Ross

@wochie.bsky.social

FRAG ✶ KING CHICAGO

BOURDAIN: so ive had joints of mutton everywhere. exeter, wroexeter, berwick. Ive never seen a joint of mutton prepared like this MEDIEVAL SPIT-BOY: we roaste thee meat under a pafte which keeps the juices, and renders the meat moft tendere BOURDAIN: *chuckling* wow

Since I have few better things to do, I setup local LLM on my desktop and found some small models that would fit in 10-ish gigs of VRAM. I get 25tok/sec of either okay summaries I can cross reference or really powerful nonsense

Just to second this: I find Wilson’s criticisms enlightening as a person who is not at all a trained classicist, but this point, along with a few questioning statements about Nolan’s ability to triangulate his own themes, did hit me weird. I think Nolan did make a meal of The Odyssey, misses and all

Asher Elbein@asherelbein.bsky.social · last wk.

I do want to pick apart this observation in Emily Wilson's review: "we are not shown that war and killing are bad." This is an odd point to me, given that I found the entire war as presented to be a squalid, poisoned event that has brought everyone involved with it harm despite its glorification

i really enjoyed the odyssey despite agreeing with a lot of emily wilson's criticisms of it (& finding nolan's overly-expository dialogue generally irksome) but she did go a bit angry video game nerd in her review there

Had a webserver getting crushed by Claude for some reason. Dug in to the logs and someone made a shitty php hangman game back in 2008, the dipshit computers found it, and were “playing” it 1M+ times a day until I blocked it. The future sucks ass

Nolan's weakness seems to be that he loves story-shape so much, often to the detriment of character or any sort of stylistic flourish that would lend some texture or cultural specificity. Great to watch if you like story shapes, but aggravating to think about over time.