Emmanuel Cazottes

@manucazottes.bsky.social

Gene regulation, ML and stem cells | Postdoctoral fellow w/ @carldeboer.bsky.social @sbmeubc.bsky.social | PhD w/ @crougeulle.bsky.social @upcite.bsky.social | Roamer of the non-coding genome 🌐 https://emmanuelczt.github.io/

New paper! How do RNAs "know" where to go inside a cell? We dug into the sequence elements that route RNAs to the right place. It turns out that, in mammals, they're surprisingly massive (>200 nt), multipartite, and wonderfully complicated. 🧵

In a new preprint we benchmarked Active learning strategies in order to improve Sequence-to-expression models 🤖🧬 TLDR: AL improves performance on generalization tasks and selects data with high biological relevance! Check out the preprint and 🧵 by co-author @muntakimrafi.bsky.social to know more! 👇

Abdul Muntakim Rafi@muntakimrafi.bsky.social · 2mo ago

1/14 Sequence-to-expression (S2E) models keep getting better at reading cis-regulatory logic. But they haven't solved it. On tasks like variant effect prediction they're still far from accurate. Remember, solving cis-regulation is the goal and we're not going to settle for less!

Beautiful new study from @elphegenoralab.bsky.social and Leonid Mirny's lab: Cohesin-bridged encounters mediate enhancer-promoter communication, predicting how enhancer effect scales with genomic distance and - for the first time - how CTCF sites modulate enhancer-promoter communciation! 🧵 below

Elphege Nora Lab at UCSF@elphegenoralab.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Why can't we explain enhancer action despite 2 decades of chromosome conformation technologies? 😬 Our new study spearheaded by Leonid Mirny's group points to a flaw in our assumptions, and to a solution from physical principles By @timothyfoldes.bsky.social 💻& @karissalhansen.bsky.social 🧪 🧵👇

Preprint announcement! It was really fun teaming up with @timothyfoldes.bsky.social and the Mirny lab et al. for this one 🤝

Elphege Nora Lab at UCSF@elphegenoralab.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Why can't we explain enhancer action despite 2 decades of chromosome conformation technologies? 😬 Our new study spearheaded by Leonid Mirny's group points to a flaw in our assumptions, and to a solution from physical principles By @timothyfoldes.bsky.social 💻& @karissalhansen.bsky.social 🧪 🧵👇

We are so excited to see our work out in @nature.com! We present a multi-omic single-cell atlas of 12 organs in human fetal development, explore the enhancer landscape, use deep learning to infer rules of transcription factor activity, and interpret non-coding variants in complex traits: #GeneReg 🧬🖥️

John Greally@greally.bsky.social · 4mo ago

This @anshulkundaje.bsky.social, Kyle Fahr and William Greenleaf paper is finally out, we've been following it for a while in its preprint form, phenomenal work. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

MPRAs are the gold-standard tool for measuring how DNA sequences drive gene expression and prioritizing variant effects. In this preprint we asked: does it matter WHERE you place a variant in an MPRA? Spoiler: yes, and it might lead you to miss disease-causing variants. 1/6 doi.org/10.64898/202...

Position-dependent variant effects reveal importance of context in genomic regulation

Gene expression is governed by the DNA sequence, which is read out through complex interactions between transcription factors (TFs), co-activators, and chromatin. Massively Parallel Reporter Assays (MPRAs) provide a high-throughput framework for functionally characterizing how regulatory DNA sequences impact the expression of a model gene. MPRAs have also proven to be useful for measuring the effects of genetic variation, where each allele is typically tested in the center of ~200 bp of genomic context cloned into the MPRA, but the impact of variant position and local context remains largely unexplored. In this study, we systematically investigate how shifting the position of a variant within an MPRA probe influences its regulatory activity using models that predict expression in MPRAs from DNA sequence. We find that while the direction of variant effects is usually preserved across positions, the magnitude of expression changes can vary substantially depending on where the variant is placed within the construct. This positional bias appears to be largely explained by the strong position-dependent activity of TFs whose binding the variants perturb. In a subset of cases, interactions consistent with cooperativity between TFs also contribute to position-specific effects. ~1% of variants appear to disrupt RNA polymerase III (Pol III) promoters within Alu elements, resulting in position-specificity because both A and B boxes are required for function and exclusion of either motif due to window shifts disrupts the variants' effects. However, we saw little evidence to support the hypothesis that the positional dependence of variant effects resulted from the redundancy of motifs. Overall, our study demonstrates the complexity of cis-regulatory grammar and how it can confound the interpretation of regulatory variants. ### Competing Interest Statement R.T. has filed intellectual property related to MPRA and MPRA models. The other authors declare no competing interests.

biorxiv.org

We tile through ~300 ultra conserved elements 10bp at a time in 6 taxa (some alive, some extinct), to ask, are they the reason the two skulls below- separated by 160 million years of evolution - are so similar? (image from former PhD student Laura Cook)

Black and white photos of a thylacine (now extinct) and a grey wolf, in the same pose, looking pretty similar!Lateral adult skull of the c. thylacine and d. wolf. Ventral adult cranium of the e. thylacine and f. wolf. They also look pretty similar!

How to find Evolutionary Conserved Enhancers in 2025? 🐣-🐭 Check out our paper - fresh off the press!!! We find widespread functional conservation of enhancers in absence of sequence homology Including: a bioinformatic tool to map sequence-diverged enhancers! rdcu.be/enVDN github.com/tobiaszehnde...

Conservation of regulatory elements with highly diverged sequences across large evolutionary distances

Nature Genetics - Combining functional genomic data from mouse and chicken with a synteny-based strategy identifies positionally conserved cis-regulatory elements in the absence of direct sequence...

rdcu.be

🎉 This paper has been a long time and a labour of love (and hardship) for multiple group members, but, finally: we MPRA'ed 25k introgressed variants (Denisovan and Neanderthal) segregating at allele frequencies > 0.15 in humans today to evaluate their potential to regulate gene expression.

bioRxiv Evolutionary Biology@biorxiv-evobio.bsky.social · last yr.

Mapping the gene regulatory landscape of archaic hominin introgression in modern Papuans https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.04.652069v1