SW U.S. drought may ease.

I’m a climate scientist. Let me fix this headline. “Nearly a century ago, scientists showed that burning fossil fuels warms the planet. Today, we know human emissions account for over 100% of the warming. Yet dark money and disinformation still work to keep Americans addicted to fossil fuels.”

Forbes@forbes.com · 2mo ago

Scientists have reached a consensus that human behavior is a big driver of climate change—but Americans aren't buying it.

If you're a reviewer or an editor for a scientific journal, I urge you to not hop on the "RCP8.5 is dead" train. There are now editors that reject RCP8.5 but are ok with 1pctCO2. 🤯 Both are what-if scenarios, useful to science. Don't let politics influence what we can research and publish! 1/3

Very interesting paper teasing out the nuances of flood risk distribution in the US using an incredible individual-level dataset. Documents a huge concentration of flood risk among the very highest income group - lots of wealthy people enjoying the coast and river views from their second homes.

Bild
John Voorheis@johnvoorheis.bsky.social · 3mo ago

I have two new papers up in this week's NBER working papers (www.nber.org/papers/w35204 and www.nber.org/papers/w35219). Here's a couple of things I learned in pulling these papers together.