James Lark

@jameslark.bsky.social

Composer: https://www.jameslark.co.uk/

I was not informed by the BBC that they would have a right wing political figure or lobbyist on after me to rebut what I said. The individual in question went on to spout lies about China, etc. to distract attention from the Trump administration's assault on climate action. This is unacceptable.

Michael E. Mann@michaelemann.bsky.social · 6d ago

I'll be on BBC News television TODAY ~3:40pm ET (8:40pm London local time) to discuss--what else---the climate change-fueled weather extremes we're seeing around the world this summer. Please join me: www.bbc.com/live

Microsoft is planning to build three massive AI data centres in Leeds. It’ll drain thousands of litres of water from the River Aire and become the city's biggest carbon emitter. We can still stop the council's sign-off, but we need more voices. Add your name: you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/pr...

Stop the Microsoft AI megasite in Leeds!

Microsoft wants to build three huge AI data centres at Skelton Grange. It would drain the River Aire and become the city's biggest carbon emitter. We can still stop it - add your name to the petition.

you.38degrees.org.uk

One surprising thing going back to Some Mothers Do Av Em is just how subtle and crafted Michael Crawford's performance is, often all too obviously so next to the guest characters. Many of the latter have aged terribly, all OTT fury or camp grotesques. Frank Spencer is a far more authentic creation.

I've confirmed that the UK's new Sovereign AI Fund does no due diligence on whether AI companies use copyrighted work without permission before investing in them. It took me 3 Freedom of Information requests to find this out: 🧵 1/10

Bild

From the Shaping London's AI Future summary: "Bring employers, workers, educators and trade unions together to ensure that AI is introduced in ways that support people as well as technology." Erm. We don't need to introduce anything to support technology; we do not have obligations to technology.

I'm seeing various people praising Tim Stanley for his article saying climate change is real without apparently have read what the article says, so here's a précis lest you think the gallant defender of Boris Johnson's right to eat cake has had a sudden conversion to sanity.

It's the thing that makes angriest about book bans. Kids are already reading about all these topics online (and that social media ban isn't going to work at all). If I don't talk about those things in a book, then I'm leaving a young reader to navigate it all alone. How is that the moral choice?

"The year is 1996 and they are bringing Sylvester McCoy back for the wilderness years" "The year is 1999 and they are being Sylvester McCoy back for the wilderness years" "The year is 2026 and they're br-"

Sylvester McCoy in his question mark doctor who costume wondering where he parked his tardis

Anthropic has just been ordered to pay 1.5 billion dollars to copyright holders. But the harm is ongoing. They aren’t stopping societal wide copyright violation. So people have in effect been forced to issue licences against their will.