Sevoris (he/him)

@sevoris.bsky.social

Grad Student in Data Science and NLP. Design, philosophy, sociology, politics, making a better world with listening and networking. Also interested in speculative fiction writing and philosophy - letting reality write new things.

NEW: Meta reviewed, approved, and ran more than 50 ads containing AI-generated child sexual abuse material across Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Threads. They ran for nine months. Some were live this week. After WIRED asked about them, researchers found ~30 more

Meta Ran Ads That Contained AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Imagery

More than 50 offending image and video ads were published across Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, or Threads, according to Meta’s ad library data. Some ran as recently as this week.

wired.com

That account that reposts messages that people were blocked over is a terrible addition to the bluesky ecosystem because it turns what should be a personal user safety interaction into a public spectacle (made possible only b/c blocks are public, which is also an anti-safety design).

Remember when Republicans were yammering on about mandated use of social security numbers being “mark of the beast” gov overreach. Now we’re blazing into mandated “upload your face scan everywhere” while some very profitable businesses still don’t take all basic credit cards as a form of payment.

If SCREEN were to pass, you'd be required to scan your face and upload an ID to access this site because it allows "harmful" material. This affects you even if you don't care about sex work or porn.

404 Media@404media.co · yesterday

Mike Lee's SCREEN Act, which heads to Senate Commerce Committee for markup on Wednesday, would expand age verification requirements to a nearly limitless scope of websites, and is supported by the architects of Project 2025.

PS I’ve noticed that if you complain about enshittification of any kind on this platform you immediately get condescending reply guys saying “well, you shouldn’t be doing XYZ” or “simply move all your work to ZYX”, as if we should be obediently dancing around this shit rather than calling it out

When disabled people/many people who work on disability/health pointed to the dangers of this kind of framing since COVID, they were usually mocked ("oh you think everything is eugenics") or ignored. But normalising the idea that the deaths of disabled people are desirable/reassuring is dangerous.

The New York Times@nytimes.com · 2d ago

Breaking News: Two deaths in Michigan have been linked to cyclospora. Both people who had the parasite also had underlying health issues.

When people die and the media says they had “pre-existing conditions”… they’re pacifying the public. Anyone could die from Cyclosporiasis, but they want you to believe it can’t happen to you. It can only happen to the weak, the disabled, the elderly. The expendable people. Eugenics.

Two Deaths Linked to Cyclospora Outbreak in Michigan

The patients had “significant underlying health conditions” that may have contributed to their deaths, health officials said.

nytimes.com

For the love of fuck, all of us folks in marginalized communities who are endlessly stalked on, slandered on, and eventually run off of every other motherfucking social media platform on Planet goddamn Earth would love to be left alone for FIVE FUCKING MINUTES.

I keep saying this - there are plenty of ways to do age verification without requiring people to give up their privacy online. The fact that governments insist on methods that require you to give up your privacy shows that "making people give up their privacy" was always the real point.

bisaknosp@bisaknosp.bsky.social · 2d ago

Most people voluntarily give up their full name and pictures of their face on Facebook, Instagram, Linkedin, etc! The government can very easily verify someone's identity anonymously, meaning without the website knowing who was verified. Australia just didn't implement this.

An initiative on the ballot in Washington state in November would require all athletes seeking to play girl's sports from kindergarten to high school to undergo "genetic screening, a testosterone-levels test, or an examination of their reproductive anatomy" before they can play

The Campaign to Force Genital Exams on Girl Athletes Soon Washington State could require sex-verification tests for those playing sports in schools.
Portrait of Andrea González-Ramírez
By Andrea González-Ramírez, a senior writer for The Cut who covers systems of power. Those physicals, Maria explains, are usually perfunctory: “Like, Are you walking normally? Are you lightheaded? I have never had to take any clothes off. I’ve never felt uncomfortable or violated.” If IL26-638 were to pass and Maria were still in school, she says she would likely drop out of her team. (We’re withholding Maria’s real name to protect her privacy.) “I honestly don’t know if I would be able to do these tests,” she adds. “It would also make me question, If I do it, are all my teammates going to too? Or would I just play with the three or four girls who are willing to or have access to do it?”

Australia’s eSafety commissioner buried a report (released Friday afternoon) that shows the under 16 social media ban didn’t tangibly reduce teen social media use, and also resulted in parents tuning out of kids usage. We traded our privacy for no reason. theconversation.com/more-than-80...

More than 80% of kids still using social media despite ban, new eSafety report finds

The report provides more evidence Australia’s world-leading social media ban isn’t going to plan.

theconversation.com

Dieser Blödsinn lässt sich übrigens durch Evidenz ganz leicht wieder legen. Das erfolgreichste Land pro Kopf bei Olympischen Spielen ist Norwegen m gerade einmal 5,6 Millionen Einwohner_innen. Zauberformel ist Breitensport. Norwegen ermöglicht es allen Kindern verschiedene Sportarten auszuprobieren.

Christian Eichfeld@ceichfeldleipzig.bsky.social · 2d ago

Der ganze Bullshit neoliberalen Populismus in einem Tweet, der übrigens genauso gut aus dem FDP -Parteipräsidium stammen könnte. #Leistungsfetischismus

Tweet der "Wirtschaftsweisen" V. Grimm

I watched as much of Miller's "rebuttal" as I could stand. Let's just say the man comes across as a full-blown creep. I'm not sure if it will backfire per se. I'm sure most people believed the accusations. The only real question is if they care. And mostly, Republicans don't care.

like, these were already swirling around independent of each other, but people drew connections, like, "HEY BRO you claim to care about children and imaginary threats like 'vaccine injury' but not real threats like actually physical and psychic injury cased to your own child and grandchild"

Things I and friends have done to calm an angry abusive man from further escalating and killing us or our children: -Smiled -Kept normal schedules in order not to trigger a fight -Appeased with kind acts (cooking, cleaning, favors) -Forced friendly tones and words

The Bulwark@thebulwark.com · 3d ago

Rep. Max Miller: "My former wife has claimed that during a custody exchange at my home that day, I assaulted her…If I had assaulted her, would she have offered to cook me dinner six days later?"

If you ever feel you have imposter syndrome, read this. These people, the "smartest people in the busuness", had seen years of Trump's behavior and they still fell for it. Incredible. And every one probably believed he wouldn't do to THEM what he does to everyone else.

Covid lockdowns demonstrated, in a deeply imperfect way, the possibility of large-scale social solidarity for a higher cause. That is a prime reason why so many powerful people want us to run screaming away from them into the comforting arms of selfish individualist competition.

This is particularly maddening. If a YouTube creator has posted sexy content ANYWHERE - for an unspecified definition of sexy - then they can lose their account, their income, possibly their career, without appeal. I like (some) sexy content. Probably you do too. Why do the prudes get to rule?

Sam Cole@samleecole.bsky.social · 5d ago

YT spox told me they want to be clear on why creators were banned. it's the links out to other site that contain "sexually gratifying" content, not their content ON YOUTUBE. I had some follow up questions:

 Is it fair to say that users cannot have a Youtube channel if they also have 18+ fansites that they advertise elsewhere? How many clicks does one need to be removed from Youtube to be able to have an adult fansite that's unrelated to their Youtube channel?  Did a human at Youtube look at these creators' Instagram accounts, for example, and decide they were "sexually gratifying?" These are some of the questions creators are asking.