C.A. Petrov

@capetrov.bsky.social

she/her. aka FullMetaDuchess. Naturalized ✡️, absent most Saturdays. Learning every day if I'm lucky. On the downside of middle age and drifting ever leftward. Header from 'Dreams' by Melton Fisher. Please don't follow me unless you like reading my skeets.

An acquaintance is being sexually harassed at this job. I see him about once a week and ask how it’s going. Today he confessed, he can’t afford to leave because of his student loans. The point of debt at a national level, at an indivisible level, is docility. It’s capital’s greatest asset.

Tongues Out Tuesday! This is a male Gila Woodpecker and his tongue is out so far you can see the thick pink fleshy part I don't know what he was going after I didn't see him retrieve anything

The body is mostly tan/gray. The wings are black and white striped. The males have a red cap of feathers on top of the head.

If your historical setting is a major city it was never an all white place. Traders, migrants, laundry, railroad...pick a time period, somebody of color was always present. Sometimes as servants, more often as people going about their business. That's not DEI casting, that's actual history.

Daniel@deargodwhaat.bsky.social · 20h ago

Prompts a fun question: whats the most niche historical inaccuracy in a piece of work that annoys you Not like 'oh they were referring to the wrong king' , more 'they had the wrong king on a banknote in one scene'

TL;DR - Using a hospital as a military command centre makes it lose its strict “off-limits” character, but leaves intact the special protection of civilians and patients inside it as well as the duty to preserve its ability to operate as a hospital, which largely precludes any bombing.

Florence Ashley@floralashes.bsky.social · 41m ago

I see a lot of misunderstanding about the legal ramifications of Hamas allegedly using hospitals as military command centres. Under the Geneva Conventions, hospitals are owed two things—respect and protection. Only the second of these can be lost.

personally I think it is not great that the federal government is not only weaponizing the criminal legal system against political opponents, but citing as their justification a 4chan conspiracy theory

I spoke a bit about Matthew Shepard over the weekend in person to some folks, but I didn't want to let the anniversary of his death — October 12, 1998 — pass by without giving a moment to him and his memory here.

The official U.S. Department of Education account posted a Columbus Day video set to the song L'Amour toujours, which, if you don’t know, is a random dance song that’s been song co-opted by Nazi groups across Europe, complete with new (nazi) lyrics. link in next post. x.com/usedgov/stat...

a screenshot from x. the U.S. department of education account has posted a video. in the screenshot it’s conquistadors with a cross from the movie apocalypto.

maybe only trans people are bothering to notice, but there are also Democrats running explicitly anti-trans ads in Ohio so yeah when I'm saying *from personal experience* that ads from both parties are very much harming my well-being, perhaps do a quick google search before calling me ignorant

Bluesky response that says "One political party is trying to protect you (Democrats). The other party (Republicans) want you to not exist. Blaming both parties is pretty ignorant. Know who your enemies are before casting blame on everyone."

There is absolutely no way for an officially contracted writer for a licensed property who is writing to the specifics of who ever owns the IP, to then meet every individual readers story preferences and we really have to get away from that being treated as reasonable expectation.

In the transphobic narrative gender-conservatives traffick in, the transfeminine spectre is a rapacious other while the transmasculine is a corrupted innocence. The dehumanization of both is distinct but linked; transmasculine people are regendered as a patriarchal resource to be protected.

Ohhh... so, is this why pre-decimal European money worked the way it did? Decimals don't make sense in a ratio world? (Basically the only book I've read on the history of measurement is Hasok Chang's amazing Inventing Temperature; frantically googling)

A short excerpt from Jim Tolpin and George Walker's By Hand and Eye: "The language of the artisans was all about finding, generating and laying out whole-number ratios with a compass and straightedge. They were not using rulers to work to arithmetic derivations of a numbered measurement. So while using a scale based on one to 10 works fine to resolve numerical formulas, you do often end up with decimal fractions of a whole number. That would require an artisan to lay out to a numbered ruler – not to mention having to deal with decimal places. Another downside in using base-10 is that 10 doesn’t readily break down in whole-number fractions: You are limited to 1/5 and 1/2. A one-to-12 scale, on the other hand, gives you 1/6, 1/4, 1/3 and 1/2 – the ratios of which can be easily counted out on one hand (thank you ancient Babylonians) as shown in the drawing below. Note that you use your thumb as the counting cursor."