Paul Pod

@paulpod.bsky.social

Designer. Ex GOV, NHS, startups. Lives in Wales, London @paulpod on most things 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 website: Neuromantics.net 📨 signal: paulpod.404

She’s the most hilariously bad politician - she makes her ENTIRE week about insisting that this guy has turned over a new leaf, is very virtuous and the party is behind him, and then almost *shouts* ‘But I don’t like the things he’s doing now either! I actually HATE them!’ Lunatic.

“Elon Musk kind and considerate lover, possibly true representative of the godhead on earth, certainly a genius, and also good at computer games, says Elon Musk”

Bild

right, ok, enough self-pity, I need to turn my shit pub around. it's in Stratford, it's got a (small) stage, there has to be someone who has something cool they want a space for queer-run, extremely diverse venue (we even let mumbling old white geezers in) what I'd call 'mostly accessible'

"Dear Diary The launch of our scheme to use the Royal Navy to stop small boats has gone exactly to plan. It is so patently absurd that it is all anyone can talk about, providing the perfect distraction from all our dodgy financial dealings"

Bild

I don’t know how she felt about Hansard, but I find myself thinking a lot about Sinead O’Connor these past few days. She tried to warn everyone about everything and was destroyed for it.

"I want other people's kids to have the chance to do a vocational route, so there will be plumbers and electricians to fix Leo & Jessica's student flats."

But why would anyone use an AI-generated travel itinerary in the first place? I feel like people are just trying to use AI for things that already have solutions. Like, travel itineraries are a solved problem. Why are AI people making it an unsolved problem?

Mark Lemley@marklemley.bsky.social · 3d ago

Important safety tip for AI users: when relying on a proposed travel itinerary generated by AI, double-check to make sure that the dates AI proposes actually exist before making reservations. No, Claude, September 24, 2026 is NOT a Friday

Real or AI? Expect less guessing.   From 2 August, under new EU rules, anyone using generative AI professionally must be clear about: • AI content that could be mistaken for real • public-interest text that isn’t human-reviewed • chatbots interacting with users   AI Modified ©nejdetduzen/Adobe Stock

Illustration titled "Spot the difference" showing two nearly identical images side by side, labelled A and B. Both depict a scenic countryside landscape under a blue sky, with clouds star-shaped and arranged in a circle resembling the EU flag. Image A is labelled 'AI Modified'. Image credits and a disclaimer are added underneath, reading "Some content was AI generated with Gemini – © nejdetduzen / Adobe Stock." The European Parliament logo in the bottom right corner.Illustration titled 'Adding an AI label makes a big difference', explaining three EU AI content labels. 1) Basic icon: a black circle with the letters 'AI' inside, to be used when AI was involved in creating deep fake content (image, audio, video), published text, or when a custom text label or interactive second layer is implemented. 2) Fully AI-Generated: a black badge reading 'AI GENERATED,' to be used when the entire deep fake content or text is fully generated by AI with no human-created elements or human editorial control, apart from prompting. 3) Partially AI-Modified: a black badge reading 'AI MODIFIED,' to be  used when pre-existing, human-made content was partially modified with AI, turning it into a deep fake or text on matters of public interest. Footer note: 'The use of these EU icons is optional, but the labelling requirements under Article 50 of the AI Act are not.' The European Parliament logo is featured in the bottom right corner.

Personally I think there are "legitimate questions" about COVID. Like why Michael Gove and Matt Hancock got away with giving away contracts to their mates. And why the fuck Michelle Mone and Doug Barrowman haven't been prosecuted.

I've been arguing for many years that the team is the real product of software development, learning is the real outcome, and that organisations need to optimise for *that* Software, and its impact in the real world, is an ephemeral byproduct of learning. (1/)

😳 “A law to sell [parts of] Argentina to the ultra-rich of the world *** On Aug 6, the Senate plans to vote on Milei's new bill, the Private Property Inviolability Law. If approved, tech tycoons like Peter Thiel will be able to keep the water, energy & climate of Patagonia” By F. Gomez, 7/31/26… 1/

= VATURES / FORUMS AND DEBATES >
FOREIGNIZATION
A law to sell
Argentina to the ultra-rich of the
NOr C
On August 6, the Senate plans to vote on Milei's new bill, the Private Property Inviolability Law. If approved, technology tycoons like Peter Thiel will be able to keep the water, energy and climate of Patagonia
Florencia Gómez (Amfibia) 07/31/2026