Checking in on the opposition to the El-Sayed campaign now and... oh that's interesting
"So he can feel a bit more manly by making an AI video" is a direct callback to this image that deserves a second life in this campaign
worst-case scenario engineer
@worstcaseeng.bsky.social
Relay engineer, professional worst-case scenario predictor, mad online. He/Him Infrastructure should not be for-profit
Checking in on the opposition to the El-Sayed campaign now and... oh that's interesting
"So he can feel a bit more manly by making an AI video" is a direct callback to this image that deserves a second life in this campaign
"So he can feel a bit more manly by making an AI video" is a direct callback to this image that deserves a second life in this campaign
Dr. Abdul El-Sayed: Mike Rogers is a guy who wants to put a data center in your backyard so he can feel a bit more manly by making an AI video. If you want a senator who's gonna lick some boots, go vote for Rogers. But if you want a senator who's going to stand up to Trump, you've got your option.
TEN YEAR OLD BOY PLANS TO FLY LIKE SUPERMAN WHEN HE GROWS UP
SPACEX PLANS MOON FACTORIES POWERED BY HUMANOID ROBOTS
Agreed! It's all about the Hierarchy of Controls. There's a reason the top of the inverted pyramid is "Elimination."
I'm not being facetious, this is a sincere take, but after spending many many hours over the years mulling solutions to distracted drivers, I've firmly landed on not removing the distracted part but rather the driver part. We need solutions to reduce phone use driving, but also driving.
This is wise, and hopefully his supporters and the supporters of his opponent will all model his behavior, rally together, and try to win the seat.
El-Sayed: There is so much more that unites us, however much we might disagree with our democratic opponent, there is so much more that unites us than divides us. And so to all of our supporters here tonight watching on TV—tomorrow, we begin to mend fences.
Something I think those of us who grew up in 90s or earlier are going to have to internalize — and will always struggle to remember — is that US voters no longer accept the fiction that politics is a contest between liberal and conservative ideas, rather than faction-based culture war by other means
I’m telling you this as a political scientist. The person who is electable is the one who is elected. This can and does change over time. Any and all speculation about “electability” is either puffery or anxiety and is often both.
One way to be safe is to never write an electability take
The media's takeaway from an El-Sayed win is the same as it would have been from a Stevens win, and the same as it will be if El-Sayed wins the general, or if he loses it: everyone, no matter who they are, needs to take several steps to the right.
Waking up to good news, good job Michigan, good job Abdul, Haley stop doing that voice now
The Ken Jennings kerfuffle, IMO, is a symptom of a wider problem- no one will fucking admit to being/doing something wrong anymore. All he needed to say was "omg, I didn't realize paying the NYT contributes to harm to the trans community. I'm sorry, I'll unsubscribe. Know any Wordle alternatives?"
(the most bullshit Michigan accent you've ever heard) what the frick
Have now been snorting with laughter at random for days remembering different lines from @lauriewoolever.bsky.social's review of the RFK Jr. "cooking show" flaminghydra.com/issue-621/
Just so everyone knows, this is a tried-and-true mainstream media tactic. For progressives/leftist candidates, every election is a “crucial test” and any loss would serve as proof to the media that the latest left-side moment is at its end. Any win, though, just means it’s time to find a new test.
Michigan will provide another crucial test of whether progressives can not only keep up their winning streak in safe-blue seats but also break through in battlegrounds crucial for control of Congress. The stakes for the Democratic Party are huge.
I'm just so fucking tired of people being like "no, the free market is working!" and then ignoring all the ways that we don't actually have a free market and our markets are owned by like, twenty men in trench coats.
I truly don't know if Mamdani's grocery stores will "work," but here's the thing: at least he's trying something. I wish more politicians would try things, even if they didn't work, when people were in need.
Many say this leaves no path to redemption; I will note that paths to redemption exist, but they are for the offender to walk, not for others to deem it walked on their behalf. And a Nazi isn't walking a path of redemption if they remain in the Nazi party. Nothing stopping them. Path open.
"but this is Soviet propaganda" yeah bro why are you handing it to them, they don't even have to lie
"First lesson" - Soviet poster, 1964
all due respect but if you need to procreate get used to this
Dads Are Watching 'The Irishman' on Their Phones During Bathroom Breaks
‘Fuck off, Martin Scorsese. Some of us have families and no reasonable time’
melmagazine.com
they all know that abusers know how to make their victims stay. they all know why victims of rape don't always go to the police. they know this guy did it and they'll repeat his lies and pull the lever for him anyway.
It doesn't take that much empathy or imagination to understand this, so anyone who doesn't I am convinced is using motivated reasoning either because they Are an abuser themselves or they're invested in covering for them
"She came to my house in a good mood and left calmly." More non-proof. Abusers *often* weaponize the fawn response. "If I was so bad, would she X?" If you abused her and now have unsupervised access to her kid, yes, she would X. She would do anything to keep her kid safe. Ask me how I know.
(Describing a classic abusive relationship dynamic) now does that sound plausible to you, that my bitch wife would do that
Rep. Max Miller: "My former wife has claimed that during a custody exchange at my home that day, I assaulted her…If I had assaulted her, would she have offered to cook me dinner six days later?"
The White House plan to attract manufacturing businesses with a volatile regulatory environment, new arbitrary taxes (subject to change on a whim), and sending secret police to harass foreign workers has not led to more factory construction in the US. Why didn’t that work? I was told it would work.
THIS. People educated enough in the specific subject to pull the data together don’t need LLMs; people without the knowledge to weed data from the bullshit are at the mercy of the LLM. They’re obsequious Dunning-Kruger machines. Designed to flatter midwits and the technologically obsolete.
So, ok, a thing about telling yr audience "i use AI for my info gathering/research but then I look over it and fix any errors" is that you unfortunately told me youve outsourced your knowledge base on this subject to the machine, and therefore I have no reason to believe you CAN catch those errors