Alex Schmidt

@alexschmidty.bsky.social

alexschmidty.com listen to "Secretly Incredibly Fascinating" (a great podcast) every week!

Realizing the extent to which this is true wildly changed my opinions about how to deal with Trumpism, since they're never going to be satisfied unless they're actively dominating everyone else. You can't give them some concessions and go back to the status quo: they're reactionary revolutionaries.

Better Things Are Possible@internethippo.bsky.social · 18h ago

Antebellum politics is fascinating, the South kept getting policy concessions and whipped themselves up into a paranoid rage anyway, essentially because they couldn't stand being culturally judged for having slaves

im the dumbest motherfucker on the planet and i fell for a guy on you tube saying that polio is good for you. you have to be nice to me and treat my views as if theyre normal things an adult with a functioning brain might blelieve

Hey. It’s John Moe. If you go to your podcast app today and look up The Hilarious World of Depression, you will find a new episode. Hosted by me. First one in six+ years. This is not an error. This is the present tense.

This is an important point that it seems like a lot of people don't fully grasp. We don't impose *legal* penalties until something is proved to appropriate standards in a court case. But we don't need legal findings to make judgements like "I don't trust him" and vote for someone else.

Courtney Milan@courtneymilan.com · 2mo ago

You do not have to give people “due process” before you choose not to vote for them. You can just be like “oh word the guy who wrote rape apologia and had allegations just got another serious allegation? Guess he doesn’t need to be my senator.”