Louis Redux

@louisredux.bsky.social

Real-world data and clinical trials. Future epidemiologist. Biomedical & (ex-)chemical scientist. Not an instant internet expert, a real one. Mad like Byron, lefty like reality. Abject failure. Can be serious, often not. There will be jokes & swearing.

Okay genuinely asking— what does accountability look like for Holden Thorp and Hank Green? What I’d like to see: I’d love if @holdenthorp.bsky.social set a clear journalistic standard at SCIENCE and prohibited the use of LLMs for researching, writing, and editing publications at SCIENCE.

Debbie Gale Mitchell@heydebigale.bsky.social · 4d ago

So in the last two weeks EIC of Science and a famous science communicator have lost massive amounts of credibility because of their reliance on LLMs... Some examples of how to lose trust with your audience to share with my students I guess.

A reminder of the story behind the woeful Americanisation and decimation of an iconic British Brand, Cadbury, that was so much more than just a brand of chocolate, but also a proud British project for social improvement. apple.news/AROmsXsYiR2m...

The American woman who ripped the heart out of Cadbury — The i Paper

Kate Lister: Irene Rosenfeld oversaw Kraft's hostile takeover of Cadbury – and ordinary Brits have been suffering since

apple.news

The thing is, we have always had this version of AI as a glorified search engine. It just wasn’t widely available. But people want to use it to do every single fucking thing for them. Generative AI is a menace on society. Those who oppose education love shortcuts to make them seem educated 

I am very sceptical when it comes to the use of generative AI and LLMs. I will learn to use prompts for LLMs like I learned Boolean logic to use Google more effectively, mostly because various workplaces require at least basic AI literacy.. However, I haven't found a proper use case for it. 1/n

Put differently: the Conservative Party should not be adopting candidates who pump out this kind of abusive material, whatever their history. That we have seen where this man can take that approach - and that he had to be jailed for it in the past - makes that especially important.

I was open-minded on this at first. I do believe in repentance, I think people can change, & I could see the logic of giving someone who was trying to do better a chance in local govt. But the evidence suggest that the abusive, persecutory mode of politics hasn't changed. He's just switched targets

James Austin@jamesdaustin.bsky.social · 8h ago

I'll be honest: I'd buy this a lot more if his main outlet wasn't abusively attacking opposition politicians via AI slop in ways which obviously nod to other forms of prejudice.

With the Fauci circus, the COVID lab leak is back with a vengeance. Proponent’s objections to zoonotic origins seem to come from a Chinese menu. But none of it holds together when you try to lay out the recipe for a pandemic. 🧪 #episky #medsky #covid open.substack.com/pub/drbobmor...

The Lab Origin Menu

The COVID lab leak is back with a vengeance, but the story doesn't hold together when you try to lay out the recipe for a pandemic

open.substack.com

If anyone is wondering, I don't use generative AI. It offers me nothing useful creatively and nothing trustworthy as research. The environmental impact is appalling and the companies who developed it stole copyright intellectual property knowing that is illegal. GenAI is dishonest at every level.

Had this a lot recently. People explaining things to me that I didn't mention in a 300 character post that was only tangentially related, and that the briefest glimpse of my bio would suggest I'm fully aware of I'd never have a go at anyone for that, but it's not *not* annoying

John Scalzi@scalzi.com · 17h ago

Noticing some folks seem to think writers just say clever things without understanding how the world works, as if we're all naifs who just happen to be good with words instead of people with formal educations and a professional interest verging on requirement in the ability to conduct research

The only explanation for all this never ending madness, is that we, as a race are arseholes. Always have been, always will be. Without exception. As a species, it is perhaps our defining characteristic

For writers worried that they won't be able to "prove" their work isn't Spicy Autocomplete--worry not. You thought about every choice and will be able to talk about those choices easily and clearly. Folks who used the slop machine didn't make choices and won't have anything to say about why

In 1999 my girlfriend gave me a self-help book called Stop Procrastinating. In 2024 I finally got around to reading it. The book didn't work - I've even procrastinated for 2 years posting this fess.

Russia has faced a total sporting ban for 4 years due to starting an illegal war. The US started an illegal war among other legally questionable activities like kidnapping a president, and has been rewarded with the World Cup and Olympics. Makes complete sense to me.

My main takeaway was that trying to scientifically define biologically distinct competition categories of “women” and “men” is always going to be a nightmare and deeply harmful because human sex is complicated and people cannot (and should not) be forcibly categorized through sex testing.

In light of the “good faith questions” discourse I just wanted to re-up @reveleth.com’s fascinating podcast about the complex (and frequently appalling) history and present of policing sexual biology in women’s sports.

Reo Eveleth@reveleth.com · 2y ago

Hello new people! My latest project was a 10+ year labor of love and it would mean the world to me if you checked it out. www.tested-podcast.com It’s a narrative, deep, complex and suspenseful story of gender, sports, science, and “fairness.”

it’s never a great sign for your society when all the competent people who believe in doing a good job for the sake of it conclude that they’re actively being punished for these qualities, while malignantly stupid criminals are making bank

I tend to be the group organiser for things, but I don't do this. I wouldn't want to secure an advantage I had not previously discussed with my friends. I would rather pass on any advantage equally than benefit personally. I think it is an interesting ethical situation. I am after all doing "work"

fesshole 🧻@fesshole.bsky.social · 5d ago

I'm the organiser for lads' trips (like World Cup). I book the tours/activities for us, they pay me back their full share. I book with a Cashback site to also get 10% back. Fair commission for doing the legwork I reckon.