Stephen Yang!

@stephenyang.bsky.social

PhDing @USCAnnenberg // studying media, technology, environment // prev @Cornell @MSFTResearch @CDT // Angelino & 臺灣人 https://www.stephen-yang.com/

As scholars and journalists start to write more about data center noise politics, I hope they'll consider the precedents — the history of noise abatement activism + regulation, the whole history of zoning (which is in large part about sensory regulation), etc.

Now is a good reminder that machine learning is a rebranding of statistical learning. Reinforcement learning is something I first came across in control theory. Many ML formulations are from information theory, a much more theoretically grounded discipline that's been around for decades.

Casey Newton@caseynewton.bsky.social · last wk.

There's a reason why "these are just statistical predictions" hasn't caught on in the discourse, and it's not the tech press. It's that people see them reading and writing and reasoning and scheming and they realize that the stochastic-parrots framing is outdated and inadequate to the moment

Sorry, but I need to rant about this some more--mainly, the importance of history in the current political landscape, and the way the field of media studies often treats historical work as the antithesis to the more politically conscious sub-field of contemporary criticism. I'm pissed, so buckle up.

Eric Shmeric@ericdienstfrey.bsky.social · 3w ago

Just read another newly published article that discusses at length the film industry's adoption of Dolby technology, but that doesn't actually cite any existing historical work on the subject, and that instead just takes Dolby's pr at face value (or cites the "bro" academics who love Star Wars).

"...if we continue to let our most experimental and interesting institutions fail in favor of administrative scale, we will find ourselves with a higher education system that is larger, more efficient and entirely devoid of the vibrancy that so many other countries are struggling to emulate."

apropos of vibes, but striking when “critical computing” papers make critical points only by citing other ACM papers, particularly when a dozen papers are stacked into a single bracket citation [1, 9, 33, 34, 49, 54, 63, 74] And yes I too have sinned. Effects of formats (cf. Sterne, 2012), perhaps?

Check out my colleagues’ and my work on sociotechnical errors published in @ijoc-usc.bsky.social (edited by Mike Ananny and Simogne Hudson)! I found the collection incredibly illuminating in helping me think through how errors are/may be claimed, mobilized, accounted for, and cared for

Mike Ananny@mikeananny.bsky.social · last yr.

Re-upping this with better direct link to this @ijoc-usc.bsky.social collection: annenbergpress.com/2025/04/23/i... If you've ever been curious abt tech system errors, failures, breakdowns, & mistakes, check out this amazing new collection edited by me & Dr. Simogne Hudson, with fantastic authors.

How can live music culture help us rethink the ethics of algorithms when their operations are indeterminate in real time? This past weekend, I explored this question at the Failing Media Conference in Chicago. Part of this work was just published in IJOC: ijoc.org/index.php/ij...

Bild
Mike Ananny@mikeananny.bsky.social · last yr.

So much is broken right now, but I want to share an amazing new set of short, teachable interdisciplinary essays on ** Sociotechnical Error ** Live at IJOC journal @ijoc-usc.bsky.social: ijoc.org/index.php/ij... (scroll to Forum) Intro by me & Simogne Hudson: ijoc.org/index.php/ij... Pls share!

Headline: " International Journal of Communication Publishes a Forum on "Oops? Interdisciplinary Stories of Sociotechnical Error""

Abstract: " What can we learn about people and technology through interdisciplinary stories of sociotechnical errors, failures, breakdowns, and mistakes? 


Guest edited by Mike Ananny and Simogne Hudson, the Forum on Oops? Interdisciplinary Stories of Sociotechnical Error takes up the question through a playful and provocative mix of projects that show how sociotechnical errors happen, why they matter, and what they reveal about people, technology, and power. Amidst so many complex collisions among people, data, engineering, and media—and in an age when technological "innovation" is widely celebrated and inescapable—these articles offer changes to pause and ask what system failures show about how people and machines intersect and vie for power.


Including scholars from communication, media studies, urban planning, critical data studies, and science and technology studies, the collection of essays invites readers to see failures anew—to consider errors, breakdowns, and mistakes from a different perspective, method, or normative stake. Use these essays to start conversations about what "error" means in your work or community, and why it matters.

We invite you to read these articles that published in the International Journal of Communication on April 23, 2025. Please log into ijoc.org to read the papers of interest. We look forward to your feedback!"