Dr Suzy J Styles

@suzyjstyles.bsky.social

Developmental Psycholinguist. How do languages get into a person? And how do they make a difference? Brain Language and Intersensory Perception (BLIP Lab) at NTU Singapore. Teach: Cog Psych, An Ape’s Guide to Human Language, Lang in Perception & Thought

“I shall send off the manuscript today or Monday. It is an extremely poor affair; I must say something & have nothing worth saying. Lock it up carefully, I hate it to that extent it would break my heart to write it again.” Charles Darwin captures the joy of academia in a letter to his daughter, 1871

Taking linguistic/grammatical diversity in the world's languages 🌏 serious is important because a too narrow perspective on how language works (in the brain), based on a few and in the grand scheme quite similar languages — English, German, Dutch, … — will miss a big part of the picture. 🖼️ 🧵4/

Issue 6: If an input violates the terms or acceptable uses, the user is solely liable. However, if an output violates the terms, the user is still solely liable! Apparently the provider can never be at fault. Even when they use automated black box filtering/detection invisible to users. 11/

What I like here is that the solution comes from the students themselves "multiple low-stakes attempts rather than single high-pressure performances, conversations rather than presentations, uncapped formative practice that builds confidence, and peer explanation normalised as a routine activity"

Wonkhe@wonkhe.bsky.social · 7mo ago

NEW on Wonkhe: Students aren't confused about AI – they're making rational choices in a system that has removed the incentives to learn. Jim Dickinson and Mack Marshall preview findings from new research on learning in an age of AI buff.ly/4TKftU3

Imagine being Hodgson's typesetter. He rocks up with his manuscript. "Any footnotes in this guv?" "Um. Just a couple." Then after he's gone, you open it and see this stuff. Academics: however naughty you think you are with footnotes you are a SPECK IN THE EYE of John Hodgson. 16/22

Two columns of text with a beautiful engraving of a ruined wall in the middle.Two columns of text with a beautiful engraving of a bit of stonework, and a carefully laid out table of symbology.

Let’s talk ✨constructive friction✨ in educational design! Yes, many students adopt AI as a rational response to assessment where thinking isn’t required for success @wonkhe.bsky.social But let’s talk about cases where friction makes something hard to do, and the by-product is learning! 🧵

Wonkhe@wonkhe.bsky.social · 7mo ago

NEW on Wonkhe: Students aren't confused about AI – they're making rational choices in a system that has removed the incentives to learn. Jim Dickinson and Mack Marshall preview findings from new research on learning in an age of AI buff.ly/4TKftU3

A very very interesting thread on how individual mental experiences cannot be fit in a "one size fits all" description or paradigm. With tantalizing breadcrumbs on how there are multiple spectrums (biological, cultural and personal) lurking here as we map out the varieties of mental experience. 🧵

Dr Suzy J Styles@suzyjstyles.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Once a year I ask my students to imagine a red star. It’s cognitive psychology and we are about to talk about whether “imagery” is the same or different from “perception”, but first, I like to check in on what our class experience when we imagine something. Friends, the results NEVER disappoint!

A digital pinboard showing six options. Ranging from 1. Nothing. 2. A vague outline with no/barely any colour. To 5. A vivid red star and 6. Something more elaborate. 35 people respond as “imagers” (Options 4-6). 6 people show aphantasia (Options 1-2), with one person selecting ‘nothing’.

In the comments section for “nothing”, someone has asked “hello one friend. How do you imagine things?” The reply says “I think of concepts (weepy-face) can’t see things in my mind”

I first realised I was aphantasic after a psych undergrad and a PhD in cognitive neuro (studying visual ST memory no less). I got in an argument in the pub with someone who has extremely vivid imagery. I kept saying, no you just think it’s visual in nature (😳) - it’s just a visual representation!

Is mental imagery a single process? Our meta-analysis of 46 fMRI studies suggests not. We find a key divide between object imagery (visualizing an object in rich detail) and spatial imagery (mentally transforming objects). This split mirrors the ventral and dorsal streams of vision

Star (shape) and Star (astronomical) are both welcome here. The imagery scale simply asks about how vivid the image is, rather than which kind sounds like you added rich details like solar flares that weren’t mentioned in the prompt, so that aligns best with the ✨ hyperphantasia ✨ end of the scale

Post nicht verfügbar.

awhile ago someone asked for feedback on a paper where the whole thesis was "aphantasia is a made-up concept used to pathologise normal people and romanticise genius bc of course nobody ACTUALLY sees things and pretending like some special people do is just putting them on a pedestal"

I'm really bad. I have no static visual imagery in my head at all. I can see movement though. So if I think of how I would draw a star I can visualise a basic star being drawn. People always pop up on these discussions and say 'no one with aphantasia can be an artist' and yah sucks boo to those guys

Dr Suzy J Styles@suzyjstyles.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Once a year I ask my students to imagine a red star. It’s cognitive psychology and we are about to talk about whether “imagery” is the same or different from “perception”, but first, I like to check in on what our class experience when we imagine something. Friends, the results NEVER disappoint!

A digital pinboard showing six options. Ranging from 1. Nothing. 2. A vague outline with no/barely any colour. To 5. A vivid red star and 6. Something more elaborate. 35 people respond as “imagers” (Options 4-6). 6 people show aphantasia (Options 1-2), with one person selecting ‘nothing’.

In the comments section for “nothing”, someone has asked “hello one friend. How do you imagine things?” The reply says “I think of concepts (weepy-face) can’t see things in my mind”

There used to be a lot of arguments about that on art forums years ago! (I think before aphantasia became widely known?) It was always a hopeless shouting match between people who couldn’t see images in their mind insisting that those of us who could must be delusional and not really seeing things

I used to think I was the type who visualized fully in great detail. Recently, I realized that it’s more like a detailed image with blind spots, almost like I can’t “look” at the image directly, but can see it in the periphery or sometimes, conversely, like I’m scanning it through tunnel vision.

Once a year I ask my students to imagine a red star. It’s cognitive psychology and we are about to talk about whether “imagery” is the same or different from “perception”, but first, I like to check in on what our class experience when we imagine something. Friends, the results NEVER disappoint!

A digital pinboard showing six options. Ranging from 1. Nothing. 2. A vague outline with no/barely any colour. To 5. A vivid red star and 6. Something more elaborate. 35 people respond as “imagers” (Options 4-6). 6 people show aphantasia (Options 1-2), with one person selecting ‘nothing’.

In the comments section for “nothing”, someone has asked “hello one friend. How do you imagine things?” The reply says “I think of concepts (weepy-face) can’t see things in my mind”